• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

构建并强化数据交换基础设施:来自灯塔社区的经验教训

Building and strengthening infrastructure for data exchange: lessons from the beacon communities.

作者信息

Torres Gretchen W, Swietek Karen, Ubri Petry S, Singer Rachel F, Lowell Kristina H, Miller Wilhelmine

机构信息

NORC at the University of Chicago.

出版信息

EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Sep 25;2(3):1092. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1092. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.13063/2327-9214.1092
PMID:25848619
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4371437/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Beacon Community Cooperative Agreement Program supports interventions, including care-delivery innovations, provider performance measurement and feedback initiatives, and tools for providers and consumers to enhance care. Using a learning health system framework, we examine the Beacon Communities' processes in building and strengthening health IT (HIT) infrastructures, specifically successes and challenges in sharing patient information to improve clinical care.

BACKGROUND

In 2010, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) launched the three-year program, which provided $250 million to 17 Beacon Communities to invest in HIT and health information exchange (HIE) infrastructure. Beacon Communities used this funding to develop and disseminate HIT-enabled quality improvement practices found effective in particular community and practice environments.

METHODS

NORC conducted 7 site visits, November 2012-March 2013, selecting Communities to represent diverse program features. From August-October 2013, NORC held discussions with the remaining 10 Communities. Following each visit or discussion, NORC summarized the information gathered, including transcripts, team observations, and other documents the Community provided, to facilitate a within-Community analysis of context and stakeholders, intervention strategies, enabling factors, and challenges.

RESULTS

Although each Community designed and implemented data-sharing strategies in a unique environment, similar challenges and enabling factors emerged across the Beacons. From a learning health system perspective, their strategies to build and strengthen data-sharing infrastructures address the following crosscutting priorities: promoting technical advances and innovations by helping providers adapt EHRs for data exchange and performance measurement with customizable IT and offering technical support to smaller, independent providers; engaging key stakeholders; and fostering transparent governance and stewardship of the infrastructure with neutral conveners.

CONCLUSION

While all the Communities developed or strengthened data-exchange infrastructure, each did this in a unique environment of existing health care market and legal factors. The Communities, however, encountered similar challenges and enabling factors. Organizations undertaking collaborative data sharing, performance measurement and clinical transformation can learn from the Beacon Communities' experience.

摘要

引言

灯塔社区合作协议项目支持多种干预措施,包括护理交付创新、医疗服务提供者绩效评估与反馈举措,以及为医疗服务提供者和消费者提供的用以提升护理水平的工具。我们运用学习型健康系统框架,审视灯塔社区在构建和强化健康信息技术(HIT)基础设施方面的流程,特别是在共享患者信息以改善临床护理方面的成功经验和面临的挑战。

背景

2010年,国家卫生信息技术协调办公室(ONC)启动了这项为期三年的项目,向17个灯塔社区提供了2.5亿美元,用于投资健康信息技术和健康信息交换(HIE)基础设施。灯塔社区利用这笔资金开发并推广了在特定社区和实践环境中被证明有效的、基于健康信息技术的质量改进实践。

方法

2012年11月至2013年3月,美国国家民意研究中心(NORC)进行了7次实地考察,挑选了具有不同项目特征的社区。2013年8月至10月,NORC与其余10个社区进行了讨论。每次考察或讨论之后,NORC都会总结收集到的信息,包括文字记录、团队观察结果以及社区提供的其他文件,以便对社区内部的背景和利益相关者、干预策略、促成因素和挑战进行分析。

结果

尽管每个社区都在独特的环境中设计并实施了数据共享策略,但在各个灯塔社区中出现了类似的挑战和促成因素。从学习型健康系统的角度来看,它们构建和强化数据共享基础设施的策略涉及以下几个贯穿各领域的优先事项:通过帮助医疗服务提供者采用可定制信息技术使电子健康记录(EHR)适应数据交换和绩效评估,并为规模较小的独立医疗服务提供者提供技术支持,来推动技术进步和创新;让关键利益相关者参与进来;以及通过中立的召集人促进基础设施的透明治理和管理。

结论

虽然所有社区都开发或强化了数据交换基础设施,但每个社区都是在现有的医疗保健市场和法律因素的独特环境中进行的。然而,这些社区遇到了类似的挑战和促成因素。开展协作数据共享、绩效评估和临床转型的组织可以借鉴灯塔社区的经验。

相似文献

1
Building and strengthening infrastructure for data exchange: lessons from the beacon communities.构建并强化数据交换基础设施:来自灯塔社区的经验教训
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Sep 25;2(3):1092. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1092. eCollection 2014.
2
Data governance and data sharing agreements for community-wide health information exchange: lessons from the beacon communities.社区范围健康信息交换的数据治理与数据共享协议:来自灯塔社区的经验教训
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Apr 23;2(1):1057. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1057. eCollection 2014.
3
Creating a connected community: lessons learned from the Western new york beacon community.创建一个互联互通的社区:从纽约西部灯塔社区汲取的经验教训。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Oct 27;2(3):1091. eCollection 2014.
4
Beacon communities' public health initiatives: a case study analysis.灯塔社区的公共卫生倡议:一项案例研究分析
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Oct 24;2(3):1093. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1093. eCollection 2014.
5
Making it local: Beacon Communities use health information technology to optimize care management.实现本土化:灯塔社区利用健康信息技术优化护理管理。
Popul Health Manag. 2014 Jun;17(3):149-58. doi: 10.1089/pop.2013.0084. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
6
The Southeastern Minnesota Beacon Project for Community-driven Health Information Technology: Origins, Achievements, and Legacy.明尼苏达州东南部社区驱动的健康信息技术灯塔项目:起源、成就与遗产。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Oct 28;2(3):1101. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1101. eCollection 2014.
7
Learning from health information exchange technical architecture and implementation in seven beacon communities.从七个灯塔社区的健康信息交换技术架构与实施中学习。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 May 5;2(1):1060. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1060. eCollection 2014.
8
Developing a communitywide electronic health record disease registry in primary care practices: lessons learned from the Western new york beacon community.在基层医疗实践中建立全社区电子健康记录疾病登记系统:来自纽约西部灯塔社区的经验教训。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Sep 4;2(3):1089. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1089. eCollection 2014.
9
An early status report on the Beacon Communities' plans for transformation via health information technology.贝肯社区通过健康信息技术进行转型的早期现状报告。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Apr;30(4):782-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0166.
10
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.

引用本文的文献

1
Transforming Health Data to Actionable Information: Recent Progress and Future Opportunities in Health Information Exchange.将健康数据转化为可操作的信息:健康信息交换的最新进展和未来机遇。
Yearb Med Inform. 2022 Aug;31(1):203-214. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1742519. Epub 2022 Dec 4.
2
Community-based Health Data Cooperatives Towards Improving the Immigrant Community Health: A Scoping Review to Inform Policy and Practice.基于社区的健康数据合作社以改善移民社区健康:一项为政策和实践提供信息的范围综述
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2020 Jun 23;5(1):1158. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v5i1.1158.
3
IT-enabled Community Health Interventions: Challenges, Opportunities, and Future Directions.信息技术支持的社区卫生干预措施:挑战、机遇与未来方向。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Oct 30;2(3):1117. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1117. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
Adoption of electronic health records grows rapidly, but fewer than half of US hospitals had at least a basic system in 2012.电子健康记录的采用迅速增长,但 2012 年时,仍仅有不到一半的美国医院至少拥有一个基本系统。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Aug;32(8):1478-85. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0308. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
2
Meeting meaningful use criteria and managing patient populations: a national survey of practicing physicians.达到有意义使用标准和管理患者群体:对执业医师的全国性调查。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jun 4;158(11):791-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-11-201306040-00003.
3
Health information exchange among US hospitals.美国医院间的健康信息交换。
Am J Manag Care. 2011 Nov;17(11):761-8.
4
A survey of health information exchange organizations in the United States: implications for meaningful use.美国健康信息交换组织调查:对有意义使用的启示。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 May 17;154(10):666-71. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-10-201105170-00006.
5
Achieving a nationwide learning health system.实现全国性的学习型医疗体系。
Sci Transl Med. 2010 Nov 10;2(57):57cm29. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001456.
6
Beacon communities aim to use health information technology to transform the delivery of care.灯塔社区旨在利用健康信息技术来改变医疗服务的提供方式。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Sep;29(9):1671-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0577.
7
Health information exchange: persistent challenges and new strategies.健康信息交换:持续存在的挑战和新策略。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 May-Jun;17(3):288-94. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.003673.