Che Yi-wen, Yao Ke-yu, Xi Yu-peng, Chen Zi-jie, Li Yong-le, Yu Ning, Zhai Shuang-qing
School of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China.
Chin J Integr Med. 2016 Apr;22(4):302-10. doi: 10.1007/s11655-015-2047-z. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
To assess the beneficial and adverse effects of Wendan Decoction (温胆汤, WDD) for the treatment of schizophrenia.
Five electronic databases were searched until May 2014, including the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, the Chinese Scientist Journal Database, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in the Cochrane Library. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing WDD against placebo, antipsychotic drugs, or WDD combined with antipsychotic drugs against antipsychotic drugs alone were included. Study selection, data extraction, quality assessment, and data analyses were conducted according to the Cochrane standards.
Thirteen RCTs (involving 1,174 patients) were included and the methodological quality was evaluated as generally low. The pooled results showed that WDD combined with antipsychotic drugs were more effective in clinical comprehensive effect, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale scores compared with antipsychotic drugs alone. However, WDD had less effectiveness compared with antipsychotics in clinical comprehensive effect; and WDD was not different from antipsychotic drugs for PANSS scores. The side effects were significantly reduced in the intervention group compared with the control group.
WDD appears to be effective on improving symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. However, due to poor methodological quality in the majority of the included trials, the potential benefit from WDD needs to be confirmed in rigorous trials and the design and reporting of trials should follow the international standards.
评估温胆汤治疗精神分裂症的有益和不良影响。
检索五个电子数据库至2014年5月,包括中国知网、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国科学期刊数据库、PubMed以及Cochrane图书馆中的Cochrane对照试验中央登记库。纳入比较温胆汤与安慰剂、抗精神病药物,或温胆汤联合抗精神病药物与单纯抗精神病药物的随机对照试验(RCT)。根据Cochrane标准进行研究选择、数据提取、质量评估和数据分析。
纳入13项RCT(涉及1174例患者),方法学质量总体评估为低。汇总结果显示,与单纯抗精神病药物相比,温胆汤联合抗精神病药物在临床综合疗效、阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)评分和简明精神病评定量表评分方面更有效。然而,在临床综合疗效方面,温胆汤与抗精神病药物相比效果较差;在PANSS评分方面,温胆汤与抗精神病药物无差异。与对照组相比,干预组的副作用明显减少。
温胆汤似乎对改善精神分裂症患者的症状有效。然而,由于纳入试验大多方法学质量较差,温胆汤的潜在益处需要在严格试验中得到证实,试验的设计和报告应遵循国际标准。