Panouillères Muriel T N, Miall R Chris, Jenkinson Ned
Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom,
Behavioural Brain Sciences Centre, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom, and.
J Neurosci. 2015 Apr 8;35(14):5471-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4064-14.2015.
The posterior vermis of the cerebellum is considered to be critically involved in saccadic adaptation. However, recent evidence suggests that the adaptive decrease (backward adaptation) and the adaptive increase (forward adaptation) of saccade amplitude rely on partially separate neural substrates. We investigated whether the posterior cerebellum could be differentially involved in backward and forward adaptation by using transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS). To do so, participants' saccades were adapted backward or forward while they received anodal, cathodal, or sham TDCS. In two extra groups, subjects underwent a nonadaptation session while receiving anodal or cathodal TDCS to control for the direct effects of TDCS on saccadic execution. Surprisingly, cathodal stimulation tended to increase the extent of both forward and backward adaptations, while anodal TDCS strongly impaired forward adaptation and, to a smaller extent, backward adaptation. Forward adaptation was accompanied by a greater increase in velocity with cathodal stimulation, and reduced duration of change for anodal stimulation. In contrast, the expected velocity decrease in backward adaptation was noticeably weaker with anodal stimulation. Stimulation applied during nonadaptation sessions did not affect saccadic gain, velocity, or duration, demonstrating that the reported effects are not due to direct effects of the stimulation on the generation of eye movements. Our results demonstrate that cerebellar excitability is critical for saccadic adaptation. Based on our results and the growing evidence from studies of vestibulo-ocular reflex and saccadic adaptation, we conclude that the plasticity at the level of the oculomotor vermis is more fundamentally important for forward adaptation than for backward adaptation.
小脑蚓部后叶被认为在扫视适应中起关键作用。然而,最近有证据表明,扫视幅度的适应性降低(反向适应)和适应性增加(正向适应)依赖于部分分离的神经基质。我们通过经颅直流电刺激(TDCS)研究了小脑后部是否在反向和正向适应中发挥不同作用。为此,在参与者接受阳极、阴极或假TDCS时,使其扫视进行反向或正向适应。在另外两组中,受试者在接受阳极或阴极TDCS时进行非适应实验,以控制TDCS对扫视执行的直接影响。令人惊讶的是,阴极刺激往往会增加正向和反向适应的程度,而阳极TDCS则严重损害正向适应,并在较小程度上损害反向适应。阴极刺激时,正向适应伴随着速度的更大增加,而阳极刺激时,变化持续时间缩短。相比之下,阳极刺激时,反向适应中预期的速度降低明显较弱。在非适应实验期间施加的刺激不影响扫视增益、速度或持续时间,这表明所报告的效应不是由于刺激对眼球运动产生的直接影响。我们的结果表明,小脑兴奋性对扫视适应至关重要。基于我们的结果以及来自前庭眼反射和扫视适应研究的越来越多的证据,我们得出结论,动眼蚓部水平的可塑性对正向适应比反向适应更为重要。