Lotzin Annett, Lu Xiaoxing, Kriston Levente, Schiborr Julia, Musal Teresa, Romer Georg, Ramsauer Brigitte
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany,
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2015 Jun;18(2):99-132. doi: 10.1007/s10567-015-0180-z.
The quality of the parent-infant interaction is essential for the infant's development and is most objectively measured by observation. The existing observational tools for assessing parent-infant interaction were identified and described, and their psychometric soundness was evaluated. Twenty electronic databases from inception through June 2013 were searched. Validity was evaluated in five domains (test content, response process, internal structure, relations to other variables, and consequences). Of the 23,961 citations identified, 24 tools were included. Most tools demonstrated a valid rating procedure, reproducibility, and discriminant validity, based on studies with credible quality. The tools lacked factorial and predictive validity, and standardized norms. Further refinement of the existing tools is needed, particularly in the domains of content validity and consequential validity. The synthesized validity evidence and descriptions of the tools reported in this review might guide clinicians and researchers in the selection of an appropriate tool.
亲子互动的质量对婴儿的发育至关重要，且通过观察进行测量最为客观。对现有的评估亲子互动的观察工具进行了识别和描述，并评估了其心理测量的可靠性。检索了从建库至2013年6月的20个电子数据库。从五个领域（测试内容、反应过程、内部结构、与其他变量的关系以及结果）评估效度。在识别出的23961条引文中，纳入了24种工具。基于质量可靠的研究，大多数工具都展示了有效的评分程序、可重复性和区分效度。这些工具缺乏因子效度和预测效度，也没有标准化的常模。需要对现有工具进行进一步完善，尤其是在内容效度和结果效度方面。本综述中报告的工具的综合效度证据和描述可能会指导临床医生和研究人员选择合适的工具。
