Shepard D S, Cooper G S
Institute for Health Research, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115.
Am J Prev Med. 1987 Mar-Apr;3(2):101-9.
We analyzed variations in the usage rates and costs of 13 surgical procedures among 37 cities and towns in the state of Rhode Island. To compare different operations and years, we defined the deviation index, a percentage indicator similar to the coefficient of variation, but with chance variation removed. Tonsillectomy and disc excision were the procedures for which rates varied most around the state average; their deviation indexes for 1981 were 40.5 percent and 38.9 percent, respectively. In 14 areas, rates for one of these two procedures (standardized for age and sex) were significantly (p less than .01) above or below the state average; such outlying observations would have been expected for only one area if rates had been uniform statewide. To indicate the relative amount of surgery in an area combining rates for all 13 procedures, we computed the area's surgical index. This index, the average of the ratios of observed to expected cases (based on standardized statewide rates), doubled from the lowest- to the highest-rate areas. Overall, surgical hospital days, nonsurgical days, total hospital days, and hospital costs (all per 1,000 population) doubled from lowest- to highest-rate areas. If the rates of these 13 surgical procedures could be lowered in high-rate areas to not more than 20 percent above the state average, usage could drop by 4 percent. We conclude that even within the small state of Rhode Island, surgical practice varies considerably across communities. Identifying and studying areas with extremely high or low rates should enable more explicit consideration of the indications for surgery and perhaps lead to lower costs for medical care.
我们分析了罗德岛州37个城镇中13种外科手术的使用率和费用变化情况。为了比较不同手术和不同年份的情况,我们定义了偏差指数,这是一个类似于变异系数的百分比指标,但去除了随机变异因素。扁桃体切除术和椎间盘切除术是全州平均水平周围使用率变化最大的手术;它们在1981年的偏差指数分别为40.5%和38.9%。在14个地区,这两种手术之一(按年龄和性别标准化)的使用率显著高于(p小于0.01)或低于全州平均水平;如果全州使用率统一,预计只有一个地区会出现这种异常情况。为了表明一个地区所有13种手术的综合使用率,我们计算了该地区的手术指数。这个指数是观察病例与预期病例之比(基于全州标准化率)的平均值,从最低使用率地区到最高使用率地区增加了一倍。总体而言,外科住院天数、非外科住院天数、总住院天数以及住院费用(均按每1000人口计算)从最低使用率地区到最高使用率地区都增加了一倍。如果高使用率地区这13种外科手术的使用率能够降低到不超过全州平均水平的20%以上,使用量可能会下降4%。我们得出结论,即使在罗德岛这个小州内,不同社区的外科手术实践也存在很大差异。识别和研究高使用率或低使用率地区应该能够更明确地考虑手术适应症,或许还能降低医疗费用。