• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解析婴儿早期模仿行为的重新激活

Deconstructing the reactivation of imitation in young infants.

作者信息

Learmonth Amy E, Cuevas Kimberly, Rovee-Collier Carolyn

机构信息

Department of Psychology, William Paterson University, Wayne, NJ.

出版信息

Dev Psychobiol. 2015 May;57(4):497-505. doi: 10.1002/dev.21298. Epub 2015 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1002/dev.21298
PMID:25864489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4411198/
Abstract

Reactivation is an automatic, perceptual process in which exposure to components of a forgotten event alleviates forgetting. Most research on infant memory reactivation has used conditioning paradigms. We used the puppet imitation task to systematically examine which stimuli could retrieve 6-month-olds' forgotten memory of the modeled actions. Infants watched an adult model a sequence of actions on a puppet, imitated the actions, and were exposed to reactivation cues 24 hr before a 7-day (Experiment 1) or 14-day (Experiment 2) retention test. Exposure to any component of the original event reactivated the memory during the 7-day test, but two of the same components failed to alleviate forgetting during the 14-day test. Increasing the number of retrieval cues facilitated 14-day test performance. These findings reveal that the principles of reactivation are the same for conditioning and imitation paradigms: The necessary and sufficient conditions for memory reactivation are directly related to memory accessibility.

摘要

再激活是一种自动的感知过程,在这个过程中,接触被遗忘事件的组成部分会减轻遗忘。大多数关于婴儿记忆再激活的研究都使用了条件作用范式。我们使用木偶模仿任务来系统地研究哪些刺激可以唤起6个月大婴儿对示范动作的遗忘记忆。婴儿观看成人对木偶进行一系列动作示范,模仿这些动作,并在7天(实验1)或14天(实验2)的记忆测试前24小时接触再激活线索。在7天的测试中,接触原始事件的任何组成部分都会重新激活记忆,但在14天的测试中,相同的两个组成部分未能减轻遗忘。增加检索线索的数量有助于提高14天测试的表现。这些发现表明,再激活的原理在条件作用和模仿范式中是相同的:记忆再激活的必要和充分条件与记忆的可及性直接相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f58a/4411198/bc25dbc5f769/nihms662467f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f58a/4411198/4417f5331253/nihms662467f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f58a/4411198/bc25dbc5f769/nihms662467f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f58a/4411198/4417f5331253/nihms662467f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f58a/4411198/bc25dbc5f769/nihms662467f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Deconstructing the reactivation of imitation in young infants.解析婴儿早期模仿行为的重新激活
Dev Psychobiol. 2015 May;57(4):497-505. doi: 10.1002/dev.21298. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
2
State-Dependent Memory in Infants.婴儿的状态依赖记忆
Child Dev. 2021 Mar;92(2):578-585. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13444. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
3
Mediated imitation in 6-month-olds: remembering by association.6个月大婴儿的模仿介导:通过联想进行记忆。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2001 Jul;79(3):229-52. doi: 10.1006/jecp.2000.2607.
4
The role of object functions for deferred imitation--do infants selectively retain and forget target actions?客体功能在延迟模仿中的作用——婴儿是否会选择性地保留和忘记目标动作?
Infant Behav Dev. 2012 Apr;35(2):195-204. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2012.01.004. Epub 2012 Feb 8.
5
Fourteen-month-olds' imitation is influenced more strongly by a model's competence than by a model's certainty.14 个月大的婴儿的模仿更多地受到模型能力的影响,而不是模型的确定性。
Infant Behav Dev. 2020 Aug;60:101458. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2020.101458. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
6
Relations between 18-month-olds' gaze pattern and target action performance: a deferred imitation study with eye tracking.18 个月大婴儿的注视模式与目标动作表现之间的关系:一项具有眼动追踪的延迟模仿研究。
Infant Behav Dev. 2013 Dec;36(4):736-48. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.08.005. Epub 2013 Sep 1.
7
Infants' use of contextual cues in the generalization of effective actions from imitation.婴儿在模仿中对有效动作的泛化使用语境线索。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Oct;116(2):510-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.09.013. Epub 2013 Jan 26.
8
The effect of prior practice on memory reactivation and generalization.先前练习对记忆再激活和泛化的影响。
Child Dev. 2003 Nov-Dec;74(6):1615-27. doi: 10.1046/j.1467-8624.2003.00627.x.
9
Infants show stability of goal-directed imitation.婴儿表现出目标导向模仿的稳定性。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Jan;114(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.09.005. Epub 2012 Oct 13.
10
Deferred imitation by 6- and 9-month-old infants: more evidence for declarative memory.6个月和9个月大婴儿的延迟模仿:支持陈述性记忆的更多证据。
Dev Psychobiol. 1999 Sep;35(2):83-90. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2302(199909)35:2<83::aid-dev1>3.0.co;2-s.

本文引用的文献

1
Latent Learning and Deferred Imitation at 3 Months.3个月大时的潜在学习与延迟模仿
Infancy. 2005 May;7(3):243-262. doi: 10.1207/s15327078in0703_2. Epub 2005 May 1.
2
Retrieval Protracts Deferred Imitation by 6-Month-Olds.检索延长了6个月大婴儿的延迟模仿。
Infancy. 2005 May;7(3):263-283. doi: 10.1207/s15327078in0703_3. Epub 2005 May 1.
3
Infantile amnesia: forgotten but not gone.婴儿期遗忘:遗忘但并未消失。
Learn Mem. 2014 Feb 14;21(3):135-9. doi: 10.1101/lm.031096.113.
4
Why a neuromaturational model of memory fails: exuberant learning in early infancy.为何记忆的神经成熟模型并不成立:婴儿早期的过度学习
Behav Processes. 2010 Feb;83(2):197-206. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.11.013. Epub 2009 Nov 27.
5
The specificity of priming effects over the first year of life.生命第一年启动效应的特异性。
Dev Psychobiol. 2008 Jul;50(5):486-501. doi: 10.1002/dev.20313.
6
Age-related changes in deferred imitation from television by 6- to 18-month-olds.6至18个月大婴儿对电视延迟模仿的年龄相关变化。
Dev Sci. 2007 Nov;10(6):910-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00641.x.
7
Infants form associations between memory representations of stimuli that are absent.
Psychol Sci. 2006 Jun;17(6):543-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01741.x.
8
Repeated priming increases memory accessibility in infants.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2006 Apr;93(4):357-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.10.002. Epub 2005 Dec 6.
9
The social context of imitation in infancy.婴儿期模仿行为的社会背景。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2005 Aug;91(4):297-314. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.02.001. Epub 2005 Mar 21.
10
Effects of priming duration on retention over the first 1 1/2 years of life.启动持续时间对生命最初1.5年记忆保持的影响。
Dev Psychobiol. 2005 Jul;47(1):43-54. doi: 10.1002/dev.20071.