• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人手术系统对子宫切除术趋势的影响。

Impact of a robotic surgical system on hysterectomy trends.

作者信息

Wasson Megan N, Hoffman Matthew K

出版信息

Del Med J. 2015 Feb;87(2):45-50.

PMID:25876290
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of introduction of a robotic surgical system on hysterectomy trends.

METHODS

A retrospective, cohort study using longitudinal medical records from a tertiary care community hospital was used to determine the surgical approach to hysterectomy. For the purposes of analysis, surgical approaches were categorized as robotically assisted, laparoscopic, laparotomy, vaginal, or laparoscopically assisted vaginal.

RESULTS

A total of 4,440 women underwent a hysterectomy between January 2007 and December 2012 (benign gynecology N = 3,127, gynecologic oncology N = 1,001, urogynecology N = 312). Amongst benign gynecologists, during the five years following introduction of the robotic system, the rate of hysterectomy performed via laparotomy decreased from 62.2 percent to 39.1 percent, p-value < 0.001. The rate of robotically assisted hysterectomy increased from 0.0 percent to 26.4 percent, p-value < 0.001. When subspecialties were examined, the rate of hysterectomy performed by a gynecologic oncologist via laparotomy decreased from 89.7 percent to 20.0 percent, p-value < 0.001. The rate of robotically assisted hysterectomy increased from 0.0 percent to 78.3 percent, p-value < 0.001. Amongst urogynecologists, the rate of hysterectomy performed vaginally decreased from 80.0 percent to 33.6 percent, p-value < 0.001, while the rate of robotically assisted hysterectomy increased from 0.0 percent to 54.2 percent, p-value < 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

The percentage of robotically assisted hysterectomies has dramatically increased and is now the primary modality for performing hysterectomy amongst subspecialists.

摘要

目的

确定引入机器人手术系统对子宫切除术趋势的影响。

方法

采用一项回顾性队列研究,利用一家三级医疗社区医院的纵向医疗记录来确定子宫切除术的手术方式。为进行分析,手术方式分为机器人辅助、腹腔镜、剖腹手术、阴道手术或腹腔镜辅助阴道手术。

结果

2007年1月至2012年12月期间,共有4440名女性接受了子宫切除术(良性妇科疾病患者3127例,妇科肿瘤患者1001例,泌尿妇科患者312例)。在良性妇科手术中,引入机器人系统后的五年间,剖腹手术子宫切除术的比例从62.2%降至39.1%,p值<0.001。机器人辅助子宫切除术的比例从0.0%增至26.4%,p值<0.001。在对各亚专业进行检查时,妇科肿瘤医生进行的剖腹手术子宫切除术比例从89.7%降至20.0%,p值<0.001。机器人辅助子宫切除术的比例从0.0%增至78.3%,p值<0.001。在泌尿妇科医生中,经阴道子宫切除术的比例从80.0%降至33.6%,p值<0.001,而机器人辅助子宫切除术的比例从0.0%增至54.2%,p值<0.001。

结论

机器人辅助子宫切除术的比例显著增加,现已成为各亚专业进行子宫切除术的主要方式。

相似文献

1
Impact of a robotic surgical system on hysterectomy trends.机器人手术系统对子宫切除术趋势的影响。
Del Med J. 2015 Feb;87(2):45-50.
2
A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.全腹腔镜子宫切除术与机器人辅助子宫切除术的比较:社区实践中的手术结果
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):286-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
3
Effect of robotic surgery on hysterectomy trends: implications for resident education.机器人手术对子宫切除术趋势的影响:对住院医师教育的启示。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):399-405. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.10.009. Epub 2013 Oct 27.
4
Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.机器人辅助与腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗良性妇科疾病的比较。
JAMA. 2013 Feb 20;309(7):689-98. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.186.
5
Surgical Trends and Time Frame Comparison of Surgical Types of Hysterectomy: A Nationwide, Population-based 15-year Study.手术趋势和子宫切除术手术类型的时间框架比较:一项全国范围内基于人群的 15 年研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Jan;27(1):65-73.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.02.020. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
6
Changing hysterectomy patterns after introduction of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术后子宫切除模式的变化
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Aug;171(2):340-3; discussion 343-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70032-x.
7
Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a university hospital. Decreasing the need for abdominal hysterectomy and increasing resident experience in vaginal surgery.大学医院中的腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术。减少腹部子宫切除术的需求并增加住院医师在阴道手术方面的经验。
J Reprod Med. 1996 Jul;41(7):497-503.
8
A comparison of quality outcome measures in patients having a hysterectomy for benign disease: robotic vs. non-robotic approaches.良性疾病子宫切除术患者质量结局指标的比较:机器人手术与非机器人手术方法
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):389-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.10.008. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
9
Inpatient Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in the United States: Trends and Factors Associated With Approach Selection.美国住院患者腹腔镜子宫切除术:手术方式选择的趋势及相关因素
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Jan 1;24(1):151-158.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.830. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
10
Hysterectomy on benign indications in Sweden 1987-2003: a nationwide trend analysis.1987 - 2003年瑞典良性指征子宫切除术:一项全国性趋势分析。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(1):52-8. doi: 10.1080/00016340802596017.