• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伦敦奥运公园备选遗留方案的综合废物管理系统的生命周期评估。

Life cycle assessment of integrated waste management systems for alternative legacy scenarios of the London Olympic Park.

机构信息

Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, Torrington Place, London WC1E 7JE, UK.

Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, Torrington Place, London WC1E 7JE, UK.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2015 Jun;40:157-66. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.03.017. Epub 2015 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.03.017
PMID:25837786
Abstract

This paper presents the results of the life cycle assessment (LCA) of 10 integrated waste management systems (IWMSs) for 3 potential post-event site design scenarios of the London Olympic Park. The aim of the LCA study is to evaluate direct and indirect emissions resulting from various treatment options of municipal solid waste (MSW) annually generated on site together with avoided emissions resulting from energy, materials and nutrients recovery. IWMSs are modelled using GaBi v6.0 Product Sustainability software and results are presented based on the CML (v.Nov-10) characterisation method. The results show that IWMSs with advanced thermal treatment (ATT) and incineration with energy recovery have the lowest Global Warming Potential (GWP) than IWMSs where landfill is the primary waste treatment process. This is due to higher direct emissions and lower avoided emissions from the landfill process compared to the emissions from the thermal treatment processes. LCA results demonstrate that significant environmental savings are achieved through substitution of virgin materials with recycled ones. The results of the sensitivity analysis carried out for IWMS 1 shows that increasing recycling rate by 5%, 10% and 15% compared to the baseline scenario can reduce GWP by 8%, 17% and 25% respectively. Sensitivity analysis also shows how changes in waste composition affect the overall result of the system. The outcomes of such assessments provide decision-makers with fundamental information regarding the environmental impacts of different waste treatment options necessary for sustainable waste management planning.

摘要

本文介绍了针对伦敦奥林匹克公园 3 个潜在赛后场地设计场景的 10 种综合废物管理系统 (IWMS) 的生命周期评估 (LCA) 结果。LCA 研究的目的是评估每年在现场产生的城市固体废物 (MSW) 的各种处理方案的直接和间接排放,以及能源、材料和营养物质回收所避免的排放。IWMS 使用 GaBi v6.0 产品可持续性软件进行建模,并根据 CML(v.Nov-10)特征化方法展示结果。结果表明,与将垃圾填埋作为主要废物处理工艺的 IWMS 相比,具有先进热处理 (ATT) 和带有能量回收的焚烧的 IWMS 具有最低的全球变暖潜能值 (GWP)。这是由于与热处理工艺相比,垃圾填埋过程中的直接排放量较高,而避免排放量较低。LCA 结果表明,通过用回收材料替代原始材料,可以实现显著的环境节约。对 IWMS1 进行的敏感性分析的结果表明,与基线情景相比,将回收利用率提高 5%、10%和 15%,分别可以减少 8%、17%和 25%的 GWP。敏感性分析还显示了废物组成的变化如何影响系统的整体结果。此类评估的结果为决策者提供了有关不同废物处理方案的环境影响的基本信息,这是可持续废物管理规划所必需的。

相似文献

1
Life cycle assessment of integrated waste management systems for alternative legacy scenarios of the London Olympic Park.伦敦奥运公园备选遗留方案的综合废物管理系统的生命周期评估。
Waste Manag. 2015 Jun;40:157-66. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.03.017. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
2
Assessing the environmental sustainability of energy recovery from municipal solid waste in the UK.评估英国城市固体废物能源回收的环境可持续性。
Waste Manag. 2016 Apr;50:346-63. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.02.010. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
3
Life cycle assessments of municipal solid waste management systems: a comparative analysis of selected peer-reviewed literature.城市固体废物管理系统的生命周期评估:对部分同行评审文献的比较分析
Environ Int. 2009 Nov;35(8):1256-66. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2009.07.009. Epub 2009 Aug 13.
4
Projecting the environmental profile of Singapore's landfill activities: Comparisons of present and future scenarios based on LCA.预测新加坡垃圾填埋活动的环境概况:基于生命周期评价的当前和未来情景比较。
Waste Manag. 2012 May;32(5):890-900. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.12.010. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
5
Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management with regard to greenhouse gas emissions: case study of Tianjin, China.关于温室气体排放的城市固体废物管理生命周期评估:中国天津的案例研究
Sci Total Environ. 2009 Feb 15;407(5):1517-26. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.11.007. Epub 2008 Dec 9.
6
Life cycle assessment of potential municipal solid waste management strategies for Mumbai, India.印度孟买潜在城市固体废物管理策略的生命周期评估
Waste Manag Res. 2017 Jan;35(1):79-91. doi: 10.1177/0734242X16675683. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
7
Environmental assessment of waste management in Greenland: current practice and potential future developments.格陵兰岛废物管理的环境评估:当前实践和未来潜在发展。
Waste Manag Res. 2013 May;31(5):502-9. doi: 10.1177/0734242X13482175. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
8
Comparison of municipal solid waste treatment technologies from a life cycle perspective in China.从生命周期角度对中国城市固体废物处理技术的比较。
Waste Manag Res. 2014 Jan;32(1):13-23. doi: 10.1177/0734242X13507311. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
9
A historical perspective of Global Warming Potential from Municipal Solid Waste Management.从城市固体废物管理角度看全球变暖潜能值的历史演变
Waste Manag. 2013 Sep;33(9):1926-33. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.04.016. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
10
How should greenhouse gas emissions be taken into account in the decision making of municipal solid waste management procurements? A case study of the South Karelia region, Finland.在城市固体废物管理采购的决策过程中,应如何考虑温室气体排放?芬兰南卡累利阿地区的案例研究。
Waste Manag. 2015 Aug;42:196-207. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.03.040. Epub 2015 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
COVID-19 Creating another problem? Sustainable solution for PPE disposal through LCA approach.新冠疫情引发了另一个问题?通过生命周期评估法实现个人防护装备处置的可持续解决方案。
Environ Dev Sustain. 2021;23(6):9418-9432. doi: 10.1007/s10668-020-01033-0. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
2
Renewable energy from solid waste: life cycle analysis and social welfare.来自固体废物的可再生能源:生命周期分析与社会福利
Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2020 Nov;85:106469. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106469. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
3
Life cycle modeling for environmental management: a review of trends and linkages.
生命周期建模在环境管理中的应用:趋势与关联综述。
Environ Monit Assess. 2019 Dec 17;192(1):51. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-8026-7.