Suppr超能文献

引产与剖宫产:真实关系究竟如何?

Induction of Labor and Cesarean: What is the True Relationship?

作者信息

Little Sarah E, Caughey Aaron B

机构信息

*Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts †Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.

出版信息

Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;58(2):269-81. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000112.

Abstract

It is a commonly held belief that labor induction increases the risk of cesarean delivery; women who are induced are at higher risk of cesarean as compared with those in spontaneous labor. This comparison group is inaccurate, however, as women and providers cannot choose spontaneous labor as the alternative to labor induction. With expectant management, spontaneous labor may occur, but as gestation advances, pregnancy complications may occur, or women may progress postterm requiring induction at a later gestation. Using the proper comparison group, studies find that labor induction is actually associated with a small decreased risk of cesarean delivery.

摘要

人们普遍认为引产会增加剖宫产的风险;与自然分娩的女性相比,接受引产的女性剖宫产风险更高。然而,这种比较组并不准确,因为女性和医护人员无法选择自然分娩来替代引产。采用期待管理时,可能会出现自然分娩,但随着孕周增加,可能会出现妊娠并发症,或者女性可能会过期妊娠,需要在更晚的孕周进行引产。使用恰当的比较组后,研究发现引产实际上与剖宫产风险略有降低有关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验