• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管内栓塞术与外科夹闭术治疗颅内动脉瘤的比较:一项前瞻性研究。

Comparison of endovascular coiling and surgical clipping for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A prospective study.

作者信息

Taheri Zeinab, Harirchian Mohammad Hosein, Ghanaati Hosein, Khoshnevisan Alireza, Salamati Payman, Miri Mojtaba, Firouznia Kavous, Saeednejad Mina, Shakiba Madjid, Rahimi-Movaghar Vafa

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Iranian Center of Neurological Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Radiology, Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Iran J Neurol. 2015 Jan 5;14(1):22-8.

PMID:25874053
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4395803/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Management of intracranial aneurysms has made debates about the best treatment modality in recent years. The aim of this study was to compare the interventional outcomes between two groups of patients, one treated with endovascular coiling and the other treated with surgical clipping.

METHODS

This prospective study included 48 patients with intracranial aneurysms who underwent endovascular coiling (27 patients) or surgical clipping (21 patients) from July 2011 to August 2013. A neurologist examined patients in admission and followed them by phone call 1-year after intervention.

RESULTS

Mean modified Rankin Scale (MRS) score at the time of admission in endovascular group was 2.86 ± 0.974 whereas it was 3.81 ± 1.078 in surgical clipping group (P = 0.0040). Focal neurologic signs were higher in clipping during procedures (P = 0.0310). Of 37 patients who followed up for a year, 19 were in endovascular group and 18 in surgical clipping group. At 1 year follow-up, MRS improvement was statistically significant in coiling group (P = 0.0090), but not in clipping group (P = 0.8750). Mean difference of MRS score at the time of admission and at one year later, was 0.947 ± 1.224 in endovascular group and 0.111 ± 2.083 in surgical group (P = 0.3000).

CONCLUSION

There was no statistically significant difference at 1 year outcome between two groups. We recommend further interventional studies with larger sample sizes for better evaluation of the modalities.

摘要

背景

近年来,颅内动脉瘤的治疗引发了关于最佳治疗方式的争论。本研究的目的是比较两组患者的介入治疗结果,一组采用血管内栓塞治疗,另一组采用手术夹闭治疗。

方法

这项前瞻性研究纳入了2011年7月至2013年8月期间接受血管内栓塞治疗(27例患者)或手术夹闭治疗(21例患者)的48例颅内动脉瘤患者。一名神经科医生在患者入院时对其进行检查,并在干预后1年通过电话随访。

结果

血管内栓塞组入院时改良Rankin量表(MRS)平均评分为2.86±0.974,而手术夹闭组为3.81±1.078(P = 0.0040)。手术过程中夹闭时的局灶性神经体征更高(P = 0.0310)。在37例随访1年的患者中,血管内栓塞组19例,手术夹闭组18例。在1年随访时,栓塞组MRS改善具有统计学意义(P = 0.0090),而夹闭组无统计学意义(P = 0.8750)。血管内栓塞组入院时与1年后MRS评分的平均差值为0.947±1.224,手术组为0.111±2.083(P = 0.3000)。

结论

两组在1年结局上无统计学显著差异。我们建议进行更大样本量的进一步介入研究,以更好地评估这些治疗方式。

相似文献

1
Comparison of endovascular coiling and surgical clipping for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A prospective study.血管内栓塞术与外科夹闭术治疗颅内动脉瘤的比较:一项前瞻性研究。
Iran J Neurol. 2015 Jan 5;14(1):22-8.
2
Short-Term Outcome of Clipping Versus Coiling of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Treated by Dual-Trained Cerebrovascular Surgeon: Single-Institution Experience.由双资质脑血管外科医生治疗的破裂颅内动脉瘤夹闭术与血管内栓塞术的短期疗效:单机构经验
World Neurosurg. 2016 Nov;95:262-269. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.08.009. Epub 2016 Aug 13.
3
Cost-effectiveness of clipping vs coiling of intracranial aneurysms after subarachnoid hemorrhage in a developing country--a prospective study.发展中国家蛛网膜下腔出血后颅内动脉瘤夹闭术与血管内栓塞术的成本效益——一项前瞻性研究
Surg Neurol. 2009 Oct;72(4):355-60; discussion 360-1. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2008.11.003. Epub 2009 Jul 17.
4
Ruptured carotid-ophthalmic aneurysm treatment: a non-inferiority meta-analysis comparing endovascular coiling and surgical clipping.破裂性颈内动脉-眼动脉瘤的治疗:一项比较血管内栓塞术和手术夹闭术的非劣效性荟萃分析。
Br J Neurosurg. 2017 Jun;31(3):345-349. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2017.1297371. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
5
Is clipping better than coiling in the treatment of patients with oculomotor nerve palsies induced by posterior communicating artery aneurysms? A systematic review and meta-analysis.在治疗由后交通动脉瘤引起的动眼神经麻痹患者时,夹闭术是否优于栓塞术?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017 Feb;153:20-26. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.11.022. Epub 2016 Dec 11.
6
The durability of endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: 18 year follow-up of the UK cohort of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT).破裂性脑动脉瘤血管内栓塞与神经外科夹闭术的耐久性:国际蛛网膜下腔动脉瘤试验(ISAT)英国队列的18年随访
Lancet. 2015 Feb 21;385(9969):691-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60975-2. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
7
Analysis of cerebrovascular aneurysm treatment cost: retrospective cohort comparison of clipping, coiling, and flow diversion.分析脑血管瘤治疗费用:夹闭、弹簧圈栓塞和血流导向装置治疗的回顾性队列比较。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 May;44(5):E3. doi: 10.3171/2018.1.FOCUS17775.
8
Surgical clipping or endovascular coiling for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a pragmatic randomised trial.未破裂颅内动脉瘤的手术夹闭或血管内介入治疗:一项实用随机试验。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;88(8):663-668. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2016-315433. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
9
Long-term outcomes of treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysms in South Korea: clipping versus coiling.韩国颅内未破裂动脉瘤治疗的长期结果:夹闭术与血管内介入治疗的对比。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 Dec;10(12):1218-1222. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-013757. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
10
Endovascular Coiling versus Surgical Clipping of Very Small Ruptured Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms.血管内弹簧圈栓塞术与手术夹闭术治疗非常小的破裂前交通动脉瘤。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;126:e1246-e1250. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.074. Epub 2019 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment of Ruptured and Nonruptured Aneurysms Using a Semisolid Iodinated Embolic Agent.使用半固态含碘栓塞剂治疗破裂和未破裂的动脉瘤。
Adv Mater. 2022 Mar;34(10):e2108266. doi: 10.1002/adma.202108266. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
2
Does establishing a neurovascular unit improve the outcome after surgical clipping for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage? Results from a 5-year observational study in Kuwait.建立神经血管单元是否能改善动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血手术夹闭后的预后?来自科威特一项为期5年的观察性研究的结果。
Surg Neurol Int. 2021 Nov 2;12:547. doi: 10.25259/SNI_914_2021. eCollection 2021.
3
Cilioretinal Artery Occlusion after Endovascular Coil Embolization for Anterior Communicating Artery.前交通动脉血管内弹簧圈栓塞术后的睫状视网膜动脉阻塞
Brain Sci. 2021 Apr 25;11(5):542. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11050542.
4
Clinical Pharmacology of Clazosentan, a Selective Endothelin A Receptor Antagonist for the Prevention and Treatment of aSAH-Related Cerebral Vasospasm.氯唑沙坦的临床药理学,一种用于预防和治疗蛛网膜下腔出血相关脑血管痉挛的选择性内皮素A受体拮抗剂。
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Feb 4;11:628956. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.628956. eCollection 2020.
5
Psychometric Properties of the Patient Assessment of Own Functioning Inventory Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血后患者自身功能评估量表的心理计量学特性。
J Nurs Meas. 2020 Aug 1;28(2):205-228. doi: 10.1891/JNM-D-18-00117. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
6
Endovascular Coiling Versus Neurosurgical Clipping for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.血管内栓塞术与神经外科夹闭术治疗动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2019 Mar 26;11(3):e4320. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4320.

本文引用的文献

1
Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.老年患者颅内动脉瘤的血管内治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2013 Jul;44(7):1897-902. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001524. Epub 2013 May 16.
2
Clipping versus coiling for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.夹闭术与弹簧圈栓塞术治疗破裂颅内动脉瘤的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2013 Jan;44(1):29-37. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.663559. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
3
Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysm: a systematic review.血管内栓塞与开颅夹闭治疗颅内未破裂动脉瘤的系统评价。
BMC Neurol. 2012 Sep 22;12:99. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-12-99.
4
The impact of microsurgical clipping and endovascular coiling on the outcome of cerebral aneurysms in patients over 60 years of age.高龄患者脑动脉瘤采用显微夹闭术与血管内介入栓塞术治疗的效果对比。
J Clin Neurosci. 2012 Aug;19(8):1115-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.11.017. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
5
The importance of early brain injury after subarachnoid hemorrhage.蛛网膜下腔出血后早期脑损伤的重要性。
Prog Neurobiol. 2012 Apr;97(1):14-37. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.02.003. Epub 2012 Mar 10.
6
Hospitalization costs for endovascular and surgical treatment of ruptured aneurysms in the United States are substantially higher than Medicare payments.在美国,血管内治疗和手术治疗破裂动脉瘤的住院费用远高于医疗保险支付的费用。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Jun;33(6):1037-40. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2938. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
7
Current update on the randomized controlled trials of intracranial aneurysms.颅内动脉瘤随机对照试验的最新进展
Neurointervention. 2011 Feb;6(1):1-5. doi: 10.5469/neuroint.2011.6.1.1. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
8
Intracranial aneurysms: review of current treatment options and outcomes.颅内动脉瘤:当前治疗选择和结局的综述。
Front Neurol. 2011 Jul 8;2:45. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2011.00045. eCollection 2011.
9
Recanalization rates after endovascular coil embolization in a cohort of matched ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms.一组匹配的破裂和未破裂脑动脉瘤血管内弹簧圈栓塞后的再通率。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2011 Mar;17(1):27-35. doi: 10.1177/159101991101700106. Epub 2011 Apr 18.
10
Better outcomes with treatment by coiling relative to clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States, 2001-2008.美国 2001-2008 年未破裂颅内动脉瘤的血管内介入治疗(弹簧圈栓塞)相对于开颅夹闭手术的疗效更好。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Jun-Jul;32(6):1071-5. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2453. Epub 2011 Apr 21.