Conte Tania, Mitton Craig, Trenaman Logan M, Chavoshi Negar, Siden Harold
School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC ; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver, BC.
School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC ; Canuck Place Children's Hospice, Vancouver, BC.
CMAJ Open. 2015 Jan 13;3(1):E68-75. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20140044. eCollection 2015 Jan-Mar.
Pediatric palliative care is a relatively new and evolving field, and the cost of pediatric palliative care programs is unclear. We conducted a systematic review to compare inpatient health care utilization and costs among children with life-threatening conditions who have accessed a pediatric palliative care program and those who have not.
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and LILACS databases from January 2000 to July 2013, as well as the grey literature, for experimental or observational studies that compared pediatric palliative care programs with usual care. Outcomes of interest included hospital admissions, length of stay and health care costs.
Of the 5193 records identified, we reviewed 109 in full and included 11 in our study. The overall quality of the studies was moderate to low. We observed mixed results for all outcomes. Compared with patients receiving usual care, fewer patients in the palliative care group had hospital admissions and fewer of those with cancer had planned hospital admissions. In contrast, no effects were observed regarding the overall number of hospital, emergency or outpatient admissions. Conflicting results were observed with regards to critical care utilization. Studies showed a trend toward shorter lengths of stay in hospital in the palliative care group. However, a single study that also considered inpatient time in hospice facilities found an increase in total length of stay, which showed a shift in the setting of health care utilization. We observed no conclusive trend in the effects on cost.
Evidence suggests that pediatric palliative care programs may result in a shift of utilization to other health care settings beyond hospital care. These settings should be considered when measuring resource utilization and costs.
儿科姑息治疗是一个相对较新且不断发展的领域,儿科姑息治疗项目的成本尚不清楚。我们进行了一项系统评价,以比较接入儿科姑息治疗项目的危及生命儿童与未接入该项目的儿童的住院医疗利用情况和成本。
我们检索了2000年1月至2013年7月的MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL和LILACS数据库以及灰色文献,以查找比较儿科姑息治疗项目与常规护理的实验性或观察性研究。感兴趣的结果包括住院次数、住院时间和医疗成本。
在识别出的5193条记录中,我们全面审查了109条,并在研究中纳入了11条。这些研究的总体质量为中等至低等。我们观察到所有结果的结果不一。与接受常规护理的患者相比,姑息治疗组的住院患者较少,癌症患者的计划性住院患者也较少。相比之下,在住院、急诊或门诊就诊的总数方面未观察到影响。在重症监护利用方面观察到相互矛盾的结果。研究表明,姑息治疗组的住院时间有缩短的趋势。然而,一项同时考虑临终关怀机构住院时间的研究发现总住院时间增加,这表明医疗利用环境发生了转变。我们在成本影响方面未观察到确凿趋势。
证据表明,儿科姑息治疗项目可能导致医疗利用向医院护理以外的其他医疗环境转移。在衡量资源利用和成本时应考虑这些环境。