• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Exploring the challenges of implementing e-health: a protocol for an update of a systematic review of reviews.探索实施电子健康的挑战:一项对综述的系统评价进行更新的方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 13;5(4):e006773. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006773.
2
Addressing the evidence to practice gap for complex interventions in primary care: a systematic review of reviews protocol.解决初级保健中复杂干预措施的证据与实践差距:一项综述方案的系统评价
BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 23;4(6):e005548. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005548.
3
Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update).影响电子健康实施的因素:系统评价的系统综述(更新版)
Implement Sci. 2016 Oct 26;11(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0510-7.
4
Protocol for a qualitative synthesis of barriers and facilitators in implementing guidelines for diagnosis of tuberculosis.结核病诊断指南实施中障碍与促进因素定性综合分析方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 9;7(6):e013717. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013717.
5
Scoping review protocol to map the use of text-based two-way communication between patients and healthcare professionals after hospital discharge and identify facilitators and barriers to implementation.范围综述方案,用于绘制患者和医疗保健专业人员在出院后的基于文本的双向沟通使用情况,并确定实施的促进因素和障碍。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 22;12(9):e062087. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062087.
6
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
7
Implementation of e-mental health interventions for informal caregivers of adults with chronic diseases: a protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review with a qualitative comparative analysis.电子心理健康干预在慢性病成人非正式照护者中的实施:一项混合方法系统评价及定性比较分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 21;10(6):e035406. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035406.
8
Systematic review protocol: an assessment of the post-approval challenges of autologous CAR-T therapy delivery.系统评价方案:自体嵌合抗原受体T细胞(CAR-T)疗法批准后实施挑战的评估
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 4;9(7):e026172. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026172.
9
Implementation outcome assessment instruments used in physical healthcare settings and their measurement properties: a systematic review protocol.用于物理医疗保健环境的实施结果评估工具及其测量特性:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 8;7(10):e017972. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017972.
10
Barriers and facilitators in providing oral health care to nursing home residents, from the perspective of care aides-a systematic review protocol.从护理助手的角度看为养老院居民提供口腔保健的障碍与促进因素——一项系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 7;5:53. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0231-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Tailoring Educational Content for T2DM Patients: A Qualitative Study on Preferences for Interactive Multimedia Applications.为2型糖尿病患者量身定制教育内容:关于交互式多媒体应用偏好的定性研究
J ASEAN Fed Endocr Soc. 2025 May;40(1):45-52. doi: 10.15605/jafes.040.01.18. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
2
Application of telemedicine to improve access, and quality of healthcare services in Somalia: a perspective review and policy recommendations.应用远程医疗改善索马里医疗服务的可及性和质量:一项前瞻性综述及政策建议
Pan Afr Med J. 2024 Nov 29;49:100. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2024.49.100.38299. eCollection 2024.
3
Population health interventions for cardiometabolic diseases in primary care: a scoping review and RE-AIM evaluation of current practices.基层医疗中针对心脏代谢疾病的人群健康干预措施:当前实践的范围综述和RE-AIM评估
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 4;10:1275267. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1275267. eCollection 2023.
4
Patients' perceptions of telehealth video visits experience in primary healthcare setting, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯初级医疗保健环境中患者对远程医疗视频问诊体验的认知
J Family Med Prim Care. 2023 Nov;12(11):2676-2684. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2269_22. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
5
Co-Creation in Health 4.0 as a New Solution for a New Era.健康4.0中的共创作为新时代的新解决方案。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 27;11(3):363. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030363.
6
App development in a sports science setting: A systematic review and lessons learned from an exemplary setting to generate recommendations for the app development process.体育科学环境中的应用程序开发:一项系统综述以及从一个典型案例中汲取的经验教训,以为应用程序开发过程提供建议。
Front Sports Act Living. 2023 Jan 4;4:1012239. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.1012239. eCollection 2022.
7
The Current Status of Telemedicine Technology Use Across the World Health Organization European Region: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.《世卫组织欧洲区域内远程医疗技术使用的现状:系统评价概述》。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 27;24(10):e40877. doi: 10.2196/40877.
8
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceptions of Jordanians Toward Adopting and Using Telemedicine: National Cross-sectional Study.约旦人对采用和使用远程医疗的知识、态度和认知:全国横断面研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Nov 4;9(4):e41499. doi: 10.2196/41499.
9
The SMILe integrated care model in allogeneic SteM cell TransplantatIon faciLitated by eHealth: a protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation randomised controlled trial.SMILe 整合照护模式在异体干细胞移植中的应用:一项基于电子健康的混合有效性-实施随机对照试验方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 20;22(1):1067. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08293-8.
10
Sixteen years of eHealth experiences in Iran: a qualitative content analysis of national policies.十六年来伊朗的电子健康经验:国家政策的定性内容分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Dec 11;19(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00795-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Electronic health records, adoption, quality of care, legal and privacy issues and their implementation in emergency departments.电子健康记录、采用情况、医疗质量、法律和隐私问题及其在急诊科的实施
Health Policy. 2015 Mar;119(3):287-97. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.11.014. Epub 2014 Nov 29.
2
Role of mobile phone technology in health education in Asian and African countries: a systematic review.手机技术在亚洲和非洲国家健康教育中的作用:一项系统综述。
Int J Electron Healthc. 2014;7(4):269-86. doi: 10.1504/IJEH.2014.064327.
3
Addressing the evidence to practice gap for complex interventions in primary care: a systematic review of reviews protocol.解决初级保健中复杂干预措施的证据与实践差距:一项综述方案的系统评价
BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 23;4(6):e005548. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005548.
4
Technology as system innovation: a key informant interview study of the application of the diffusion of innovation model to telecare.作为系统创新的技术:一项关于创新扩散模型在远程护理应用的关键 informant 访谈研究 。 注:这里“informant”常见释义为“提供消息者”“举报人”等,结合语境可能是指关键信息提供者之类的角色,但原文表述稍显模糊。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014 Jan;9(1):79-87. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2013.823573. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
5
Health information technology and sociotechnical systems: a progress report on recent developments within the UK National Health Service (NHS).健康信息技术与社会技术系统:英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)近期发展的进展报告
Appl Ergon. 2014 Mar;45(2):150-61. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.07.004. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
6
Factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of e-health systems: an explanatory systematic review.促进或抑制电子健康系统实施的因素:解释性系统评价。
Bull World Health Organ. 2012 May 1;90(5):357-64. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.099424.
7
E-health in low- and middle-income countries: findings from the Center for Health Market Innovations.中低收入国家的电子健康:来自健康市场创新中心的研究结果。
Bull World Health Organ. 2012 May 1;90(5):332-40. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.099820.
8
Improving the credibility of electronic health technologies.提高电子健康技术的可信度。
Bull World Health Organ. 2012 May 1;90(5):323-323A. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.099804.

探索实施电子健康的挑战:一项对综述的系统评价进行更新的方案

Exploring the challenges of implementing e-health: a protocol for an update of a systematic review of reviews.

作者信息

Ross Jamie, Stevenson Fiona, Lau Rosa, Murray Elizabeth

机构信息

e-Health Unit, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 13;5(4):e006773. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006773.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006773
PMID:25869685
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4401858/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is great potential for e-health to deliver cost-effective, quality healthcare and spending on e-health systems by governments and healthcare systems is increasing worldwide. However, the literature often describes problematic and unsuccessful attempts to implement these new technologies into routine clinical practice. To understand and address the challenges of implementing e-health, a systematic review was conducted in 2009, which identified several conceptual barriers and facilitators to implementation. As technology is rapidly changing and new e-health solutions are constantly evolving to meet the needs of current practice, an update of this review is deemed necessary to understand current challenges to the implementation of e-health. This research aims to identify, summarise and synthesise currently available evidence, by undertaking a systematic review of reviews to explore the barriers and facilitators to implementing e-health across a range of healthcare settings.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a protocol for an update of a systematic review of reviews. We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PSYCINFO and The Cochrane Library for studies published between 2009 and 2014. We will check reference lists of included studies for further studies. Two authors will independently screen the titles and abstracts identified from the search; any discrepancies will be resolved by discussion and consensus. Full-text papers will be obtained and relevant reviews will be selected against inclusion criteria. Eligible reviews have to be based on the implementation of e-health technologies. Data from eligible reviews will be extracted using a data abstraction form. A thematic analysis of barriers and facilitators to e-health implementation will be conducted.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required. The permission of the original authors to update the review was sought and granted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42015017661.

摘要

引言

电子健康在提供具有成本效益的优质医疗保健方面具有巨大潜力,世界各国政府和医疗保健系统在电子健康系统上的支出也在不断增加。然而,文献中经常描述在将这些新技术应用于常规临床实践时存在问题且未成功的尝试。为了理解和应对实施电子健康的挑战,2009年进行了一项系统评价,确定了实施过程中的几个概念性障碍和促进因素。由于技术在迅速变化,新的电子健康解决方案也在不断发展以满足当前实践的需求,因此认为有必要对该评价进行更新,以了解当前电子健康实施面临的挑战。本研究旨在通过对综述进行系统评价,识别、总结和综合现有证据,以探讨在一系列医疗保健环境中实施电子健康的障碍和促进因素。

方法与分析

这是一项对综述进行更新的系统评价方案。我们将检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、PSYCINFO和考克兰图书馆,查找2009年至2014年发表的研究。我们将检查纳入研究的参考文献列表以获取更多研究。两位作者将独立筛选检索到的标题和摘要;任何差异将通过讨论和达成共识来解决。将获取全文论文,并根据纳入标准选择相关综述。符合条件的综述必须基于电子健康技术的实施。将使用数据提取表从符合条件的综述中提取数据。将对电子健康实施的障碍和促进因素进行主题分析。

伦理与传播

无需伦理批准。已寻求并获得原作者对更新该综述的许可。

试验注册号

PROSPERO CRD42015017661。