Suppr超能文献

埃塞俄比亚、肯尼亚和赞比亚不同社区卫生战略中社区综合病例管理的商品成本及人力资源需求。

Costing commodity and human resource needs for integrated community case management in thie differing community health strategies of Ethiopia, Kenya and Zambia.

作者信息

Nefdt Rory, Ribaira Eric, Diallo Khassoum

出版信息

Ethiop Med J. 2014 Oct;52 Suppl 3:137-49.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To ensure correct and appropriate funding is available, there is a need to estimate resource needs for improved planning and implementation of integrated Community Case Management (iCCM).

OBJECTIVE

To compare and estimate costs for commodity and human resource needs for iCCM, based on treatment coverage rates, bottlenecks and national targets in Ethiopia, Kenya and Zambia from 2014 to 2016.

METHODS

Resource needs were estimated using Ministry of Health (MoH) targets fronm 2014 to 2016 for implementation of case management of pneumonia, diarrhea and malaria through iCCM based on epidemiological, demographic, economic, intervention coverage and other health system parameters. Bottleneck analysis adjusted cost estimates against system barriers. Ethiopia, Kenya and Zambia were chosen to compare differences in iCCM costs in different programmatic implementation landscapes.

RESULTS

Coverage treatment rates through iCCM are lowest in Ethiopia, followed by Kenya and Zambia, but Ethiopia had the greatest increases between 2009 and 2012. Deployment of health extension workers (HEWs) in Ethiopia is more advanced compared to Kenya and Zambia, which have fewer equivalent cadres (called commu- nity health workers (CHWs)) covering a smaller proportion of the population. Between 2014 and 2016, the propor- tion of treatments through iCCM compared to health centres are set to increase from 30% to 81% in Ethiopia, 1% to 18% in Kenya and 3% to 22% in Zambia. The total estimated cost of iCCM for these three years are USD 75,531,376 for Ethiopia, USD 19,839,780 for Kenya and USD 33,667,742 for Zambia. Projected per capita expen- diture for 2016 is USD 0.28 for Ethiopia, USD 0.20 in Kenya and USD 0.98 in Zambia. Commodity costs for pneumonia and diarrhea were a small fraction of the total iCCM budget for all three countries (less than 3%), while around 80% of the costs related to human resources.

CONCLUSION

Analysis of coverage, demography and epidemiology data improves estimates of fimding requirements for iCCM. Bottleneck analysis adjusts cost estimates by including system barriers, thus reflecting a more accurate estimate of potential resource utilization. Adding pneumonia and diarrhea interventions to existing large scale community-based malaria case management programs is likely to require relatively small and nationally affordable investments. iCCM can be implemented for USD 0.09 to 0.98 per capita per annum, depending on the stage of scale-up and targets set by the MoH.

摘要

背景

为确保有正确且适当的资金可用,需要估算资源需求,以改进综合社区病例管理(iCCM)的规划与实施。

目的

根据2014年至2016年埃塞俄比亚、肯尼亚和赞比亚的治疗覆盖率、瓶颈问题及国家目标,比较并估算iCCM的商品和人力资源需求成本。

方法

利用卫生部2014年至2016年的目标,基于流行病学、人口统计学、经济、干预覆盖率及其他卫生系统参数,通过iCCM对肺炎、腹泻和疟疾实施病例管理来估算资源需求。瓶颈分析针对系统障碍调整成本估算。选择埃塞俄比亚、肯尼亚和赞比亚以比较不同项目实施情况中iCCM成本的差异。

结果

通过iCCM的治疗覆盖率在埃塞俄比亚最低,其次是肯尼亚和赞比亚,但埃塞俄比亚在2009年至2012年间增幅最大。与肯尼亚和赞比亚相比,埃塞俄比亚卫生推广工作者(HEW)的部署更为先进,后两者同等类型的干部(称为社区卫生工作者(CHW))较少,覆盖的人口比例也较小。在2014年至2016年间,与卫生中心相比,通过iCCM进行治疗的比例在埃塞俄比亚将从30%增至81%,在肯尼亚从1%增至18%,在赞比亚从3%增至22%。这三年iCCM的总估算成本,埃塞俄比亚为7553.;1376万美元,肯尼亚为1983.;978万美元,赞比亚为3366.;7742万美元。2016年预计人均支出,埃塞俄比亚为0.28美元,肯尼亚为0.20美元,赞比亚为0.98美元。在所有三个国家,肺炎和腹泻的商品成本仅占iCCM总预算的一小部分(不到3%),而约80%的成本与人力资源相关。

结论

对覆盖率。人口统计学和流行病学数据的分析改进了对iCCM资金需求的估算。瓶颈分析通过纳入系统障碍来调整成本估算,从而更准确地反映潜在资源利用情况。在现有的大规模社区疟疾病例管理项目中增加肺炎和腹泻干预措施,可能只需相对较少且国家负担得起的投资。根据扩大规模阶段和卫生部设定的目标,iCCM每年人均实施成本可为0.09美元至0.98美元。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验