Bonney Glenn K, Coldham Chris, Adam Rene, Kaiser Gernot, Barroso Eduardo, Capussotti Lorenzo, Laurent Christophe, Verhoef Cees, Nuzzo Gennaro, Elias Dominique, Lapointe Real, Hubert Catherine, Lopez-Ben Santiago, Krawczyk Marek, Mirza Darius F
Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, United Kingdom.
J Surg Oncol. 2015 May;111(6):716-24. doi: 10.1002/jso.23899. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
The use of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in resectable synchronous liver metastasis is ill defined. The aim of this study was to evaluate neo-adjuvant chemotherapy on outcomes following liver resection for synchronous CLM.
An analysis of a multi-centric cohort from the LiverMetSurvey International Registry, who had undergone curative resections for synchronous CLM was undertaken. Patients who received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy prior to liver surgery (group NAS; n = 693) were compared with those treated by surgery alone (group SG; n = 608). Baseline clinicopathological variables were compared. Predictors of overall (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) were subsequently identified.
Clinicopathological comparison of the groups revealed a greater proportion of solitary metastasis in the SG compared to the NAS group (58.8% versus 38.4%; P < 0.001) therefore a separate analysis of solitary versus multi-centric analysis was performed. N-stage (> N1), number of metastasis (> 3), serum CEA (> 5 ng/ml) and no adjuvant chemotherapy independently predicted poorer OS, while N-stage (> N1), serum CEA (> 5 ng/ml) and no adjuvant chemotherapy independently predicted poorer DFS. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy did not independently affect outcome.
We present an analysis of a large multi-center series of the role of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in resectable CLM and demonstrate no survival advantage in this setting.
可切除的同步性肝转移中应用新辅助化疗的情况尚不明确。本研究旨在评估新辅助化疗对同步性结直肠癌肝转移(CLM)肝切除术后结局的影响。
对国际肝脏转移瘤调查登记处的一个多中心队列进行分析,这些患者均接受了同步性CLM的根治性切除。将肝手术前接受新辅助化疗的患者(NAS组;n = 693)与单纯接受手术治疗的患者(SG组;n = 608)进行比较。比较基线临床病理变量。随后确定总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)的预测因素。
两组的临床病理比较显示,与NAS组相比,SG组中孤立性转移的比例更高(58.8%对38.4%;P < 0.001),因此对孤立性与多中心性分析进行了单独分析。N分期(> N1)、转移灶数量(> 3个)、血清癌胚抗原(CEA)(> 5 ng/ml)以及未接受辅助化疗独立预测较差的OS,而N分期(> N1)、血清CEA(> 5 ng/ml)和未接受辅助化疗独立预测较差的DFS。新辅助化疗并未独立影响结局。
我们对新辅助化疗在可切除CLM中的作用进行了一项大型多中心系列分析,结果表明在这种情况下并无生存优势。