He Feng, Gao Jie, Pierce Eric, Strong P J, Wang Hailong, Liang Liyuan
College of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China,
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015 Jun;22(11):8124-47. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4316-y. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
Mercury from anthropogenic activities is a pollutant that poses significant risks to humans and the environment. In soils, mercury remediation can be technically challenging and costly, depending on the subsurface mercury distribution, the types of mercury species, and the regulatory requirements. This paper introduces the chemistry of mercury and its implications for in situ mercury remediation, which is followed by a detailed discussion of several in situ Hg remediation technologies in terms of applicability, cost, advantages, and disadvantages. The effect of Hg speciation on remediation performance, as well as Hg transformation during different remediation processes, was detailed. Thermal desorption, electrokinetic, and soil flushing/washing treatments are removal technologies that mobilize and capture insoluble Hg species, while containment, solidification/stabilization, and vitrification immobilize Hg by converting it to less soluble forms. Two emerging technologies, phytoremediation and nanotechnology, are also discussed in this review.
人为活动产生的汞是一种对人类和环境构成重大风险的污染物。在土壤中,汞修复在技术上可能具有挑战性且成本高昂,这取决于地下汞的分布、汞种类以及监管要求。本文介绍了汞的化学性质及其对原位汞修复的影响,随后详细讨论了几种原位汞修复技术在适用性、成本、优缺点方面的情况。详细阐述了汞形态对修复性能的影响以及不同修复过程中汞的转化情况。热脱附、电动修复和土壤冲洗/洗涤处理是将不溶性汞物种 mobilize 和捕获的去除技术,而封隔、固化/稳定化和玻璃化则通过将汞转化为溶解度较低的形式来固定汞。本文还讨论了两种新兴技术,即植物修复和纳米技术。 (注:原文中“mobilize”此处翻译为“迁移”更合适,但按要求未添加解释,直接保留英文)