Khan Alaptagin, McCormack Hannah C, Bolger Elizabeth A, McGreenery Cynthia E, Vitaliano Gordana, Polcari Ann, Teicher Martin H
Developmental Biopsychiatry Research Program, McLean Hospital , Belmont, MA , USA ; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School , Belmont, MA , USA.
Developmental Biopsychiatry Research Program, McLean Hospital , Belmont, MA , USA.
Front Psychiatry. 2015 Mar 30;6:42. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00042. eCollection 2015.
The adverse childhood experience (ACE) study found that risk for depression increased as a function of number of types of childhood maltreatment, and interpret this as a result of cumulative stress. An alternative hypothesis is that risk depends on type and timing of maltreatment. This will also present as a linear increase, since exposure to more types of abuse increases likelihood of experiencing a critical type of abuse at a critical age.
560 (223M/337F) young adults (18-25 years) were recruited from the community without regard to diagnosis and balanced to have equal exposure to 0-4 plus types of maltreatment. The Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure Scale assessed severity of exposure to 10 types of maltreatment across each year of childhood. Major depressive disorder (MDD) and current symptoms were evaluated by SCID, interview, and self-report. Predictive analytics assessed importance of exposure at each age and evaluated whether exposure at one or two ages was a more important predictor than number, severity, or duration of maltreatment across childhood.
The most important predictors of lifetime history of MDD were non-verbal emotional abuse in males and peer emotional abuse (EA) in females at 14 years of age, and these were more important predictors across models than number of types of maltreatment (males: t 9 = 16.39, p < 10(-7); females t 9 = 5.78, p < 10(-4)). Suicidal ideation was predicted, in part, by NVEA and peer EA at age 14, but most importantly by parental verbal abuse at age 5 in males and sexual abuse at age 18 in females.
This study provides evidence for sensitive exposure periods when maltreatment maximally impacts risk for depression, and provides an alternative interpretation of the ACE study results. These findings fit with emerging neuroimaging evidence for regional sensitivity periods. The presence of sensitive exposure periods has important implications for prevention, preemption, and treatment of MDD.
童年不良经历(ACE)研究发现,抑郁风险随着童年期虐待类型数量的增加而上升,并将此解释为累积压力的结果。另一种假设是,风险取决于虐待的类型和时机。这也会呈现为线性增长,因为遭受更多类型的虐待会增加在关键年龄经历关键类型虐待的可能性。
从社区招募了560名(223名男性/337名女性)年轻人(18 - 25岁),不考虑诊断情况,且使他们平均接触0至4种及以上类型的虐待。虐待暴露时间顺序量表评估了童年各年中遭受10种虐待类型的暴露严重程度。通过结构化临床访谈量表(SCID)、访谈和自我报告来评估重度抑郁症(MDD)及当前症状。预测分析评估了各年龄暴露的重要性,并评估了在一个或两个年龄的暴露是否比童年期虐待的类型数量、严重程度或持续时间更重要的预测因素。
男性一生中患MDD的最重要预测因素是14岁时的非言语情感虐待,女性是同伴情感虐待(EA),并且在所有模型中,这些因素比虐待类型数量更重要(男性:t9 = 16.39,p < 10^(-7);女性t9 = 5.78,p < 10^(-4))。自杀意念部分由14岁时的非言语情感虐待和同伴情感虐待预测,但最重要的是男性5岁时的父母言语虐待和女性18岁时的性虐待。
本研究为虐待对抑郁风险产生最大影响的敏感暴露期提供了证据,并对ACE研究结果提供了另一种解释。这些发现与新出现的关于区域敏感期的神经影像学证据相符。敏感暴露期的存在对MDD的预防、抢先干预和治疗具有重要意义。