Suppr超能文献

军事相关创伤性脑损伤后人格评估量表的剖析

Profile analyses of the Personality Assessment Inventory following military-related traumatic brain injury.

作者信息

Kennedy Jan E, Cooper Douglas B, Reid Matthew W, Tate David F, Lange Rael T

机构信息

Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center, San Antonio Military Medical Center, Ft Sam Houston, TX, USA

Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center, San Antonio Military Medical Center, Ft Sam Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2015 May;30(3):236-47. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acv014. Epub 2015 Apr 8.

Abstract

Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) profiles were examined in 160 U.S. service members (SMs) following mild-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Participants who sustained a mild TBI had significantly higher PAI scores than those with moderate-severe TBI on eight of the nine clinical scales examined. A two-step cluster analysis identified four PAI profiles, heuristically labeled "High Distress", "Moderate Distress", "Somatic Distress," and "No Distress". Postconcussive and posttraumatic stress symptom severity was highest for the High Distress group, followed by the Somatic and Moderate Distress groups, and the No Distress group. Profile groups differed in age, ethnicity, rank, and TBI severity. Findings indicate that meaningful patterns of behavioral and personality characteristics can be detected in active duty military SMs following TBI, which may prove useful in selecting the most efficacious rehabilitation strategies.

摘要

对160名美国现役军人在轻度至重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后进行了人格评估量表(PAI)剖析。在九个临床量表中的八个量表上,遭受轻度TBI的参与者的PAI得分显著高于中度至重度TBI的参与者。两步聚类分析确定了四种PAI剖析类型,试探性地标记为“高度痛苦”“中度痛苦”“躯体痛苦”和“无痛苦”。高度痛苦组的脑震荡后和创伤后应激症状严重程度最高,其次是躯体痛苦组和中度痛苦组,无痛苦组最低。剖析类型组在年龄、种族、军衔和TBI严重程度方面存在差异。研究结果表明,在现役军人TBI后可以检测到有意义的行为和人格特征模式,这可能有助于选择最有效的康复策略。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Psychotherapy of mood disorders.情绪障碍的心理治疗
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2014 Nov 26;10:140-58. doi: 10.2174/1745017901410010140. eCollection 2014.
3
Pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders in adults.成人躯体形式障碍的药物干预
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 7;2014(11):CD010628. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010628.pub2.
4
Assessing effort: differentiating performance and symptom validity.评估努力程度:区分表现和症状真实性。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2013;27(8):1234-46. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2013.835447. Epub 2013 Sep 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验