Mosqueiro Bruno Paz, da Rocha Neusa Sica, Fleck Marcelo Pio de Almeida
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
J Affect Disord. 2015 Jul 1;179:128-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.03.022. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
Religiosity is inversely related to depression and is directly associated with positive psychological outcomes. Nonetheless, there is no consensus on whether or how religiosity could impact and protect against depression. The present study evaluated the association between intrinsic religiosity and resilient psychological characteristics in depressed inpatients.
A sample of 143 depressed patients was prospectively evaluated in an inpatient psychiatric treatment in South Brazil. High Intrinsic Religiosity (HIR) and Low Intrinsic Religiosity (LIR) patients were compared across socio-demographic information, clinical measures, religiosity, resilience and quality of life. A linear regression model was used to evaluate the association between intrinsic religiosity and resilience, and the Cohen d test was utilized to assess effect sizes.
At admission, HIR patients showed higher HAM-D (p=0.05), BPRS (p=0.02), GAF (p=0.02), and CGI (p=0.03) scores, lower educational levels (p=0.04), higher social support (p=0.05), and fewer previous suicide attempts (p=0.05). At discharge, HIR patients showed higher quality of life (p=0.001) and higher resilience (p=0.000), with a large effect size difference between groups (1.02). Based on a linear regression model (adjusted r=0.19, p=0.000), intrinsic religiosity was associated with resilience, controlling for covariates.
In a sample of depressed inpatients, intrinsic religiosity was found to be associated with resilience, quality of life, and fewer previous suicide attempts. These findings support the relevance of religiosity assessments in mental health practice and support the hypothesis that resilient psychological characteristics may mediate the positive effects of intrinsic religiosity in depression.
宗教虔诚度与抑郁症呈负相关,且与积极的心理结果直接相关。然而,对于宗教虔诚度是否以及如何影响和预防抑郁症,目前尚无共识。本研究评估了住院抑郁症患者的内在宗教虔诚度与心理弹性特征之间的关联。
对巴西南部一家住院精神科治疗机构的143名抑郁症患者进行前瞻性评估。比较了高内在宗教虔诚度(HIR)和低内在宗教虔诚度(LIR)患者在社会人口学信息、临床指标、宗教虔诚度、心理弹性和生活质量方面的差异。采用线性回归模型评估内在宗教虔诚度与心理弹性之间的关联,并使用Cohen d检验评估效应大小。
入院时,HIR患者的汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)得分更高(p = 0.05)、简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)得分更高(p = 0.02)、大体功能评定量表(GAF)得分更高(p = 0.02)和临床总体印象量表(CGI)得分更高(p = 0.03),教育水平更低(p = 0.04),社会支持更高(p = 0.05),既往自杀未遂次数更少(p = 0.05)。出院时,HIR患者的生活质量更高(p = 0.001),心理弹性更高(p = 0.000),两组之间的效应大小差异较大(1.02)。基于线性回归模型(调整后r = 0.19,p = 0.000),在控制协变量的情况下,内在宗教虔诚度与心理弹性相关。
在住院抑郁症患者样本中,发现内在宗教虔诚度与心理弹性、生活质量以及既往自杀未遂次数较少相关。这些发现支持了宗教虔诚度评估在心理健康实践中的相关性,并支持心理弹性特征可能介导内在宗教虔诚度对抑郁症的积极影响这一假设。