• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

男孩接种人乳头瘤病毒疫苗预防口咽癌的成本效益分析。

A cost-effectiveness analysis of human papillomavirus vaccination of boys for the prevention of oropharyngeal cancer.

作者信息

Graham Donna M, Isaranuwatchai Wanrudee, Habbous Steven, de Oliveira Claire, Liu Geoffrey, Siu Lillian L, Hoch Jeffrey S

机构信息

Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Pharmacoeconomics Research Unit, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Cancer. 2015 Jun 1;121(11):1785-92. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29111. Epub 2015 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.29111
PMID:25867018
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many western countries have established female human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programs for the prevention of cervical cancer. The quadrivalent HPV vaccine (HPV4) has proven efficacy against additional HPV-related disease in both sexes, but the cost effectiveness of male HPV vaccination remains controversial. To assess the cost effectiveness of male HPV vaccination in Canada with respect to oropharyngeal cancer (OPC), the authors performed a preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis.

METHODS

After an extensive literature review regarding HPV-related OPC in Canadian males, health care costs and clinical effectiveness estimates were obtained. A Markov model was used to compare the potential costs and effectiveness of HPV4 versus no vaccination among boys aged 12 years. A theoretical cohort based on a Canadian population of 192,940 boys aged 12 years in 2012 was assumed to apply the model. A 3-month cycle length was used with a "lifetime" time horizon. The outcome of the analysis was the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Sensitivity analyses were conducted on variables, including the vaccine uptake rate and vaccine efficacy.

RESULTS

Assuming 99% vaccine efficacy and 70% uptake, HPV4 produced 0.05 more QALYs and saved $145 Canadian dollars (CAD) per individual compared with no vaccine (QALYs and costs were discounted at 5% per year). Assuming 50% vaccine efficacy and 50% uptake, HPV4 produced 0.023 more QALYs and saved $42 CAD. The results indicated that HPV4 in males may potentially save between $8 and $28 million CAD for the theoretical cohort of 192,940 over its lifetime.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of this model, HPV vaccination for boys aged 12 years may be a cost-effective strategy for the prevention of OPC in Canada.

摘要

背景

许多西方国家已制定女性人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种计划以预防宫颈癌。四价HPV疫苗(HPV4)已被证明对两性的其他HPV相关疾病均有效,但男性HPV疫苗接种的成本效益仍存在争议。为评估在加拿大针对口咽癌(OPC)进行男性HPV疫苗接种的成本效益,作者进行了一项初步成本效益分析。

方法

在对加拿大男性中与HPV相关的OPC进行广泛文献综述后,获得了医疗保健成本和临床效果评估。使用马尔可夫模型比较12岁男孩接种HPV4与不接种疫苗的潜在成本和效果。假设以2012年加拿大192,940名12岁男孩的人群为理论队列来应用该模型。使用3个月的周期长度和“终生”时间范围。分析结果是每质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本。对包括疫苗接种率和疫苗效力在内的变量进行了敏感性分析。

结果

假设疫苗效力为99%且接种率为70%,与不接种疫苗相比,HPV4每人产生的QALY多0.05个,节省145加元(CAD)(QALY和成本按每年5%进行贴现)。假设疫苗效力为50%且接种率为50%,HPV4产生的QALY多0.023个,节省42加元CAD。结果表明,对于192,940人的理论队列,HPV4在其终生可能潜在节省800万至2800万加元CAD。

结论

基于该模型,对12岁男孩进行HPV疫苗接种可能是加拿大预防OPC的一种具有成本效益的策略。

相似文献

1
A cost-effectiveness analysis of human papillomavirus vaccination of boys for the prevention of oropharyngeal cancer.男孩接种人乳头瘤病毒疫苗预防口咽癌的成本效益分析。
Cancer. 2015 Jun 1;121(11):1785-92. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29111. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
2
Comparative cost-effectiveness of the quadrivalent and bivalent human papillomavirus vaccines: a transmission-dynamic modeling study.四价和二价人乳头瘤病毒疫苗的成本效益比较:基于传播动力学模型的研究。
Vaccine. 2013 Aug 20;31(37):3863-71. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.06.064. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
3
Incremental cost-effectiveness evaluation of vaccinating girls against cervical cancer pre- and post-sexual debut in Belgium.比利时对女孩进行宫颈癌疫苗接种的成本效益评价:性活跃前和性活跃后的影响
Vaccine. 2013 Aug 20;31(37):3962-71. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.06.008. Epub 2013 Jun 15.
4
Cost-effectiveness and equity impacts of three HPV vaccination programmes for school-aged girls in New Zealand.新西兰三种 HPV 疫苗接种方案对在校女生的成本效益和公平性影响。
Vaccine. 2014 May 7;32(22):2645-56. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.071. Epub 2014 Mar 22.
5
Cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination in the context of high cervical cancer incidence and low screening coverage.在宫颈癌发病率高和筛查覆盖率低的情况下,HPV 疫苗接种的成本效益。
Vaccine. 2017 Nov 1;35(46):6329-6335. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.08.083. Epub 2017 Sep 9.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of the introduction of the human papillomavirus vaccine in Honduras.在洪都拉斯引入人乳头瘤病毒疫苗的成本效益分析。
Vaccine. 2015 May 7;33 Suppl 1:A167-73. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.12.067.
7
Health and Economic Impact of Switching from a 4-Valent to a 9-Valent HPV Vaccination Program in the United States.美国从四价人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种计划转换为九价人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种计划对健康和经济的影响。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Oct 4;108(1). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv282. Print 2016 Jan.
8
Modeling the impact of the difference in cross-protection data between a human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine and a human papillomavirus (HPV)-6/11/16/18 vaccine in Canada.建模加拿大人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)-16/18 AS04 佐剂疫苗和人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)-6/11/16/18 疫苗之间交叉保护数据差异的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Oct 13;12:872. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-872.
9
Comparing the cost-effectiveness of two- and three-dose schedules of human papillomavirus vaccination: a transmission-dynamic modelling study.比较人乳头瘤病毒疫苗两剂次和三剂次接种方案的成本效益:一项传播动力学建模研究。
Vaccine. 2014 Oct 7;32(44):5845-53. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.07.099. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
10
Could the human papillomavirus vaccination be cost-effective in males for the prevention of oropharyngeal cancer?人乳头瘤病毒疫苗对男性预防口咽癌是否具有成本效益?
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014 Dec;14(6):763-5. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2014.946012. Epub 2014 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Association Between Human Papillomavirus Vaccination and the Risk of Hashimoto's Thyroiditis: A Cross-Sectional Study.人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种与桥本甲状腺炎风险之间的关联:一项横断面研究。
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Apr 30;13(5):490. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13050490.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of HPV vaccination for the prevention of oropharyngeal cancer in Chinese adolescent males.中国青少年男性人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种预防口咽癌的成本效益分析
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 24;13:1584956. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1584956. eCollection 2025.
3
Acceptance of human papillomavirus vaccine among boys in Asia: A narrative review.
亚洲男孩对人乳头瘤病毒疫苗的接受程度:一项叙述性综述。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024 Dec 31;20(1):2429894. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2429894. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
4
Incremental net benefit of extending human papillomavirus vaccine to boys in oropharyngeal cancer burden: Meta-analysis of cost-effectiveness studies.将人乳头瘤病毒疫苗扩展至男孩对减轻口咽癌负担的增量净效益:成本效益研究的荟萃分析
J Dent Sci. 2024 Oct;19(4):2045-2056. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.05.032. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
5
Trends in Head and Neck Cancer Mortality from 1999 to 2019 in Japan: An Observational Analysis.1999年至2019年日本头颈癌死亡率趋势:一项观察性分析
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 26;15(15):3786. doi: 10.3390/cancers15153786.
6
Recent Developments in Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccinology.人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗学的最新进展。
Viruses. 2023 Jun 26;15(7):1440. doi: 10.3390/v15071440.
7
Accounting for Adverse Events Following Immunization in Economic Evaluation: Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations of Pediatric Vaccines Against Pneumococcus, Rotavirus, Human Papillomavirus, Meningococcus and Measles-Mumps-Rubella-Varicella.在经济评估中考虑免疫接种后的不良事件:对预防肺炎球菌、轮状病毒、人乳头瘤病毒、脑膜炎球菌以及麻疹-腮腺炎-风疹-水痘的儿科疫苗经济评估的系统评价
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 May;41(5):481-497. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01252-z. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
8
The Role of HPV in Determining Treatment, Survival, and Prognosis of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.人乳头瘤病毒在决定头颈部鳞状细胞癌的治疗、生存及预后方面的作用
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 3;14(17):4321. doi: 10.3390/cancers14174321.
9
HPV vaccine for men: Where to? (Review).男性人乳头瘤病毒疫苗:何去何从?(综述)
Exp Ther Med. 2021 Nov;22(5):1266. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10701. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
10
An economic and disease transmission model of human papillomavirus and oropharyngeal cancer in Texas.德克萨斯州人乳头瘤病毒和口咽癌的经济和疾病传播模型。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 19;11(1):1802. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81375-5.