Li Jing, White Justin S, Hu Teh-Wei, Fong Geoffrey T, Yuan Jiang
School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Tob Control. 2015 Jul;24 Suppl 3(0 3):iii25-iii32. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051887. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
China has long kept its tobacco taxes below international standards. The Chinese government has cited two rationales against raising tobacco tax, namely, the unfair burden it places on low-income smokers and the ability of consumers to switch to cheaper brands.
This study examines how different socioeconomic subgroups of Chinese smokers switch brands in response to cigarette price changes.
We model smokers' choice of cigarette tier as a function of tier-specific prices. We examine heterogeneous responses to prices by estimating mixed logit models for different income and education subgroups that allow for random variation in smokers' preferences. We use data from three waves of the longitudinal International Tobacco Control China Survey, collected in six large Chinese cities between 2006 and 2009.
Low-income and less educated smokers are considerably more likely to switch tiers (including both up-trading and down-trading) than are their high-socioeconomic status (SES) counterparts. For those in the second-to-lowest tier, a ¥1 ($0.16, or roughly 25%) rise in prices increases the likelihood of switching tiers by 5.6% points for low-income smokers and 7.2% points for less educated smokers, compared to 1.6% and 3.0% points for the corresponding high-SES groups. Low-income and less educated groups are also more likely to trade down compared to their high-SES counterparts.
Only a small percentage of low-income and less educated Chinese smokers switched to cheaper brands in response to price increases. Hence, the concern of the Chinese government that a cigarette tax increase will lead to large-scale brand switching is not supported by this study.
长期以来,中国的烟草税一直低于国际标准。中国政府提出了两个反对提高烟草税的理由,即增加烟草税会给低收入吸烟者带来不公平负担,以及消费者有能力转向价格更低的品牌。
本研究考察了中国吸烟者的不同社会经济亚组如何因香烟价格变化而更换品牌。
我们将吸烟者对香烟档次的选择建模为特定档次价格的函数。我们通过估计不同收入和教育亚组的混合logit模型来检验对价格的异质反应,该模型允许吸烟者的偏好存在随机变化。我们使用了2006年至2009年期间在中国六个大城市收集的三波纵向国际烟草控制中国调查的数据。
与社会经济地位较高的吸烟者相比,低收入和受教育程度较低的吸烟者更换档次(包括升级和降级)的可能性要大得多。对于处于倒数第二档次的吸烟者,价格每上涨1元(0.16美元,约合25%),低收入吸烟者更换档次的可能性增加5.6个百分点,受教育程度较低的吸烟者增加7.2个百分点,而相应社会经济地位较高的群体分别增加1.6个和3.0个百分点。与社会经济地位较高的吸烟者相比,低收入和受教育程度较低的群体也更有可能选择降级。
只有一小部分低收入和受教育程度较低的中国吸烟者因价格上涨而转向价格更低的品牌。因此,本研究不支持中国政府关于提高卷烟税会导致大规模品牌转换的担忧。