Orczyk John J, Garraghty Preston E
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA ; Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Neural Plast. 2015;2015:290819. doi: 10.1155/2015/290819. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
The concept of homeostatic plasticity postulates that neurons maintain relatively stable rates of firing despite changing inputs. Homeostatic and use-dependent plasticity mechanisms operate concurrently, although they have different requirements for induction. Depriving central somatosensory neurons of their primary activating inputs reduces activity and results in compensatory changes that favor excitation. Both a reduction of GABAergic inhibition and increase in glutamatergic excitatory transmission are observed in input-deprived cortex. Topographic reorganization of the adult somatosensory cortex is likely driven by both homeostatic and use-dependent mechanisms. Plasticity is induced by changes in the strengths of synaptic inputs, as well as changes in temporal correlation of neuronal activity. However, there is less certainty regarding the in vivo contribution of homeostatic mechanisms as in vitro experiments rely on manipulations that create states that do not normally occur in the living nervous system. Homeostatic plasticity seems to occur, but more in vivo research is needed to determine mechanisms. In vitro research is also needed but should better conform to conditions that might occur naturally in vivo.
稳态可塑性的概念假定,尽管输入发生变化,神经元仍能维持相对稳定的放电速率。稳态可塑性机制和使用依赖性可塑性机制同时起作用,尽管它们对诱导的要求不同。剥夺中枢体感神经元的主要激活输入会降低其活性,并导致有利于兴奋的代偿性变化。在输入被剥夺的皮层中,既能观察到GABA能抑制的减少,也能观察到谷氨酸能兴奋性传递的增加。成人体感皮层的拓扑重组可能是由稳态机制和使用依赖性机制共同驱动的。可塑性是由突触输入强度的变化以及神经元活动的时间相关性变化所诱导的。然而,由于体外实验依赖于创造在活体神经系统中通常不会出现的状态的操作,因此稳态机制在体内的作用尚不太确定。稳态可塑性似乎会发生,但需要更多的体内研究来确定其机制。也需要进行体外研究,但应更好地符合体内可能自然发生的条件。