• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在XLIF手术中全程进行触发式肌电图监测能否预测术后症状性神经失用症?一项前瞻性多中心试验的结果。

Can triggered electromyography monitoring throughout retraction predict postoperative symptomatic neuropraxia after XLIF? Results from a prospective multicenter trial.

作者信息

Uribe Juan S, Isaacs Robert E, Youssef Jim A, Khajavi Kaveh, Balzer Jeffrey R, Kanter Adam S, Küelling Fabrice A, Peterson Mark D

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery and Brain Repair, University of South Florida, 2 Tampa General Circle, Tampa, FL, 33606, USA,

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2015 Apr;24 Suppl 3:378-85. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3871-8. Epub 2015 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-015-3871-8
PMID:25874744
Abstract

PURPOSE

This multicenter study aims to evaluate the utility of triggered electromyography (t-EMG) recorded throughout psoas retraction during lateral transpsoas interbody fusion to predict postoperative changes in motor function.

METHODS

Three hundred and twenty-three patients undergoing L4-5 minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion from 21 sites were enrolled. Intraoperative data collection included initial t-EMG thresholds in response to posterior retractor blade stimulation and subsequent t-EMG threshold values collected every 5 min throughout retraction. Additional data collection included dimensions/duration of retraction as well as pre-and postoperative lower extremity neurologic exams.

RESULTS

Prior to expanding the retractor, the lowestt-EMG threshold was identified posterior to the retractor in 94 % of cases. Postoperatively, 13 (4.5 %) patients had a new motor weakness that was consistent with symptomatic neuropraxia (SN) of lumbar plexus nerves on the approach side. There were no significant differences between patients with or without a corresponding postoperative SN with respect to initial posterior blade reading (p = 0.600), or retraction dimensions (p > 0.05). Retraction time was significantly longer in those patients with SN vs. those without (p = 0.031). Stepwise logistic regression showed a significant positive relationship between the presence of new postoperative SN and total retraction time (p < 0.001), as well as change in t-EMG thresholds over time (p < 0.001), although false positive rates (increased threshold in patients with no new SN) remained high regardless of the absolute increase in threshold used to define an alarm criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged retraction time and coincident increases in t-EMG thresholds are predictors of declining nerve integrity. Increasing t-EMG thresholds, while predictive of injury, were also observed in a large number of patients without iatrogenic injury, with a greater predictive value in cases with extended duration. In addition to a careful approach with minimal muscle retraction and consistent lumbar plexus directional retraction, the incidence of postoperative motor neuropraxia may be reduced by limiting retraction time and utilizing t-EMG throughout retraction, while understanding that the specificity of this monitoring technique is low during initial retraction and increases with longer retraction duration.

摘要

目的

本多中心研究旨在评估在经腰大肌外侧椎间融合术中腰大肌牵开过程中记录的触发式肌电图(t-EMG)对预测术后运动功能变化的效用。

方法

纳入了来自21个地点的323例行L4-5微创外侧椎间融合术的患者。术中数据收集包括对后牵开器叶片刺激的初始t-EMG阈值,以及在整个牵开过程中每5分钟收集的后续t-EMG阈值。额外的数据收集包括牵开的尺寸/持续时间以及术前和术后的下肢神经学检查。

结果

在牵开器扩张之前,94%的病例在牵开器后方确定了最低的t-EMG阈值。术后,13例(4.5%)患者出现了新的运动无力,与手术入路侧腰丛神经的症状性神经失用症(SN)一致。有或没有相应术后SN的患者在初始后叶片读数(p = 0.600)或牵开尺寸(p > 0.05)方面没有显著差异。SN患者的牵开时间明显长于无SN患者(p = 0.031)。逐步逻辑回归显示,术后新SN的存在与总牵开时间(p < 0.001)以及t-EMG阈值随时间的变化(p < 0.001)之间存在显著正相关,尽管无论用于定义警报标准的阈值绝对增加多少,假阳性率(无新SN患者的阈值增加)仍然很高。

结论

牵开时间延长和t-EMG阈值同时增加是神经完整性下降的预测指标。t-EMG阈值增加虽然可预测损伤,但在大量无医源性损伤的患者中也有观察到,在持续时间延长的病例中预测价值更大。除了采用小心的方法尽量减少肌肉牵开并持续向腰丛方向牵开外,通过限制牵开时间并在整个牵开过程中使用t-EMG,可能会降低术后运动性神经失用症的发生率,同时要明白这种监测技术在初始牵开时特异性较低,而随着牵开持续时间延长特异性会增加。

相似文献

1
Can triggered electromyography monitoring throughout retraction predict postoperative symptomatic neuropraxia after XLIF? Results from a prospective multicenter trial.在XLIF手术中全程进行触发式肌电图监测能否预测术后症状性神经失用症?一项前瞻性多中心试验的结果。
Eur Spine J. 2015 Apr;24 Suppl 3:378-85. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3871-8. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
2
Trans-cranial motor evoked potential detection of femoral nerve injury in trans-psoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion.经颅运动诱发电位检测经腰大肌外侧腰椎椎间融合术中股神经损伤情况
J Clin Monit Comput. 2015 Oct;29(5):549-54. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9713-8. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
3
Dynamically evoked, discrete-threshold electromyography in the extreme lateral interbody fusion approach.动态诱发、离散阈值肌电图在极外侧椎间融合术中的应用。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Jan;14(1):31-7. doi: 10.3171/2010.9.SPINE09871. Epub 2010 Dec 17.
4
Use of motor evoked potentials during lateral lumbar interbody fusion reduces postoperative deficits.在侧路腰椎体间融合术中使用运动诱发电位可减少术后缺陷。
Spine J. 2018 Oct;18(10):1763-1778. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.02.024. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
5
Nerve injury after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 919 treated levels with identification of risk factors.腰椎侧路椎间融合术后神经损伤:919 个治疗节段的回顾分析及危险因素识别。
Spine J. 2014 May 1;14(5):749-58. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.066. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
6
Evaluation of retraction time as a predictor of postoperative motor dysfunction after minimally invasive transpsoas interbody fusion at L4-L5.评估L4-L5微创经腰大肌椎间融合术后回缩时间作为术后运动功能障碍预测指标的研究。
J Clin Neurosci. 2019 Mar;61:124-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.108. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
7
Femoral nerve and lumbar plexus injury after minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: electrodiagnostic prognostic indicators and a roadmap to recovery.微创外侧腹膜后经腰大肌入路后股神经和腰丛损伤:电诊断预后指标及恢复路径
Neurosurg Rev. 2018 Apr;41(2):457-464. doi: 10.1007/s10143-017-0863-7. Epub 2017 May 30.
8
Lateral mass screw stimulation thresholds in posterior cervical instrumentation surgery: a predictor of medial deviation.颈椎后路内固定手术中外侧块螺钉刺激阈值:内侧偏移的预测指标
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Mar;26(3):346-352. doi: 10.3171/2016.8.SPINE16580. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
9
An anatomical study of the lumbosacral plexus as related to the minimally invasive transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine.与腰椎微创经腰大肌入路相关的腰骶丛解剖学研究。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Feb;10(2):139-44. doi: 10.3171/2008.10.SPI08479.
10
The Oblique Anterolateral Approach to the Lumbar Spine Provides Access to the Lumbar Spine With Few Early Complications.腰椎斜前外侧入路可显露腰椎,早期并发症较少。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Sep;474(9):2020-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4883-3. Epub 2016 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The evolving role of lateral lumbar interbody fusion in lumbar fusion: challenging the dominance of transforaminal interbody fusion.腰椎外侧椎间融合术在腰椎融合中的角色演变:挑战经椎间孔椎间融合术的主导地位
J Spine Surg. 2025 Jun 27;11(2):396-399. doi: 10.21037/jss-2025-01. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
2
The "20-minute Rule" in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Fact or Fiction? A Multi-Center Analysis of 658 Patients.腰椎侧方椎间融合术中的“20分钟规则”:事实还是虚构?对658例患者的多中心分析
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar 15:21925682251321490. doi: 10.1177/21925682251321490.
3
Prone Transpsoas Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Disc Disease.

本文引用的文献

1
Monitoring lumbar plexus integrity in extreme lateral transpsoas approaches to the lumbar spine: a new protocol with anatomical bases.在腰椎极外侧经腰大肌入路中监测腰丛完整性:一种具有解剖学基础的新方案。
Eur Spine J. 2015 May;24(5):1051-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3801-9. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
2
Extreme lateral approach to the spine in degenerative and post traumatic lumbar diseases: selection process, results and complications.极端外侧入路治疗退行性和创伤后腰椎疾病:选择过程、结果及并发症
Eur Spine J. 2014 Oct;23 Suppl 6:684-92. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3545-y. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
3
Efficacy of transcranial motor evoked potentials, mechanically elicited electromyography, and evoked electromyography to assess nerve root function during sustained compression in a porcine model.
俯卧经腰大肌腰椎椎间融合术治疗椎间盘退变疾病
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025 Jan 21;15(1). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00090. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.
4
Prone Lateral Transpsoas Approach to the Spine: A Technical Guide for Mastery.俯卧位经腰大肌外侧入路治疗脊柱疾病:精通指南
Int J Spine Surg. 2025 Feb 24;19(S1):S19-S27. doi: 10.14444/8712.
5
Lateral Transpsoas Interbody Fusion.腰大肌外侧椎间融合术
Int J Spine Surg. 2025 Feb 24;19(S1):S7-S18. doi: 10.14444/8711.
6
Incidence and Risk Factors for Lumbar Sympathetic Chain Injury After Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion.斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术后腰交感神经链损伤的发生率及危险因素
Neurospine. 2024 Sep;21(3):820-832. doi: 10.14245/ns.2448536.268. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
7
The change in lumbar lordosis from the standing to the lateral position: implications for lateral interbody fusion.从站立位到侧卧位时腰椎前凸的变化:对侧方椎间融合的影响
Eur Spine J. 2025 Jan;34(1):148-155. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08493-2. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
8
Quantitative Threshold of Intraoperative Radiological Parameters for Suspecting Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage Malposition Triggering Contralateral Radiculopathy.怀疑斜外侧腰椎椎间融合器位置异常引发对侧神经根病的术中放射学参数定量阈值
Int J Spine Surg. 2024 Nov 8;18(5):521-532. doi: 10.14444/8617.
9
The Evolution of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Journey from Past to Present.腰椎侧路椎间融合术的演变:从过去到现在。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Feb 23;60(3):378. doi: 10.3390/medicina60030378.
10
Management of Refractory Post-operative Osteomyelitis and Discitis: A Case Report.难治性术后骨髓炎和椎间盘炎的治疗:病例报告
Cureus. 2024 Jan 20;16(1):e52620. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52620. eCollection 2024 Jan.
在猪模型中持续压迫期间,经颅运动诱发电位、机械诱发肌电图和诱发肌电图评估神经根功能的疗效。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Aug 1;39(17):E989-93. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000442.
4
Postoperative lumbar plexus injury after lumbar retroperitoneal transpsoas minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion.后路腹膜后经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后腰丛神经损伤。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jan 1;38(1):E13-20. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318278417c.
5
Economics of less invasive spinal surgery: an analysis of hospital cost differences between open and minimally invasive instrumented spinal fusion procedures during the perioperative period.微创脊柱手术的经济学:围手术期开放与微创脊柱融合手术的医院成本差异分析。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2012;5:65-74. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S30974. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
6
Direct lateral access lumbar and thoracolumbar fusion: preliminary results.直接外侧入路腰椎和胸腰椎融合术:初步结果。
Eur Spine J. 2012 May;21 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S37-42. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2217-z. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
7
A comparison of perioperative charges and outcome between open and mini-open approaches for anterior lumbar discectomy and fusion.开放式和微创式前路腰椎间盘切除融合术的围手术期费用和结果比较。
J Clin Neurosci. 2012 May;19(5):673-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.09.010. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
8
Lumbar plexus anatomy within the psoas muscle: implications for the transpsoas lateral approach to the L4-L5 disc.腰丛在腰大肌内的解剖结构:对 L4-L5 椎间盘经腰大肌侧方入路的影响。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Aug 17;93(16):1482-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00962.
9
Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion and transpsoas approach-related morbidity.微创侧方腰椎椎间融合术和经椎间孔入路相关的发病率。
Neurosurg Focus. 2011 Oct;31(4):E4. doi: 10.3171/2011.7.FOCUS11137.
10
Minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach with advanced neurophysiologic monitoring for lumbar interbody fusion.采用先进神经生理监测的微创经腰大肌外侧入路用于腰椎椎间融合术。
Eur Spine J. 2011 Sep;20(9):1584-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1997-x.