Suppr超能文献

监管驱动的绩效标准是否仍然可以接受?——德国的观点。

Are regulation-driven performance criteria still acceptable? - The German point of view.

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015 May;53(6):893-8. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2014-1144.

Abstract

Performance criteria should be a challenge for the laboratories to improve their quality. In countries with mandatory proficiency testing, the definition of performance criteria is a particular issue. If the definition of performance criteria is mandated from the regulatory bodies to medico-scientific institutions, scientific approaches (i.e., based on biological variation), the state-of-the-art approach (i.e., based on technical feasibility) as well as medical needs can be used to set up performance criteria such as the Richtlinie der Bundesärztekammer (RiliBÄK; Guideline of the German Medical Association on Quality Assurance in Medical Laboratory Examinations) in Germany. The experiences with RiliBÄK show that these performance criteria have to be revised on an ongoing basis.

摘要

性能标准应成为实验室提高质量的挑战。在实施强制性能力验证的国家,性能标准的定义是一个特别的问题。如果性能标准的定义是由监管机构强制规定给医学科学机构的,可以采用科学方法(即基于生物学变异)、最新技术方法(即基于技术可行性)以及医疗需求来制定性能标准,如德国的 Richtlinie der Bundesärztekammer (RiliBÄK;德国医师协会关于医学实验室检查质量保证的指南)。德国的 RiliBÄK 经验表明,这些性能标准必须持续修订。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验