Day Lisa C, Muise Amy, Joel Samantha, Impett Emily A
University of Toronto Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
University of Toronto Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Jun;41(6):791-804. doi: 10.1177/0146167215580129. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
The current research investigates how people make sexual decisions when romantic partners' sexual desires conflict, situations we refer to as sexual interdependence dilemmas. Across an experimental study, a retrospective recall study, and a 21-day daily experience study, we found that people who were motivated to meet their partner's sexual needs--those high in sexual communal strength--were more willing to engage in sex with their romantic partner, even when their own desire was low, and as a result, both partners reported enhanced relationship and sexual satisfaction. The benefits of sexual communal strength were due to communally oriented people's increased desire to promote their partner's interests and decreased desire to pursue their own interests. This is the first set of studies to investigate how people make decisions in sexual interdependence dilemmas and show that communally motivated individuals navigate these situations in a way that is beneficial for relationships.
当前的研究探讨了在浪漫伴侣的性欲望发生冲突时,即我们所说的性相互依赖困境中,人们是如何做出性决策的。通过一项实验研究、一项回顾性回忆研究和一项为期21天的日常体验研究,我们发现那些有动力满足伴侣性需求的人——即性共同体力量高的人——更愿意与他们的浪漫伴侣发生性行为,即使他们自己的欲望很低,结果,双方都报告说关系和性满意度得到了提高。性共同体力量的好处源于具有共同体导向的人增强了促进伴侣利益的欲望,以及减少了追求自身利益的欲望。这是第一组研究人们在性相互依赖困境中如何做出决策的研究,并表明具有共同体动机的个体以一种有利于关系的方式应对这些情况。