Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Jul;12(7):1534-40. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
Numerous electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria have been proposed to identify localization of outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias (OT-VAs); however, in some cases, it is difficult to accurately localize the origin of OT-VA using the surface ECG.
The purpose of this study was to assess a simple criterion for localization of OT-VAs during electrophysiology study.
We measured the interval from the onset of the earliest QRS complex of premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) to the distal right ventricular apical signal (the QRS-RVA interval) in 66 patients (31 men aged 53.3 ± 14.0 years; right ventricular outflow tract [RVOT] origin in 37) referred for ablation of symptomatic outflow tract PVCs. We prospectively validated this criterion in 39 patients (22 men aged 52 ± 15 years; RVOT origin in 19).
Compared with patients with RVOT PVCs, the QRS-RVA interval was significantly longer in patients with left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) PVCs (70 ± 14 vs 33.4±10 ms, P < .001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that a QRS-RVA interval ≥49 ms had sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 100%, 94.6%, 93.5%, and 100%, respectively, for prediction of an LVOT origin. The same analysis in the validation cohort showed sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 94.7%, 95%, 95%, and 94.7%, respectively. When these data were combined, a QRS-RVA interval ≥49 ms had sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 98%, 94.6%, 94.1%, and 98.1%, respectively, for prediction of an LVOT origin.
A QRS-RVA interval ≥49 ms suggests an LVOT origin. The QRS-RVA interval is a simple and accurate criterion for differentiating the origin of outflow tract arrhythmia during electrophysiology study; however, the accuracy of this criterion in identifying OT-VA from the right coronary cusp is limited.
已经提出了许多心电图(ECG)标准来识别流出道室性心律失常(OT-VA)的定位; 然而,在某些情况下,使用体表心电图很难准确地定位 OT-VA 的起源。
本研究旨在评估电生理研究中定位 OT-VA 的简单标准。
我们测量了 66 例因症状性流出道 PVC 消融而接受消融治疗的患者(31 例男性,年龄 53.3 ± 14.0 岁; 右室流出道 [RVOT]起源 37 例)中提前收缩(PVCs)最早 QRS 复合波到心尖远端右心室信号(QRS-RVA 间期)的间隔。我们前瞻性地在 39 例患者(22 例男性,年龄 52 ± 15 岁; RVOT 起源 19 例)中验证了这一标准。
与 RVOT PVC 患者相比,左室流出道(LVOT)PVC 患者的 QRS-RVA 间隔明显更长(70 ± 14 与 33.4±10 ms,P <.001)。接受者操作特征分析显示,QRS-RVA 间隔≥49 ms 对预测 LVOT 起源的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为 100%、94.6%、93.5%和 100%。在验证队列中的相同分析显示,敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为 94.7%、95%、95%和 94.7%。当这些数据合并时,QRS-RVA 间隔≥49 ms 对预测 LVOT 起源的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为 98%、94.6%、94.1%和 98.1%。
QRS-RVA 间隔≥49 ms 提示 LVOT 起源。QRS-RVA 间隔是电生理研究中区分流出道心律失常起源的简单而准确的标准; 然而,该标准在识别右冠状动脉瓣 OT-VA 方面的准确性有限。