• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: 12-year single center experience.微创主动脉瓣置换术:12年单中心经验
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Mar;4(2):160-9. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2014.12.05.
2
3
Right anterior minithoracotomy for aortic valve replacement: 10-year experience of a single center.右前迷你开胸术在主动脉瓣置换术中的应用:单中心 10 年经验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Sep;150(3):548-56.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.06.045. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
4
Full sternotomy versus right anterior minithoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a propensity-matched study †.八十岁老人单纯主动脉瓣置换术采用全胸骨切开术与右前小切口开胸术的比较:一项倾向匹配研究†
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Jun;20(6):732-41; discussion 741. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv030. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
5
Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis.微创与传统主动脉瓣置换术:倾向评分分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Sep;96(3):837-43. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.04.102. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
6
Alternative incision sutureless aortic valve replacement: propensity matched comparison between partial sternotomy and right anterior minithoracotomy.替代切口无缝线主动脉瓣置换术:部分胸骨切开术与右前小切口胸廓切开术之间的倾向匹配比较。
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2018 Apr;66(2):170-179. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4725.17.04568-6. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
7
Sutureless implantation of the perceval s aortic valve prosthesis through right anterior minithoracotomy.经右前小开胸行 Perceval S 主动脉瓣假体无缝合植入。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Dec;96(6):2101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.007. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
8
Reoperative aortic valve replacement in the octogenarians-minimally invasive technique in the era of transcatheter valve replacement.高龄患者再次行主动脉瓣置换术——经导管主动脉瓣置换时代的微创技术。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;147(1):155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.08.076. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
9
Minimally Invasive Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement With the Perceval S Bioprosthesis Through Ministernotomy: A Single-Center Experience.经胸骨上段小切口使用Perceval S生物瓣膜进行微创无缝合主动脉瓣置换术:单中心经验
Cureus. 2020 Oct 28;12(10):e11212. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11212.
10
A comparison of aortic valve replacement via an anterior right minithoracotomy with standard sternotomy: a propensity score analysis of 492 patients.经右前小切口主动脉瓣置换术与标准胸骨切开术的比较:492例患者的倾向评分分析
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Feb;49(2):456-63. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv038. Epub 2015 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Right Anterior Minithoracotomy Approach for Aortic Valve Replacement.右前小切口开胸入路行主动脉瓣置换术
Innovations (Phila). 2024 Sep-Oct;19(5):494-508. doi: 10.1177/15569845241276876. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
2
Minimally Invasive and Full Sternotomy Aortic Valve Replacements Lead to Comparable Long-Term Outcomes in Elderly Higher-Risk Patients: A Propensity-Matched Comparison.微创与全胸骨切开主动脉瓣置换术在老年高危患者中导致相似的长期结局:一项倾向匹配比较。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Mar 31;11(4):112. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11040112.
3
A comparative study of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with sutureless biological versus mechanical prostheses.无缝合生物瓣膜与机械瓣膜用于微创主动脉瓣置换的对比研究。
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2023 Jun;20(2):77-82. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2023.129542. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
4
Propensity-score matched comparison between minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement.微创与传统主动脉瓣置换术的倾向评分匹配比较。
Croat Med J. 2022 Oct 31;63(5):423-430. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2022.63.423.
5
Converging rapid deployment prostheses with minimal access surgery: analysis of early outcomes.将快速部署假体与微创外科相结合:早期结果分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Dec 27;16(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01739-w.
6
Surgery of ascending aorta with complex procedures for aortic dissection through upper mini-sternotomy versus conventional sternotomy.经上半部分胸骨正中切口与传统胸骨正中切口行升主动脉手术治疗复杂主动脉夹层的对比研究
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Apr 7;15(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01095-1.
7
Does minimal invasive cardiac surgery reduce the incidence of post-operative atrial fibrillation?微创心脏手术是否会降低术后心房颤动的发生率?
Ann Card Anaesth. 2020 Jan-Mar;23(1):7-13. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_158_18.
8
Minimal invasive aortic valve replacement: associations of radiological assessments with procedure complexity.微创主动脉瓣置换术:放射学评估与手术复杂性的关联
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Oct 12;14(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s13019-019-0997-5.
9
Efficacy of Aortic Valve Replacement through Full Sternotomy and Minimal Invasion (Ministernotomy).经胸骨正中切口和微创(小切口胸骨切开术)行主动脉瓣置换术的疗效。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2018 Apr 28;54(2):26. doi: 10.3390/medicina54020026.
10
Stonehenge technique is associated with faster aortic clamp time in group of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement via right infra-axillary thoracotomy.在经右腋下胸壁切开术进行微创主动脉瓣置换的患者组中,巨石阵技术与更短的主动脉阻断时间相关。
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Dec;66(12):700-706. doi: 10.1007/s11748-018-0987-x. Epub 2018 Aug 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Sutureless aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.无缝合主动脉瓣置换术:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Mar;4(2):100-11. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2014.06.01.
2
Ministernotomy or minithoracotomy for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.微创主动脉瓣置换术的胸骨下段切开术或小切口开胸术:一项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Jan;4(1):3-14. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2014.08.01.
3
Propensity score-matched analysis of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement.微创主动脉瓣置换术的倾向评分匹配分析
Circ J. 2014;78(12):2876-81. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
4
Right anterior thoracotomy aortic valve replacement is associated with less cost than sternotomy-based approaches: a multi-institution analysis of 'real world' data.右前开胸主动脉瓣置换术的费用低于基于胸骨切开术的方法:一项对“真实世界”数据的多机构分析。
J Med Econ. 2014 Dec;17(12):846-52. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2014.953681. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
5
A meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术微创与传统胸骨切开术的荟萃分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Oct;98(4):1499-511. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.05.060. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
6
Minimally invasive surgical treatment of valvular heart disease.心脏瓣膜病的微创外科治疗
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Spring;26(1):36-43. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2014.02.001. Epub 2014 Feb 15.
7
Aortic valve replacement via right minithoracotomy versus median sternotomy: a propensity score analysis.经右胸小切口与正中胸骨切开术行主动脉瓣置换术:倾向评分分析
Innovations (Phila). 2014 Mar-Apr;9(2):75-81; discussion 81. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000062.
8
A 16-year experience in minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: context for the changing management of aortic valve disease.16年微创主动脉瓣置换经验:主动脉瓣疾病管理变化的背景
Innovations (Phila). 2014 Mar-Apr;9(2):104-10; discussion 110. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000053.
9
Minimal invasive aortic valve replacement surgery is associated with improved survival: a propensity-matched comparison.微创主动脉瓣置换手术与生存率提高相关:一项倾向匹配比较。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Jan;47(1):11-7; discussion 17. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu068. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
10
Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: matched propensity score analysis of 808 patients.主动脉瓣置换术的微创胸骨切开术与传统胸骨切开术:808例患者的倾向评分匹配分析
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Aug;46(2):221-6; discussion 226-7. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt616. Epub 2014 Jan 20.

微创主动脉瓣置换术:12年单中心经验

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: 12-year single center experience.

作者信息

Gilmanov Daniyar, Solinas Marco, Farneti Pier Andrea, Cerillo Alfredo Giuseppe, Kallushi Enkel, Santarelli Filippo, Glauber Mattia

机构信息

Department of Adult Cardiac Surgery, Gabriele Monasterio Tuscany Foundation, G. Pasquinucci Heart hospital, Massa, MS 54100, Italy.

出版信息

Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Mar;4(2):160-9. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2014.12.05.

DOI:10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2014.12.05
PMID:25870812
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4384246/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study reports the single center experience on minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR), performed through a right anterior minithoracotomy or ministernotomy (MS).

METHODS

Eight hundred and fifty-three patients, who underwent MIAVR from 2002 to 2014, were retrospectively analyzed. Survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox multivariable proportional hazards regression model was developed to identify independent predictors of follow-up mortality.

RESULTS

Median age was 73.8, and 405 (47.5%) of patients were female. The overall 30-day mortality was 1.9%. Four hundred and forty-three (51.9%) and 368 (43.1%) patients received biological and sutureless prostheses, respectively. Median cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamping time were 108 and 75 minutes, respectively. Nineteen (2.2%) cases required conversion to full median sternotomy. Thirty-seven (4.3%) patients required re-exploration for bleeding. Perioperative stroke occurred in 15 (1.8%) patients, while transient ischemic attack occurred postoperative in 11 (1.3%). New onset atrial fibrillation was reported for 243 (28.5%) patients. After a median follow-up of 29.1 months (2,676.0 patient-years), survival rates at 1 and 5 years were 96%±1% and 80%±3%, respectively. Cox multivariable analysis showed that advanced age, history of cardiac arrhythmia, preoperative chronic renal failure, MS approach, prolonged mechanical ventilation and hospital stay as well as wound revision were associated with higher mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

MIAVR via both approaches is safe and feasible with excellent outcomes, and is associated with low conversion rate and low perioperative morbidity. Long term survival is at least comparable to that reported for conventional sternotomy AVR.

摘要

背景

本研究报告了通过右前小切口开胸或微创胸骨切开术(MS)进行微创主动脉瓣置换术(MIAVR)的单中心经验。

方法

回顾性分析了2002年至2014年接受MIAVR的853例患者。采用Kaplan-Meier法评估生存率。建立Cox多变量比例风险回归模型以确定随访死亡率的独立预测因素。

结果

中位年龄为73.8岁,405例(47.5%)患者为女性。总体30天死亡率为1.9%。分别有443例(51.9%)和368例(43.1%)患者接受了生物瓣膜和无缝线瓣膜假体。中位体外循环时间和主动脉阻断时间分别为108分钟和75分钟。19例(2.2%)病例需要转为全胸骨正中切开术。37例(4.3%)患者因出血需要再次手术探查。围手术期卒中发生在15例(1.8%)患者中,而术后短暂性脑缺血发作发生在11例(1.3%)患者中。243例(28.5%)患者报告新发房颤。中位随访29.1个月(2676.0患者年)后,1年和5年生存率分别为96%±1%和80%±3%。Cox多变量分析显示,高龄、心律失常病史、术前慢性肾功能衰竭、MS入路、机械通气和住院时间延长以及伤口修复与较高的死亡率相关。

结论

两种入路的MIAVR安全可行,效果良好,转换率低,围手术期发病率低。长期生存率至少与传统胸骨切开术主动脉瓣置换术报告的生存率相当。