• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The extremal quotient in small-area variation analysis.小区域变异分析中的极值商
Health Serv Res. 1989 Dec;24(5):665-84.
2
Small-area variations in rates of hospitalization and surgery within Rhode Island.罗德岛州内住院率和手术率的小区域差异。
Am J Prev Med. 1987 Mar-Apr;3(2):101-9.
3
Control limits for p control charts with small subgroup sizes.小子组容量的p控制图的控制限
Qual Manag Health Care. 2007 Apr-Jun;16(2):123-9. doi: 10.1097/01.QMH.0000267449.32629.b1.
4
Small area variations in health care delivery in Maryland.马里兰州医疗服务提供中的小区域差异。
Health Serv Res. 1995 Jun;30(2):295-317.
5
[The parasite capacity of the host population].[宿主群体的寄生虫感染能力]
Parazitologiia. 2002 Jan-Feb;36(1):48-59.
6
Comparing variation across European countries: building geographical areas to provide sounder estimates.比较欧洲国家间的差异:构建地理区域以提供更可靠的估计。
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Feb;25 Suppl 1:8-14. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku229.
7
Small area variation analysis. Methods for comparing several diagnosis-related groups.小区域变异分析。比较多个诊断相关组的方法。
Med Care. 1993 May;31(5 Suppl):YS45-53.
8
Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality.美国癌症协会关于空气污染颗粒与死亡率关系研究的长期随访及空间分析
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2009 May(140):5-114; discussion 115-36.
9
[Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].[意大利关于空气污染短期影响研究的荟萃分析]
Epidemiol Prev. 2001 Mar-Apr;25(2 Suppl):1-71.
10
Sampling--how big a sample?抽样——样本该多大?
J Forensic Sci. 1999 Jul;44(4):750-60.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring the level of compulsory hospitalisation in mental health care: The performance of different measures across areas and over time.测量精神卫生保健中的强制住院水平:不同措施在不同地区和不同时间的表现。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2021 Sep;30(3):e1881. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1881. Epub 2021 May 25.
2
The Effect of Geographic Units of Analysis on Measuring Geographic Variation in Medical Services Utilization.分析地理单位对衡量医疗服务利用地理差异的影响。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2016 Jul;49(4):230-9. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.16.034.
3
Is there much variation in variation? Revisiting statistics of small area variation in health services research.变异中存在很大的变异吗?重新审视卫生服务研究中小区域变异的统计学问题。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Apr 2;9:60. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-60.
4
Regional variations in the use of home care services in Ontario, 1993/95.1993/95年安大略省家庭护理服务使用情况的地区差异。
CMAJ. 1999 Aug 24;161(4):376-80.
5
Distribution of physicians in Ontario. Where are there too few or too many family physicians and general practitioners?安大略省医生的分布情况。哪些地区家庭医生和全科医生数量过少或过多?
Can Fam Physician. 1997 Apr;43:677-83, 733.
6
[Regional variations in health services: various methodological problems].[卫生服务的地区差异:各种方法学问题]
Soz Praventivmed. 1996;41(2):63-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01323084.
7
Analysis of variations in mortality rates with small numbers.小数量死亡率变化分析
Health Serv Res. 1994 Oct;29(4):461-71.
8
What is too much variation? The null hypothesis in small-area analysis.多大的变异算过大?小区域分析中的零假设。
Health Serv Res. 1990 Feb;24(6):741-71.
9
Testing the null hypothesis in small area analysis.在小区域分析中检验原假设。
Health Serv Res. 1992 Aug;27(3):267-94.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring the quality of medical care through vital statistics based on hospital service areas; I. Comparative study of appendectomy rates.基于医院服务区域通过生命统计数据衡量医疗质量;I. 阑尾切除术率的比较研究。
Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1952 Mar;42(3):276-86. doi: 10.2105/ajph.42.3.276.
2
Iowa employers use small area analysis in benefits reform.
Bus Health. 1986 Sep;3(9):14-6.
3
Surgical utilization in the U.S.A.美国的外科手术利用率
Med Care. 1980 Sep;18(9):883-92. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198009000-00002.
4
Small-area variations in the use of common surgical procedures: an international comparison of New England, England, and Norway.常见外科手术使用情况的小区域差异:新英格兰、英格兰和挪威的国际比较。
N Engl J Med. 1982 Nov 18;307(21):1310-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198211183072104.
5
Variations in medical care among small areas.小区域间医疗服务的差异。
Sci Am. 1982 Apr;246(4):120-34. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0482-120.
6
Regional variations in the use of common surgical procedures: within and between England and Wales, Canada and the United States of America.常见外科手术使用情况的地区差异:英格兰与威尔士、加拿大以及美利坚合众国各自内部及相互之间的差异
Soc Sci Med A. 1981 May;15(3 Pt 1):273-88. doi: 10.1016/0271-7123(81)90011-0.
7
Assessing existing technologies: the Manitoba study of common surgical procedures.评估现有技术:曼尼托巴省常见外科手术研究
Med Care. 1983 Apr;21(4):454-62. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198304000-00008.
8
The need for assessing the outcome of common medical practices.评估常见医疗实践结果的必要性。
Annu Rev Public Health. 1980;1:277-95. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.01.050180.001425.
9
Community correlates of hospital use.医院使用情况的社区相关因素。
Health Serv Res. 1984 Aug;19(3):333-55.
10
Hysterectomy: variations in rates across small areas and across physicians' practices.子宫切除术:小区域间及医生执业情况的手术率差异
Am J Public Health. 1984 Apr;74(4):327-35. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.4.327.

小区域变异分析中的极值商

The extremal quotient in small-area variation analysis.

作者信息

Kazandjian V A, Durance P W, Schork M A

机构信息

Maryland Hospital Association, Lutherville 21093-6087.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 1989 Dec;24(5):665-84.

PMID:2584039
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1065591/
Abstract

This article reviews the current small-area variation analysis (SAVA) approach to population-based rates of surgery, and describes a new method for ascertaining variance based on the beta-binomial probability distribution of small-area rates. The critical review of the current SAVA approach focuses (1) on how incidence rates are calculated, and (2) on how the significance of the observed magnitude between the largest and smallest rates (i.e., the external quotient) is ascertained. While reducing the problems of calculating rates by considering only certain operative procedures, the new method addresses the current inadequacies of ascertaining significant differences among small areas. Not only does it correctly assess likelihood of an extermal quotient, it also can determine the particular area's rate, producing an unlikely extermal quotient. The method evaluates the probability that the observed magnitude of the extremal quotient is due solely to chance and study design effects, and tables of these probabilities are available for the method's application. A mathematical model, based on a combination of the binomial and beta distributions, uses (1) the sample size, (2) the average of the areas' rates, (3) the variance among the rates, and (4) a specific quotient level to determine the probability of observing the quotient by chance. After computerizing this calculation, probability tables for reasonable values of these four parameters are generated. In addition to looking at just one quotient for each sample, the probability tables facilitate the easy examination of intermediate quotients when the extremal quotient is unlikely due to chance. By alternatively ignoring the highest and lowest rates, two new quotients can be produced and tested. Given that one of these two quotients is likely due to chance, the excluded rate (i.e., producing the unlikely extremal quotient) can be classified as an outliner, and the associated small area should be the focus of more detailed investigation. The probability tables reveal that the external quotient is not the appropriate statistic to be applied in studies where many small areas are to be included. The probability of seeing even a "large" extremal quotient simply by chance rapidly approaches one as the sample size increases. However, an extremal quotient modeled from a beta-binomial distribution can be useful for studies with small sample sizes (e.g., six counties). The use of this beta-binomial model for small-area rates provides a new method of designing and evaluating small-area studies where costs or domain limit the number of areas under consideration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

本文回顾了当前基于人群的手术率小区域变异分析(SAVA)方法,并描述了一种基于小区域率的贝塔二项式概率分布确定方差的新方法。对当前SAVA方法的批判性回顾集中在:(1)发病率是如何计算的;(2)如何确定最大率和最小率之间观察到的幅度(即外部商数)的显著性。新方法在通过仅考虑某些手术程序减少计算率问题的同时,解决了当前确定小区域间显著差异的不足。它不仅能正确评估外部商数的可能性,还能确定特定区域的率,得出不太可能的外部商数。该方法评估观察到的极值商数幅度仅由机会和研究设计效应导致的概率,并且有这些概率表供该方法应用。一个基于二项式和贝塔分布组合的数学模型,使用(1)样本量、(2)区域率的平均值、(3)率之间的方差以及(4)一个特定的商数水平来确定偶然观察到该商数的概率。将此计算计算机化后,会生成这四个参数合理值的概率表。除了查看每个样本的一个商数外,当极值商数不太可能是偶然导致时,概率表便于轻松检查中间商数。通过交替忽略最高和最低率,可以生成并测试两个新的商数。鉴于这两个商数之一可能是偶然导致的,被排除的率(即产生不太可能的极值商数的率)可被归类为异常值,相关的小区域应成为更详细调查的重点。概率表表明,在要纳入许多小区域的研究中,外部商数不是适用的统计量。随着样本量增加,仅仅偶然看到即使是“大”的极值商数的概率会迅速接近1。然而,由贝塔二项式分布建模的极值商数对于小样本量的研究(如六个县)可能有用。将此贝塔二项式模型用于小区域率提供了一种设计和评估小区域研究的新方法,在这些研究中成本或范围限制了所考虑区域的数量。(摘要截选至400字)