Ong Mei-Sing, Mandl Kenneth D
Mei-Sing Ong is a research fellow at Boston Children's Hospital, in Massachusetts, and a research fellow at the Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, in Sydney, Australia.
Kenneth D. Mandl (
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Apr;34(4):576-83. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1087.
Populationwide mammography screening has been associated with a substantial rise in false-positive mammography findings and breast cancer overdiagnosis. However, there is a lack of current data on the associated costs in the United States. We present costs due to false-positive mammograms and breast cancer overdiagnoses among women ages 40-59, based on expenditure data from a major US health care insurance plan for 702,154 women in the years 2011-13. The average expenditures for each false-positive mammogram, invasive breast cancer, and ductal carcinoma in situ in the twelve months following diagnosis were $852, $51,837 and $12,369, respectively. This translates to a national cost of $4 billion each year. The costs associated with false-positive mammograms and breast cancer overdiagnoses appear to be much higher than previously documented. Screening has the potential to save lives. However, the economic impact of false-positive mammography results and breast cancer overdiagnoses must be considered in the debate about the appropriate populations for screening.
全人群乳腺钼靶筛查与乳腺钼靶检查假阳性结果和乳腺癌过度诊断的大幅增加有关。然而,目前美国缺乏关于相关成本的数据。我们根据美国一项主要医疗保险计划在2011 - 2013年期间对702,154名40 - 59岁女性的支出数据,呈现了因乳腺钼靶检查假阳性和乳腺癌过度诊断所产生的成本。诊断后十二个月内,每次乳腺钼靶检查假阳性、浸润性乳腺癌和原位导管癌的平均支出分别为852美元、51,837美元和12,369美元。这相当于每年全国成本为40亿美元。与乳腺钼靶检查假阳性和乳腺癌过度诊断相关的成本似乎比之前记录的要高得多。筛查有可能挽救生命。然而,在关于哪些人群适合筛查的辩论中,必须考虑乳腺钼靶检查假阳性结果和乳腺癌过度诊断的经济影响。