• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

辅助生殖技术与先天性畸形风险:一项基于队列研究的荟萃分析

Assisted reproductive technology and risk of congenital malformations: a meta-analysis based on cohort studies.

作者信息

Qin Jiabi, Sheng Xiaoqi, Wang Hua, Liang Desheng, Tan Hongzhuan, Xia Jiahui

机构信息

Division of Medical Genetics, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hunan Province, 53 Xiangchun Road, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China,

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Oct;292(4):777-98. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3707-0. Epub 2015 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1007/s00404-015-3707-0
PMID:25877221
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the association between assisted reproductive technology (ART) and risk of congenital malformations (CM) by conducting a meta-analysis of cohort studies.

METHODS

PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Libraries and Chinese database were searched through August 2014 to identify studies that met pre-stated inclusion criteria. Either a fixed- or a random-effects model was used to calculate the overall combined risk estimates. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore potential heterogeneity moderators.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven studies involving 119,874 infants conceived following ART and 1,212,320 infants conceived naturally were included in the analysis. The ART-conceived infants were associated with a higher risk of CM [relative risk (RR) = 1.33; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.24-1.43] when compared with those conceived naturally. When data were restricted to singleton births (RR = 1.38; 95 % CI 1.30-1.47), major CM (RR = 1.47; 95 % CI 1.29-1.68), matched/adjusted studies (RR = 1.37; 95 % CI 1.27-1.47) or high quality studies (RR = 1.40; 95 % CI 1.27-1.55), the increased risk of CM still existed in ART pregnancies. Additionally, an increased risk of CM was also found when the ART twin (RR = 1.18; 95 % CI 1.06-1.32) or multiple births (RR = 1.16; 95 % CI 1.05-1.27) were separately compared with spontaneously conceived twin or multiple births. Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies (I (2) = 68, 44, 39, and 33 % for all infants, singletons, twins and multiples, respectively). Whether confounding factors were matched or adjusted, study quality and sample size as the first three of the most relevant heterogeneity moderators have been identified. No evidence of publication bias was observed (P > 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

The ART-conceived infants have a higher risk of CM compared with those conceived naturally. However, these estimates have to be viewed with caution because of heterogeneity.

摘要

目的

通过对队列研究进行荟萃分析,评估辅助生殖技术(ART)与先天性畸形(CM)风险之间的关联。

方法

检索截至2014年8月的PubMed、谷歌学术、Cochrane图书馆和中文数据库,以确定符合预先设定纳入标准的研究。采用固定效应模型或随机效应模型计算总体合并风险估计值。进行亚组分析以探索潜在的异质性调节因素。

结果

分析纳入了57项研究,其中119874名婴儿通过ART受孕,1212320名婴儿自然受孕。与自然受孕的婴儿相比,ART受孕的婴儿患CM的风险更高[相对风险(RR)=1.33;95%置信区间(CI)1.24 - 1.43]。当数据仅限于单胎分娩(RR = 1.38;95% CI 1.30 - 1.47)、主要CM(RR = 1.47;95% CI 1.29 - 1.68)、匹配/调整研究(RR = 1.37;95% CI 1.27 - 1.47)或高质量研究(RR = 1.40;95% CI 1.27 - 1.55)时,ART妊娠中CM风险增加仍然存在。此外,当分别将ART双胎(RR = 1.18;95% CI 1.06 - 1.32)或多胎分娩(RR = 1.16;95% CI 1.05 - 1.27)与自然受孕的双胎或多胎分娩进行比较时,也发现CM风险增加。各研究间观察到显著异质性(所有婴儿、单胎、双胎和多胎的I²分别为68%、44%、39%和33%)。已确定混杂因素是否匹配或调整、研究质量和样本量是最相关的异质性调节因素中的前三位。未观察到发表偏倚的证据(P > 0.10)。

结论

与自然受孕的婴儿相比,ART受孕的婴儿患CM的风险更高。然而,由于存在异质性,这些估计值必须谨慎看待。

相似文献

1
Assisted reproductive technology and risk of congenital malformations: a meta-analysis based on cohort studies.辅助生殖技术与先天性畸形风险:一项基于队列研究的荟萃分析
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Oct;292(4):777-98. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3707-0. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
2
Pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in multiple pregnancies resulting from assisted reproductive technology: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.辅助生殖技术导致的多胎妊娠的妊娠相关并发症和不良妊娠结局:队列研究的荟萃分析。
Fertil Steril. 2015 Jun;103(6):1492-508.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.018. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
3
Assisted reproductive technology and risk of adverse obstetric outcomes in dichorionic twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.双绒毛膜双胎妊娠中辅助生殖技术与不良产科结局风险:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Fertil Steril. 2016 May;105(5):1180-1192. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.131. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
4
Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.辅助生殖技术与单胎妊娠相关并发症和不良妊娠结局风险的关系:队列研究的荟萃分析。
Fertil Steril. 2016 Jan;105(1):73-85.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
5
Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.辅助生殖技术监测——美国,2011 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Nov 21;63(10):1-28.
6
Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.辅助生殖技术监测—美国,2012 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Aug 14;64(6):1-29.
7
Congenital malformations in infants conceived following assisted reproductive technology in comparison with spontaneously conceived infants.与自然受孕婴儿相比,辅助生殖技术受孕婴儿的先天性畸形情况。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013 Aug;26(12):1171-9. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.776535. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
8
Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - 
United States, 2013.辅助生殖技术监测报告——美国,2013 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Dec 4;64(11):1-25. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6411a1.
9
Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.辅助生殖技术与出生缺陷:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Hum Reprod Update. 2013 Jul-Aug;19(4):330-53. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt006. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
10
Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010.辅助生殖技术监测--美国,2010 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2013 Dec 6;62(9):1-24.

引用本文的文献

1
Does assisted reproductive technology influence the complexity and associated malformations in esophageal atresia?辅助生殖技术会影响食管闭锁的复杂性及相关畸形吗?
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Sep 11. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03624-0.
2
The impact of assisted reproductive technologies versus natural conception on neonatal intensive care unit admission: A retrospective cohort analysis.辅助生殖技术与自然受孕对新生儿重症监护病房收治情况的影响:一项回顾性队列分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 2;20(9):e0329943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329943. eCollection 2025.
3
Congenital anomalies observed in children conceived through assisted reproductive technology-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
通过辅助生殖技术受孕的儿童中观察到的先天性异常——一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Mar 31. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03454-0.
4
Perinatal outcomes of selective termination in dichorionic twin pregnancies: a retrospective study from a single center.双绒毛膜双胎妊娠选择性减胎术的围产期结局:一项来自单一中心的回顾性研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Mar;311(3):649-659. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07784-9. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
5
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of dichorionic twin pregnancies achieved with assisted reproductive technology: meta-analysis of contemporary data.辅助生殖技术实现的双绒毛膜双胎妊娠的母儿结局:当代数据的荟萃分析
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Mar;41(3):581-589. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03035-7. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
6
The effect of fertility treatment and socioeconomic status on neonatal and post-neonatal mortality in the United States.生育治疗和社会经济地位对美国新生儿及新生儿后期死亡率的影响。
J Perinatol. 2024 Feb;44(2):187-194. doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-01866-x. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
7
Cumulative live birth rate and neonatal outcomes after early rescue ICSI: a propensity score matching analysis.早期挽救性卵胞浆内单精子注射后的累积活产率及新生儿结局:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Hum Reprod Open. 2023 Nov 23;2023(4):hoad046. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoad046. eCollection 2023.
8
Frequency, morbidity and equity - the case for increased research on male fertility.频率、发病率和公平性——增加男性生育力研究的理由。
Nat Rev Urol. 2024 Feb;21(2):102-124. doi: 10.1038/s41585-023-00820-4. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
9
Birth prevalence of genital anomalies among males conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: A cross-sectional study.卵胞浆内单精子注射周期受孕男性生殖器异常的出生患病率:一项横断面研究。
Int J Reprod Biomed. 2023 Feb 8;21(1):53-60. doi: 10.18502/ijrm.v21i1.12666. eCollection 2023 Jan.
10
The longer-term effects of IVF on offspring from childhood to adolescence.体外受精对后代从童年到青春期的长期影响。
Front Reprod Health. 2022 Dec 8;4:1045762. doi: 10.3389/frph.2022.1045762. eCollection 2022.