Department of Economics, University of Illinois at Chicago, IL;
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Jan;16 Suppl 1:S3-9. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt121. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
The importance of tobacco tax structure in determining the relative prices of different tobacco products and brands has become increasingly recognized. The structuring of tobacco tax across products and brands within a country can impact the variability of prices within a country, shaping consumption and influencing tobacco users' incentives to switch down to cheaper alternatives in response to tax and price increases.
Brand-specific data on the average prices paid for the top 5 cigarette brands in 13 countries were obtained from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey, and for the United States, data were obtained from the National Adult Tobacco Survey. The variability of cigarette prices paid across brands was analyzed in the context of each country's tobacco tax structure.
Countries with simpler cigarette tax structures, particularly those that emphasize specific taxes and do not involve tier-based taxes, exhibit less variability in the prices smokers pay for cigarettes across brands.
Increases in cigarette taxes in countries with simpler tax structures will be more effective in reducing cigarette smoking and its health and economic consequences than comparable tax increases in countries where tax structures are more complicated and there are greater opportunities for switching to cheaper brands in order to avoid a tax increase.
烟草税结构在确定不同烟草产品和品牌相对价格方面的重要性日益受到重视。在一个国家内对产品和品牌进行烟草税结构调整,可能会影响国内价格的可变性,从而影响消费,并促使烟草使用者为了应对税收和价格上涨而转向更便宜的替代品。
从全球成人烟草调查中获取了 13 个国家排名前 5 的香烟品牌的平均价格的品牌特定数据,对于美国,数据则从全国成人烟草调查中获取。在每个国家的烟草税结构背景下,分析了不同品牌香烟支付价格的可变性。
烟草税结构较为简单的国家,特别是那些强调特定税收而不涉及分层税收的国家,香烟品牌之间吸烟者支付价格的可变性较小。
在烟草税结构较为简单的国家,提高香烟税将比在税收结构较为复杂且有更多机会转向更便宜品牌以避免税收增加的国家,更有效地减少吸烟及其对健康和经济的影响。