Suppr超能文献

计算机辅助手术并未提高胸腰椎后路经皮椎弓根螺钉置入的准确性:I 级创伤中心 2003 枚椎弓根螺钉的回顾性分析。

Computer-aided surgery does not increase the accuracy of dorsal pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbar spine: a retrospective analysis of 2,003 pedicle screws in a level I trauma center.

机构信息

Centre for Orthopaedic Trauma and Spine Surgery, Donau-Ries Hospital Donauwörth, Donauwörth, Germany.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Global Spine J. 2015 Apr;5(2):93-101. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1396430. Epub 2014 Dec 12.

Abstract

Study Design A retrospective analysis of a prospective database. Objective Meta-analyses suggest that computer-assisted systems can increase the accuracy of pedicle screw placement for dorsal spinal fusion procedures. The results of further meta-analyses report that in the thoracic spine, both the methods have comparable placement accuracy. These studies are limited due to an abundance of screw classification systems. The aim of this study was to assess the placement accuracy and potentially influencing factors of three-dimensionally navigated versus conventionally inserted pedicle screws. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of a prospective database at a level I trauma center of pedicle screw placement (computer-navigated versus traditionally placed) for dorsal spinal stabilizations. The cases spanned a 5.5-year study period (January 1, 2005, to June 30, 2010). The perforations of the pedicle were differentiated in three grades based on the postoperative computed tomography. Results The overall placement accuracy was 86% in the conventional group versus 79% in the computer-navigated group (grade 0). The computer-navigated procedures were superior in the lumbar spine and the conventional procedures were superior in the thoracic spine, but both failed to be of statistical significance. The level of experience of the performing surgeon and the patient's body mass index did not influence the placement accuracy. The only significant influence was the spinal segment: the higher the spinal level where the fusion was performed, the more likely the screw was displaced. Conclusions The computer-navigated and conventional methods are both safe procedures to place transpedicular screws at the traumatized thoracic and lumbar spine. At the moment, three-dimensionally based navigation does not significantly increase the placement accuracy.

摘要

研究设计

一项前瞻性数据库的回顾性分析。目的:荟萃分析表明,计算机辅助系统可以提高背侧脊柱融合手术中椎弓根螺钉放置的准确性。进一步荟萃分析的结果表明,在胸椎中,这两种方法的放置准确性相当。这些研究受到大量螺钉分类系统的限制。本研究旨在评估三维导航与传统插入椎弓根螺钉的放置准确性和潜在影响因素。方法:这是在一级创伤中心对背侧脊柱稳定的椎弓根螺钉放置(计算机导航与传统放置)进行前瞻性数据库的回顾性分析。病例跨越了 5.5 年的研究期(2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2010 年 6 月 30 日)。根据术后计算机断层扫描,将椎弓根的穿孔分为三个等级。结果:传统组的总体放置准确性为 86%,而计算机导航组为 79%(等级 0)。在腰椎中,计算机导航程序更优越,而在胸椎中,传统程序更优越,但两者均无统计学意义。手术医生的经验水平和患者的体重指数均未影响放置准确性。唯一显著的影响因素是脊柱节段:融合部位越高,螺钉移位的可能性越大。结论:计算机导航和传统方法都是在创伤性胸腰椎放置经皮椎弓根螺钉的安全方法。目前,基于三维的导航并未显著提高放置准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1856/4369205/5386d6f26cd6/10-1055-s-0034-1396430-i1400066-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验