• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高老年人参与临床试验的招募率:使用队列多次随机对照试验设计。

Improving recruitment of older people to clinical trials: use of the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design.

机构信息

Academic Unit of Elderly Care & Rehabilitation, University of Leeds, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Temple Bank House, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK.

School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Age Ageing. 2015 Jul;44(4):547-50. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv044. Epub 2015 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1093/ageing/afv044
PMID:25857552
Abstract

There is widespread evidence of under-recruitment of older people to research studies, notably randomised controlled trials of interventions. Study exclusion criteria, ethical dilemmas, patient preference, risk of bias and challenges for treatment comparisons are particular problems faced by researchers. This article describes how more widespread use of the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial (cmRCT) design in ageing research may help address many of these problems. The original key features of the cmRCT design are a large observational cohort of people with the condition of interest (e.g. frailty) with regular measurement of outcomes for the whole cohort. For each RCT eligible patients are identified and a random selection offered the trial intervention; their outcomes are compared with those eligible patients not offered the intervention. Relevant assents are obtained at baseline to enable future involvement in a range of potential trials. Where possible, the follow-up schedule is aligned with the key time points for assessment in future trials and includes the key baseline descriptors, and primary and secondary outcomes. The cmRCT approach also enables detailed observational and qualitative research for the chosen condition of interest, and might include the establishment of research biobanks to better align basic science, epidemiological, qualitative and clinical trial research.

摘要

有广泛的证据表明,老年人在研究中的参与率较低,特别是在干预措施的随机对照试验中。研究排除标准、伦理困境、患者偏好、偏倚风险以及治疗比较的挑战是研究人员面临的特殊问题。本文描述了在老年研究中更广泛地使用队列多随机对照试验(cmRCT)设计如何有助于解决许多这些问题。cmRCT 设计的最初主要特点是对感兴趣的疾病(如虚弱)的大量观察性队列人群进行定期测量,对整个队列进行评估。对于每个 RCT,确定符合条件的患者,并为他们提供随机选择的试验干预措施;将他们的结果与未接受干预的符合条件的患者进行比较。在基线时获得相关同意,以使其能够在未来参与一系列潜在试验。在可能的情况下,随访计划与未来试验的关键评估时间点对齐,并包括关键的基线描述符、主要和次要结局。cmRCT 方法还可以为选定的感兴趣疾病进行详细的观察性和定性研究,并且可能包括建立研究生物库,以更好地将基础科学、流行病学、定性和临床试验研究联系起来。

相似文献

1
Improving recruitment of older people to clinical trials: use of the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design.提高老年人参与临床试验的招募率:使用队列多次随机对照试验设计。
Age Ageing. 2015 Jul;44(4):547-50. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv044. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
2
The DiReCT study - improving recruitment into clinical trials: a mixed methods study investigating the ethical acceptability, feasibility and recruitment yield of the cohort multiple randomised controlled trials design.DiReCT研究——改善临床试验的招募情况:一项混合方法研究,调查队列多重随机对照试验设计的伦理可接受性、可行性和招募效果。
Trials. 2014 Oct 16;15:398. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-398.
3
Benefits and challenges of using the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design for testing an intervention for depression.使用队列多重随机对照试验设计来测试抑郁症干预措施的益处与挑战。
Trials. 2017 Jul 6;18(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2059-4.
4
[Cohort multiple randomized controlled trial: a solution for the evaluation of multiple interventions].队列多重随机对照试验:一种评估多种干预措施的解决方案
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2013;157(17):A5762.
5
The Utrecht cohort for Multiple BREast cancer intervention studies and Long-term evaLuAtion (UMBRELLA): objectives, design, and baseline results.乌得勒支队列用于多乳房癌干预研究和长期评估(UMBRELLA):目标、设计和基线结果。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jul;164(2):445-450. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4242-4. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
6
Ethical pitfalls in neonatal comparative effectiveness trials.新生儿比较疗效试验中的伦理陷阱。
Neonatology. 2014;105(4):350-1. doi: 10.1159/000360650. Epub 2014 May 30.
7
Evaluation of biases present in the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design: a simulation study.队列多重随机对照试验设计中存在的偏倚评估:一项模拟研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Jan 31;17(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0295-7.
8
Brief Report: Staged-informed Consent in the Cohort Multiple Randomized Controlled Trial Design.简要报告:队列多随机对照试验设计中的分期知情同意。
Epidemiology. 2016 May;27(3):389-92. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000435.
9
The challenges of clinical trials in the exclusion zone: the case of the frail elderly.禁区内临床试验的挑战:以体弱老年人为例。
Australas J Ageing. 2008 Jun;27(2):61-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2008.00288.x.
10
Keeping it credible in cohort multiple Randomised Controlled Trials: the Community Ageing Research 75+ (CARE 75+) study model of patient and public involvement and engagement.在队列多重随机对照试验中保持其可信度:社区老年研究75岁及以上(CARE 75+)患者和公众参与及介入的研究模式
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Aug 30;2:30. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0044-9. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Underrepresentation of older patients in clinical trials in nephrology.老年患者在肾脏病临床试验中的代表性不足。
Clin Kidney J. 2025 May 7;18(5):sfaf143. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaf143. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Predictors of independence in older people: A longitudinal, population-based study using the CARE75 + cohort.老年人独立性的预测因素:一项基于人群的纵向研究,使用CARE75+队列。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Apr 28;25(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05927-4.
3
How can we improve Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment for older people living with frailty in primary care and community settings? A qualitative study.
如何在初级保健和社区环境中改善衰弱老年人的综合老年评估?一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 28;14(3):e081304. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081304.
4
Randomised trials conducted using cohorts: a scoping review.使用队列进行的随机试验:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 8;14(3):e075601. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075601.
5
A Systematic Review of the Statistical Methods Adopted for Analyzing Follow-Up Data in Cohort Multiple Randomized Controlled Trial.队列多重随机对照试验中分析随访数据所采用统计方法的系统评价
Cureus. 2024 Jan 3;16(1):e51558. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51558. eCollection 2024 Jan.
6
Engagement in research during specialist geriatric medicine training: results of a national trainee survey.参与老年医学专科培训期间的研究:全国学员调查结果。
Clin Med (Lond). 2022 Nov;22(6):553-558. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2022-0283.
7
Community Ageing Research 75+ (CARE75+) REMOTE study: a remote model of recruitment and assessment of the health, well-being and social circumstances of older people.社区老龄化研究 75+(CARE75+)远程研究:一种远程招募和评估老年人健康、福祉和社会环境的模式。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 22;11(11):e048524. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048524.
8
Process Evaluation of the SImplification of Medications Prescribed to Long-tErm Care Residents (SIMPLER) Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial: A Mixed Methods Study.长期护理居民简化用药(SIMPLER)整群随机对照试验的过程评估:一项混合方法研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 27;18(11):5778. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115778.
9
The Value of Routinely Collected Data in Evaluating Home Assessment and Modification Interventions to Prevent Falls in Older People: Systematic Literature Review.常规收集的数据在评估家庭评估与改造干预措施以预防老年人跌倒中的价值:系统文献综述
JMIR Aging. 2021 Apr 23;4(2):e24728. doi: 10.2196/24728.
10
Current Challenges Faced by Cancer Clinical Trials in Addressing the Problem of Under-Representation of Older Adults: A Narrative Review.癌症临床试验在解决老年成年人代表性不足问题上面临的当前挑战:一项叙述性综述。
Oncol Ther. 2021 Jun;9(1):55-67. doi: 10.1007/s40487-021-00140-w. Epub 2021 Jan 22.