Suppr超能文献

血液加温与溶血:一项荟萃分析的系统评价

Blood Warming and Hemolysis: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Poder Thomas G, Nonkani Wendyam G, Tsakeu Leponkouo Élyonore

机构信息

UETMIS & CRCHUS, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.

CERDI, Université d'Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

出版信息

Transfus Med Rev. 2015 Jul;29(3):172-80. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Mar 24.

Abstract

The use of fluid warmers during blood transfusion is recommended to avoid inducing hypothermia and its harmful effects. Fluid warmers offered by manufacturers can reach temperatures of 43°C. However, the recommendations of national regulatory organizations do not clearly indicate the maximum heating temperature in relation to the risk of hemolysis. To fill this gap, we conducted a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. To match clinical practice, this review was limited to fluid warmers that used contact heating; thus, studies that used radiofrequency or microwave heating were excluded. Twenty-four observational studies were included, 17 of which were the subject of a meta-analysis. A preliminary descriptive analysis indicated that multiple factors can influence the level of hemolysis during blood heating with a liquid warmer, including blood age, anticoagulant type, duration of exposure to heat, stirring the blood during heating, and various elements of the circuit through which blood flows (eg, type of infusion pump with pressure and flow, type of microfilter, and type of tubing). Moreover, the duration between sampling and hemolysis assay was a source of heterogeneity among studies, as were the initial free hemoglobin levels in the various experiments. In general, the increase generated by each of these factors other than temperature appears to have been limited except for blood age, which is an important parameter of hemolysis, the length of exposure to heat, and, in some studies, the type of infusion pump used. Regarding the meta-analysis, at temperatures at or less than 43°C and even up to 45-46°C, it appears that blood heating is safe and causes hemolysis only in clinically negligible proportions.

摘要

建议在输血过程中使用液体加温器,以避免诱发体温过低及其有害影响。制造商提供的液体加温器可达到43°C的温度。然而,国家监管机构的建议并未明确指出与溶血风险相关的最高加热温度。为了填补这一空白,我们进行了一项带有荟萃分析的文献系统综述。为了符合临床实践,本综述仅限于使用接触式加热的液体加温器;因此,排除了使用射频或微波加热的研究。纳入了24项观察性研究,其中17项是荟萃分析的对象。初步描述性分析表明,多个因素可影响使用液体加温器加热血液期间的溶血水平,包括血液保存时间、抗凝剂类型、受热时间、加热期间搅拌血液以及血液流经的回路的各种元件(例如,具有压力和流量的输液泵类型、微滤器类型和 tubing 类型)。此外,采样与溶血测定之间的持续时间是各研究之间异质性的一个来源,各实验中的初始游离血红蛋白水平也是如此。一般来说,除了作为溶血重要参数的血液保存时间、受热时间以及在某些研究中使用的输液泵类型外,这些因素中除温度外的每一个因素所产生的增加似乎都有限。关于荟萃分析,在43°C及以下甚至高达45 - 46°C的温度下,血液加热似乎是安全的,并且仅在临床上可忽略不计的比例下导致溶血。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验