French Jacqueline A, Gil-Nagel Antonio, Malerba Stefano, Kramer Lynn, Kumar Dinesh, Bagiella Emilia
From the NYU Comprehensive Epilepsy Center (J.A.F.), New York; Hospital Ruber Internacional (A.G.-N.), Madrid, Spain; Mount Sinai Hospital (S.M., E.B.), New York; and the Eisai Neuroscience Product Creation Unit (L.K., D.K.), Woodcliff Lake, NJ.
Neurology. 2015 May 19;84(20):2014-20. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001585. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
To determine whether a novel endpoint of time to prerandomization monthly seizure count could be used to differentiate efficacious and nonefficacious therapies in clinical trials of new add-on antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).
This analysis used data from 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trials of perampanel as an add-on therapy in patients with epilepsy who were experiencing refractory partial seizures: studies 304 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00699972), 305 (NCT00699582), and 306 (NCT00700310). Time to prerandomization monthly seizure count was evaluated post hoc for each trial, and findings were compared with the original primary outcomes (median percent change in seizure frequency and 50% responder rate). Outcomes were assessed for all partial-onset seizures, secondarily generalized (SG) tonic-clonic seizures only, and complex partial plus SG (CP + SG) seizures.
Perampanel 4-12 mg significantly prolonged median time to prerandomization monthly seizure count, generally by more than 1 week, compared with placebo, across all 3 studies, consistent with the original primary outcomes. Analysis of SG seizures only, and CP + SG seizures, also indicated a significantly prolonged median time to prerandomization monthly seizure count with perampanel 8 mg and 12 mg compared with placebo.
Time to prerandomization monthly seizure count is a promising novel alternative to the standard endpoints of median percent change in seizure frequency and 50% responder rates used in trials of add-on AEDs. Use of this endpoint could reduce exposure to placebo or ineffective treatments, thereby facilitating trial recruitment and improving safety.
确定在新型添加抗癫痫药物(AEDs)的临床试验中,预随机分组时每月癫痫发作次数这一新的终点指标是否可用于区分有效和无效治疗。
本分析使用了三项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的III期试验数据,这些试验将吡仑帕奈作为难治性部分性癫痫患者的添加疗法:研究304(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT00699972)、305(NCT00699582)和306(NCT00700310)。对每项试验事后评估预随机分组时每月癫痫发作次数的时间,并将结果与原始主要结局(癫痫发作频率的中位数变化百分比和50%缓解率)进行比较。对所有部分性发作、仅继发全面性(SG)强直阵挛发作以及复杂部分性加SG(CP + SG)发作的结局进行评估。
在所有三项研究中,与安慰剂相比,4 - 12 mg的吡仑帕奈显著延长了预随机分组时每月癫痫发作次数的中位数时间,通常延长超过1周,这与原始主要结局一致。仅对SG发作和CP + SG发作的分析也表明,与安慰剂相比,8 mg和12 mg的吡仑帕奈显著延长了预随机分组时每月癫痫发作次数的中位数时间。
预随机分组时每月癫痫发作次数的时间是添加AEDs试验中癫痫发作频率中位数变化百分比和50%缓解率等标准终点指标的一个有前景的新替代指标。使用该终点指标可减少安慰剂或无效治疗的暴露,从而促进试验招募并提高安全性。