• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定用于评估恶性胸腔积液患者呼吸困难的视觉模拟量表的最小重要差异。

Defining the minimal important difference for the visual analogue scale assessing dyspnea in patients with malignant pleural effusions.

作者信息

Mishra Eleanor K, Corcoran John P, Hallifax Robert J, Stradling John, Maskell Nicholas A, Rahman Najib M

机构信息

Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine and Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.

University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Apr 15;10(4):e0123798. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123798. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0123798
PMID:25874452
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4398419/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The minimal important difference (MID) is essential for interpreting the results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Despite a number of RCTs in patients with malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) which use the visual analogue scale for dyspnea (VASD) as an outcome measure, the MID has not been established.

METHODS

Patients with suspected MPE undergoing a pleural procedure recorded their baseline VASD and their post-procedure VASD (24 hours after the pleural drainage), and in parallel assessed their breathlessness on a 7 point Likert scale.

FINDINGS

The mean decrease in VASD in patients with a MPE reporting a 'small but just worthwhile decrease' in their dyspnea (i.e. equivalent to the MID) was 19mm (95% CI 14-24mm). The mean drainage volume required to produce a change in VASD of 19mm was 760ml.

INTERPRETATION

The mean MID for the VASD in patients with a MPE undergoing a pleural procedure is 19mm (95% CI 14-24mm). Thus choosing an improvement of 19mm in the VASD would be justifiable in the design and analysis of future MPE studies.

摘要

背景

最小重要差异(MID)对于解释随机对照试验(RCT)的结果至关重要。尽管有多项针对恶性胸腔积液(MPE)患者的RCT使用视觉模拟呼吸困难量表(VASD)作为结局指标,但尚未确定MID。

方法

接受胸膜手术的疑似MPE患者记录其基线VASD和术后VASD(胸腔引流24小时后),并同时用7点李克特量表评估其呼吸困难程度。

结果

报告呼吸困难有“轻微但值得的减轻”(即相当于MID)的MPE患者VASD的平均降低值为19mm(95%CI 14 - 24mm)。产生19mm的VASD变化所需的平均引流量为760ml。

解读

接受胸膜手术的MPE患者VASD的平均MID为19mm(95%CI 14 - 24mm)。因此,在未来MPE研究的设计和分析中,选择VASD改善19mm是合理的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2adf/4398419/1e63be06f494/pone.0123798.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2adf/4398419/8830f2eb0ce5/pone.0123798.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2adf/4398419/0f6a4f0d4f14/pone.0123798.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2adf/4398419/45dfc73b12df/pone.0123798.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2adf/4398419/1e63be06f494/pone.0123798.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2adf/4398419/8830f2eb0ce5/pone.0123798.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2adf/4398419/0f6a4f0d4f14/pone.0123798.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2adf/4398419/45dfc73b12df/pone.0123798.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2adf/4398419/1e63be06f494/pone.0123798.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Defining the minimal important difference for the visual analogue scale assessing dyspnea in patients with malignant pleural effusions.确定用于评估恶性胸腔积液患者呼吸困难的视觉模拟量表的最小重要差异。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 15;10(4):e0123798. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123798. eCollection 2015.
2
Breathlessness Predicts Survival in Patients With Malignant Pleural Effusions: Meta-analysis of Individual Patient Data From Five Randomized Controlled Trials.呼吸困难预测恶性胸腔积液患者的生存:五项随机对照试验的个体患者数据的荟萃分析。
Chest. 2021 Jul;160(1):351-357. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.02.052. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
3
Comparison of modified Borg scale and visual analog scale dyspnea scores in predicting re-intervention after drainage of malignant pleural effusion.改良 Borg 量表和视觉模拟量表呼吸困难评分预测恶性胸腔积液引流后再干预的比较。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Nov;21(11):3109-16. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1895-3. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
4
Protocol of the Australasian Malignant Pleural Effusion-2 (AMPLE-2) trial: a multicentre randomised study of aggressive versus symptom-guided drainage via indwelling pleural catheters.澳大利亚恶性胸腔积液-2(AMPLE-2)试验方案:一项关于通过留置胸腔导管进行积极引流与症状引导引流的多中心随机研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 5;6(7):e011480. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011480.
5
Aggressive versus symptom-guided drainage of malignant pleural effusion via indwelling pleural catheters (AMPLE-2): an open-label randomised trial.留置胸膜导管治疗恶性胸腔积液的侵袭性与症状引导引流(AMPLE-2):一项开放标签随机试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Sep;6(9):671-680. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30288-1. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
6
OPTIMUM: a protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing Out Patient Talc slurry via Indwelling pleural catheter for Malignant pleural effusion vs Usual inpatient Management.OPTIMUM:一项多中心随机对照试验方案,比较经留置胸膜导管的门诊滑石粉悬液治疗恶性胸腔积液与常规住院治疗。
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 18;6(10):e012795. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012795.
7
Clinically occult primary fallopian tube carcinoma presenting as a malignant pleural effusion.以恶性胸腔积液为表现的临床隐匿性原发性输卵管癌。
Clin Respir J. 2017 Nov;11(6):1086-1090. doi: 10.1111/crj.12423. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
8
Interventions for the management of malignant pleural effusions: a network meta-analysis.恶性胸腔积液管理的干预措施:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 21;4(4):CD010529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010529.pub3.
9
Effect of an indwelling pleural catheter vs chest tube and talc pleurodesis for relieving dyspnea in patients with malignant pleural effusion: the TIME2 randomized controlled trial.留置胸腔导管与胸腔引流管和滑石粉胸膜固定术治疗恶性胸腔积液呼吸困难的效果:TIME2 随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2012 Jun 13;307(22):2383-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5535.
10
Prognosis of Cancer with Synchronous or Metachronous Malignant Pleural Effusion.恶性胸腔积液伴发或异时性恶性胸腔积液的预后。
Lung. 2017 Dec;195(6):775-779. doi: 10.1007/s00408-017-0050-1. Epub 2017 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Which clinical factors are predictive of outcome in primary spontaneous pneumothorax management?在原发性自发性气胸的治疗中,哪些临床因素可预测预后?
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2025 Jun 19;12(1):e003089. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2024-003089.
2
The Pneumothorax And Symptom Evaluation (PASE) study: Bendopnoea in patients with pneumothorax.气胸与症状评估(PASE)研究:气胸患者的胸壁运动性呼吸困难
Respirol Case Rep. 2024 Aug 6;12(8):e01443. doi: 10.1002/rcr2.1443. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Gravity- vs Wall Suction-Driven Large-Volume Thoracentesis: A Randomized Controlled Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of an indwelling pleural catheter vs chest tube and talc pleurodesis for relieving dyspnea in patients with malignant pleural effusion: the TIME2 randomized controlled trial.留置胸腔导管与胸腔引流管和滑石粉胸膜固定术治疗恶性胸腔积液呼吸困难的效果:TIME2 随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2012 Jun 13;307(22):2383-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5535.
2
Management of a malignant pleural effusion: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010.恶性胸腔积液的管理:英国胸科学会胸膜疾病指南2010
Thorax. 2010 Aug;65 Suppl 2:ii32-40. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.136994.
3
Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes.
重力驱动与壁层吸引驱动的大容量胸腔穿刺术:一项随机对照研究。
Chest. 2024 Dec;166(6):1573-1582. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.05.046. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
4
The third PLeuralEffusion And Symptom Evaluation (PLEASE-3) study: Bendopnoea in patients with pleural effusion.第三次胸腔积液与症状评估(PLEASE - 3)研究:胸腔积液患者的端坐呼吸
Respirol Case Rep. 2024 Jun 17;12(6):e01410. doi: 10.1002/rcr2.1410. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients with and without Non-Expandable Lung Secondary to Malignant Pleural Effusion-A Single-Centre Observational Study.恶性胸腔积液导致的不可扩张肺患者与无此情况患者的患者报告结局指标——一项单中心观察性研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jun 3;14(11):1176. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14111176.
6
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Pleural Effusions: A Systematic Review.胸腔积液患者报告的结局:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2024 Jan 17;16(1):e52430. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52430. eCollection 2024 Jan.
7
The randomised thoracoscopic talc poudrage+indwelling pleural catheters versus thoracoscopic talc poudrage only in malignant pleural effusion trial (TACTIC): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.随机胸腔镜滑石粉泼洒+留置胸腔引流管与单纯胸腔镜滑石粉泼洒治疗恶性胸腔积液的试验(TACTIC):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2023 May;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001682.
8
Prevalence of dyspnoea and usage of opioids in managing dyspnoea in advanced cancer patients: a longitudinal observational multi-centre study from India.晚期癌症患者呼吸困难的患病率及阿片类药物在治疗呼吸困难中的应用:一项来自印度的纵向观察性多中心研究。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2022 Dec 2;16:1482. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2022.1482. eCollection 2022.
9
Protocol for a prospective observational cohort study collecting data on demographics, symptoms and biomarkers in people with mesothelioma (ASSESS-meso).前瞻性观察队列研究协议,收集间皮瘤患者的人口统计学、症状和生物标志物数据(ASSESS-meso)。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 10;12(11):e060850. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060850.
10
Research policy in supportive care and palliative care for cancer dyspnea.癌症呼吸困难支持治疗和姑息治疗的研究政策。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 3;52(3):260-265. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyab193.
确定患者报告结局的反应性和最小重要差异的推荐方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;61(2):102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
4
Minimally clinically important difference for the UCSD Shortness of Breath Questionnaire, Borg Scale, and Visual Analog Scale.加州大学圣地亚哥分校呼吸急促问卷、博格量表和视觉模拟量表的最小临床重要差异。
COPD. 2005 Mar;2(1):105-10. doi: 10.1081/copd-200050655.
5
Measurement properties and interpretability of the Chronic respiratory disease questionnaire (CRQ).慢性呼吸系统疾病问卷(CRQ)的测量属性及可解释性
COPD. 2005 Mar;2(1):81-9. doi: 10.1081/copd-200050651.
6
Revisiting the relation between change and initial value: a review and evaluation.重新审视变化与初始值之间的关系:一项综述与评估。
Stat Med. 2007 Jan 30;26(2):443-57. doi: 10.1002/sim.2538.
7
Minimally important differences were estimated for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) instrument using a combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches.采用基于分布和锚定的方法相结合,对癌症治疗功能评估-结直肠癌(FACT-C)工具的最小重要差异进行了估计。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Dec;58(12):1241-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.008. Epub 2005 Oct 13.
8
Measuring the dyspnea of decompensated heart failure with a visual analog scale: how much improvement is meaningful?使用视觉模拟量表测量失代偿性心力衰竭患者的呼吸困难:多大程度的改善才有意义?
Congest Heart Fail. 2004 Jul-Aug;10(4):188-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-5299.2004.03475.x.
9
Issues for statisticians in conducting analyses and translating results for quality of life end points in clinical trials.统计学家在对临床试验中的生活质量终点进行分析和翻译结果时面临的问题。
J Biopharm Stat. 2004 Feb;14(1):73-96. doi: 10.1081/BIP-120028507.
10
Power of outcome measurements to detect clinically significant changes in pulmonary rehabilitation of patients with COPD.结果测量在检测慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺康复中具有临床意义变化方面的效能。
Chest. 2002 Apr;121(4):1092-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.4.1092.