Hwang E Shelley, Hyslop Terry, Lynch Thomas, Ryser Marc D, Weiss Anna, Wolf Anna, Norris Kelsey, Witten Meredith, Grimm Lars, Schnitt Stuart, Badve Sunil, Factor Rachel, Frank Elizabeth, Collyar Deborah, Basila Desiree, Pinto Donna, Watson Mark A, West Robert, Davies Louise, Donovan Jenny L, Shimada Ayako, Li Yutong, Li Yan, Bennett Antonia V, Rosenberg Shoshana, Marks Jeffrey, Winer Eric, Boisvert Marc, Giuliano Armando, Larson Kelsey E, Yost Kathleen, McAuliffe Priscilla F, Krie Amy, Tamirisa Nina, Carey Lisa A, Thompson Alastair M, Partridge Ann H
Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
JAMA. 2025 Mar 18;333(11):972-980. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.26698.
Active monitoring for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast has been proposed as an alternative to guideline-concordant care, but the safety of this approach is unknown.
To compare rates of invasive cancer in patients with low-risk DCIS receiving active monitoring vs guideline-concordant care.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective, randomized noninferiority trial enrolling 995 women aged 40 years or older with a new diagnosis of hormone receptor-positive grade 1 or grade 2 DCIS without invasive cancer at 100 US Alliance Cancer Cooperative Group clinical trial sites from 2017 to 2023.
Participants were randomized to receive active monitoring (follow-up every 6 months with breast imaging and physical examination; n = 484) or guideline-concordant care (surgery with or without radiation therapy; n = 473).
The primary outcome was 2-year cumulative risk of ipsilateral invasive cancer diagnosis, according to planned intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, with a noninferiority bound of 5%.
The median age of the 957 participants analyzed was 63.6 (95% CI, 55.5-70.5) years in the guideline-concordant care group and 63.7 (95% CI, 60.0-71.6) years in the active monitoring group. Overall, 15.7% of participants were Black and 75.0% were White. In this prespecified primary analysis, median follow-up was 36.9 months; 346 patients had surgery for DCIS, 264 in the guideline-concordant care group and 82 in the active monitoring group. Forty-six women were diagnosed with invasive cancer, 19 in the active monitoring group and 27 in the guideline-concordant care group. The 2-year Kaplan-Meier cumulative rate of ipsilateral invasive cancer was 4.2% in the active monitoring group vs 5.9% in the guideline-concordant care group, a difference of -1.7% (upper limit of the 95% CI, 0.95%), indicating that active monitoring is not inferior to guideline-concordant care. Invasive tumor characteristics did not differ significantly between groups.
Women with low-risk DCIS randomized to active monitoring did not have a higher rate of invasive cancer in the same breast at 2 years compared with those randomized to guideline-concordant care.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02926911.
对于乳腺低风险导管原位癌(DCIS),主动监测已被提议作为符合指南治疗的替代方案,但这种方法的安全性尚不清楚。
比较接受主动监测与符合指南治疗的低风险DCIS患者的浸润性癌发生率。
设计、设置和参与者:一项前瞻性、随机非劣效性试验,纳入了995名年龄在40岁及以上、2017年至2023年期间在美国癌症联合委员会100个临床试验点新诊断为激素受体阳性1级或2级DCIS且无浸润性癌的女性。
参与者被随机分配接受主动监测(每6个月进行乳腺成像和体格检查;n = 484)或符合指南的治疗(手术加或不加放疗;n = 473)。
主要结局是根据计划的意向性分析和符合方案分析得出的同侧浸润性癌诊断的2年累积风险,非劣效界值为5%。
在符合指南治疗组中,957名分析参与者的中位年龄为63.6(95%CI,55.5 - 70.5)岁,在主动监测组中为63.7(95%CI,60.0 - 71.6)岁。总体而言,15.7%的参与者为黑人,75.0%为白人。在这项预先设定的主要分析中,中位随访时间为36.9个月;346例患者因DCIS接受手术,符合指南治疗组264例,主动监测组82例。46名女性被诊断为浸润性癌,主动监测组19例,符合指南治疗组27例。主动监测组同侧浸润性癌的2年Kaplan-Meier累积发生率为4.2%,符合指南治疗组为5.9%,差异为-1.7%(95%CI上限,0.95%),表明主动监测不劣于符合指南的治疗。两组间浸润性肿瘤特征无显著差异。
与随机接受符合指南治疗的女性相比,随机接受主动监测的低风险DCIS女性在2年内同侧浸润性癌发生率没有更高。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02926911。