University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, 70000, Vietnam; Online Research Club, http://onlineresearchclub.org.
Online Research Club, http://onlineresearchclub.org; School of Medicine, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, 70000, Vietnam.
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 7;10(4):e0121054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121054. eCollection 2015.
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has developed as the dominant paradigm of assessment of evidence that is used in clinical practice. Since its development, EBM has been applied to integrate the best available research into diagnosis and treatment with the purpose of improving patient care. In the EBM era, a hierarchy of evidence has been proposed, including various types of research methods, such as meta-analysis (MA), systematic review (SRV), randomized controlled trial (RCT), case report (CR), practice guideline (PGL), and so on. Although there are numerous studies examining the impact and importance of specific cases of EBM in clinical practice, there is a lack of research quantitatively measuring publication trends in the growth and development of EBM. Therefore, a bibliometric analysis was constructed to determine the scientific productivity of EBM research over decades.
NCBI PubMed database was used to search, retrieve and classify publications according to research method and year of publication. Joinpoint regression analysis was undertaken to analyze trends in research productivity and the prevalence of individual research methods.
Analysis indicates that MA and SRV, which are classified as the highest ranking of evidence in the EBM, accounted for a relatively small but auspicious number of publications. For most research methods, the annual percent change (APC) indicates a consistent increase in publication frequency. MA, SRV and RCT show the highest rate of publication growth in the past twenty years. Only controlled clinical trials (CCT) shows a non-significant reduction in publications over the past ten years.
Higher quality research methods, such as MA, SRV and RCT, are showing continuous publication growth, which suggests an acknowledgement of the value of these methods. This study provides the first quantitative assessment of research method publication trends in EBM.
循证医学(EBM)已发展成为评估用于临床实践的证据的主导范式。自发展以来,EBM 一直被用于整合最佳可用研究,以改善患者护理。在 EBM 时代,提出了证据等级,包括各种类型的研究方法,例如荟萃分析(MA)、系统评价(SRV)、随机对照试验(RCT)、病例报告(CR)、实践指南(PGL)等。尽管有许多研究检查了 EBM 在临床实践中的具体影响和重要性,但缺乏定量衡量 EBM 增长和发展的研究趋势的研究。因此,构建了文献计量分析以确定 EBM 研究数十年的科学生产力。
使用 NCBI PubMed 数据库根据研究方法和发表年份进行搜索、检索和分类出版物。进行 Joinpoint 回归分析以分析研究生产力趋势和个别研究方法的流行率。
分析表明,MA 和 SRV 被归类为 EBM 中最高等级的证据,其发表的文章数量相对较少,但数量可观。对于大多数研究方法,年百分比变化(APC)表明发表频率持续增加。MA、SRV 和 RCT 显示过去二十年出版增长率最高。只有对照临床试验(CCT)在过去十年中出版物数量呈非显著减少。
更高质量的研究方法,如 MA、SRV 和 RCT,显示出持续的出版增长,这表明人们承认这些方法的价值。本研究首次对 EBM 中研究方法出版趋势进行了定量评估。