• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The heterogeneous effects of cigarette prices on brand choice in China: implications for tobacco control policy.香烟价格对中国品牌选择的异质性影响:对烟草控制政策的启示
Tob Control. 2015 Jul;24 Suppl 3(0 3):iii25-iii32. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051887. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
2
The effect of cigarette prices on brand-switching in China: a longitudinal analysis of data from the ITC China Survey.香烟价格对中国品牌转换的影响:基于国际烟草控制中国调查数据的纵向分析
Tob Control. 2014 Mar;23 Suppl 1(0 1):i54-60. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050922. Epub 2013 May 22.
3
Chinese smokers' cigarette purchase behaviours, cigarette prices and consumption: findings from the ITC China Survey.中国吸烟者的卷烟购买行为、卷烟价格与消费:国际烟草控制政策评估项目中国调查结果
Tob Control. 2014 Mar;23 Suppl 1(0 1):i67-72. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051057. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
4
Tax, price and cigarette brand preferences: a longitudinal study of adult smokers from the ITC Mexico Survey.税收、价格与香烟品牌偏好:来自国际烟草控制墨西哥调查的成年吸烟者纵向研究
Tob Control. 2014 Mar;23 Suppl 1(0 1):i80-5. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050939. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
5
Differential responsiveness to cigarette price by education and income among adult urban Chinese smokers: findings from the ITC China Survey.中国城市成年吸烟者中按教育程度和收入划分的香烟价格差异反应:国际烟草控制中国调查结果
Tob Control. 2015 Jul;24 Suppl 3(0 3):iii76-iii82. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052091. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
6
Are lower income smokers more price sensitive?: the evidence from Korean cigarette tax increases.低收入吸烟者对价格更敏感吗?:来自韩国香烟税上调的证据。
Tob Control. 2016 Mar;25(2):141-6. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051680. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
7
Changes in cigarette prices, affordability, and brand-tier consumption after a tobacco tax increase in Thailand: Evidence from the Global Adult Tobacco Surveys, 2009 and 2011.泰国提高烟草税后香烟价格、可负担性和品牌层级消费的变化:来自 2009 年和 2011 年全球成人烟草调查的证据。
Prev Med. 2017 Dec;105S:S4-S9. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.05.027. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
8
The use of legal, illegal and roll-your-own cigarettes to increasing tobacco excise taxes and comprehensive tobacco control policies: findings from the ITC Uruguay Survey.使用合法、非法和自卷烟来提高烟草消费税及实施全面烟草控制政策:国际烟草控制乌拉圭调查的结果
Tob Control. 2015 Jul;24 Suppl 3(0 3):iii17-iii24. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051890. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
9
Cigarette excise tax structure and cigarette prices: evidence from the global adult tobacco survey and the U.S. National Adult Tobacco Survey.卷烟消费税结构和卷烟价格:来自全球成人烟草调查和美国全国成人烟草调查的证据。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Jan;16 Suppl 1:S3-9. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt121. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
10
Brand-switching and tobacco taxation in Vietnam.越南的品牌转换和烟草税收。
Tob Control. 2022 Sep;31(Suppl 2):s88-s94. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056821. Epub 2021 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Consumption of JUUL vs. Other E-Cigarette Brands among U.S. E-Cigarette Users: Evidence from Wave 5 of the PATH Study.美国电子烟使用者中 JUUL 与其他电子烟品牌的消费比较:来自 PATH 研究第 5 波的数据证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 31;19(17):10837. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710837.
2
Public Reactions to the Cigarette Control Regulation on a Chinese Microblogging Platform: Empirical Analysis.中国微博平台上公众对香烟控制规定的反应:实证分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 27;22(4):e14660. doi: 10.2196/14660.
3
Taking Stock of Tobacco Control Program and Policy Science and Impact in the United States.评估美国的烟草控制项目、政策科学及影响。
J Addict Behav Ther. 2017;1(2). Epub 2017 Sep 15.
4
Socio-Economic Inequalities in Tobacco Consumption of the Older Adults in China: A Decomposition Method.社会经济不平等对中国老年人烟草消费的影响:一种分解方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jul 11;15(7):1466. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071466.
5
Distributional benefits of tobacco tax and smoke-free workplaces in China: A modeling study.中国烟草税与无烟工作场所的分配效益:一项建模研究。
J Glob Health. 2017 Dec;7(2):020701. doi: 10.7189/jogh.07.020701.

本文引用的文献

1
WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in China: barriers, challenges and recommendations.世界卫生组织《烟草控制框架公约》在中国:障碍、挑战和建议。
Glob Health Promot. 2013 Dec;20(4):13-22. doi: 10.1177/1757975913501910. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
2
The effect of cigarette prices on brand-switching in China: a longitudinal analysis of data from the ITC China Survey.香烟价格对中国品牌转换的影响:基于国际烟草控制中国调查数据的纵向分析
Tob Control. 2014 Mar;23 Suppl 1(0 1):i54-60. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050922. Epub 2013 May 22.
3
Can increases in the cigarette tax rate be linked to cigarette retail prices? Solving mysteries related to the cigarette pricing mechanism in China.提高香烟税率与香烟零售价格有关吗?解开中国香烟定价机制之谜。
Tob Control. 2012 Nov;21(6):560-2. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050027. Epub 2011 Oct 7.
4
Recent tobacco tax rate adjustment and its potential impact on tobacco control in China.最近的烟草税率调整及其对中国控烟的潜在影响。
Tob Control. 2010 Feb;19(1):80-2. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.032631. Epub 2009 Oct 21.

香烟价格对中国品牌选择的异质性影响:对烟草控制政策的启示

The heterogeneous effects of cigarette prices on brand choice in China: implications for tobacco control policy.

作者信息

Li Jing, White Justin S, Hu Teh-Wei, Fong Geoffrey T, Yuan Jiang

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.

Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.

出版信息

Tob Control. 2015 Jul;24 Suppl 3(0 3):iii25-iii32. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051887. Epub 2015 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051887
PMID:25855642
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4480158/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

China has long kept its tobacco taxes below international standards. The Chinese government has cited two rationales against raising tobacco tax, namely, the unfair burden it places on low-income smokers and the ability of consumers to switch to cheaper brands.

OBJECTIVE

This study examines how different socioeconomic subgroups of Chinese smokers switch brands in response to cigarette price changes.

METHODS

We model smokers' choice of cigarette tier as a function of tier-specific prices. We examine heterogeneous responses to prices by estimating mixed logit models for different income and education subgroups that allow for random variation in smokers' preferences. We use data from three waves of the longitudinal International Tobacco Control China Survey, collected in six large Chinese cities between 2006 and 2009.

FINDINGS

Low-income and less educated smokers are considerably more likely to switch tiers (including both up-trading and down-trading) than are their high-socioeconomic status (SES) counterparts. For those in the second-to-lowest tier, a ¥1 ($0.16, or roughly 25%) rise in prices increases the likelihood of switching tiers by 5.6% points for low-income smokers and 7.2% points for less educated smokers, compared to 1.6% and 3.0% points for the corresponding high-SES groups. Low-income and less educated groups are also more likely to trade down compared to their high-SES counterparts.

CONCLUSIONS

Only a small percentage of low-income and less educated Chinese smokers switched to cheaper brands in response to price increases. Hence, the concern of the Chinese government that a cigarette tax increase will lead to large-scale brand switching is not supported by this study.

摘要

背景

长期以来,中国的烟草税一直低于国际标准。中国政府提出了两个反对提高烟草税的理由,即增加烟草税会给低收入吸烟者带来不公平负担,以及消费者有能力转向价格更低的品牌。

目的

本研究考察了中国吸烟者的不同社会经济亚组如何因香烟价格变化而更换品牌。

方法

我们将吸烟者对香烟档次的选择建模为特定档次价格的函数。我们通过估计不同收入和教育亚组的混合logit模型来检验对价格的异质反应,该模型允许吸烟者的偏好存在随机变化。我们使用了2006年至2009年期间在中国六个大城市收集的三波纵向国际烟草控制中国调查的数据。

结果

与社会经济地位较高的吸烟者相比,低收入和受教育程度较低的吸烟者更换档次(包括升级和降级)的可能性要大得多。对于处于倒数第二档次的吸烟者,价格每上涨1元(0.16美元,约合25%),低收入吸烟者更换档次的可能性增加5.6个百分点,受教育程度较低的吸烟者增加7.2个百分点,而相应社会经济地位较高的群体分别增加1.6个和3.0个百分点。与社会经济地位较高的吸烟者相比,低收入和受教育程度较低的群体也更有可能选择降级。

结论

只有一小部分低收入和受教育程度较低的中国吸烟者因价格上涨而转向价格更低的品牌。因此,本研究不支持中国政府关于提高卷烟税会导致大规模品牌转换的担忧。