Kriechbaumer Sandra R P, Jurina Konrad, Wielaender Franziska, Schenk Henning C, Steinberg Tanja A, Reese Sven, Buhmann Gesine, Doerfelt Stefanie, Potschka Heidrun, Fischer Andrea
Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Clinic of Small Animal Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
AniCura Small Animal Clinic Haar, Haar, Germany.
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Jul 6;9:910038. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.910038. eCollection 2022.
Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder affecting 0.6-0.75% of dogs in veterinary practice. Treatment is frequently complicated by the occurrence of drug-resistant epilepsy and cluster seizures in dogs with idiopathic epilepsy. Only few studies are available to guide treatment choices beyond licensed veterinary drugs. The aim of the study was to compare antiseizure efficacy and tolerability of two add-on treatment strategies in dogs with drug-resistant idiopathic epilepsy. The study design was a prospective, open-label, non-blinded, comparative treatment trial. Treatment success was defined as a 3-fold extension of the longest baseline interseizure interval and to a minimum of 3 months. To avoid prolonged adherence to a presumably ineffective treatment strategy, dog owners could leave the study after the third day with generalized seizures if the interseizure interval failed to show a relevant increase. Twenty-six dogs (mean age 5.5 years, mean seizure frequency 4/month) with drug-resistant idiopathic epilepsy and a history of cluster seizures were included. Dogs received either add-on treatment with pregabalin (PGB) 4 mg/kg twice daily (14 dogs) or a dose increase in levetiracetam (LEV) add-on treatment (12 dogs). Thirteen dogs in the PGB group had drug levels within the therapeutic range for humans. Two dogs in the PGB group (14.3%; 2/14) and one dog in the LEV group (8.3%; 1/12) achieved treatment success with long seizure-free intervals from 122 to 219 days but then relapsed to their early seizure frequency 10 months after the study inclusion. The overall low success rates with both treatment strategies likely reflect a real-life situation in canine drug-resistant idiopathic epilepsy in everyday veterinary practice. These results delineate the need for research on better pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatment strategies in dogs with drug-resistant epilepsy.
癫痫是一种常见的神经系统疾病,在兽医临床中影响着0.6 - 0.75%的犬类。特发性癫痫犬出现耐药性癫痫和丛集性发作常常使治疗变得复杂。除了已获许可的兽药外,仅有少数研究可指导治疗选择。本研究的目的是比较两种附加治疗策略对耐药性特发性癫痫犬的抗癫痫疗效和耐受性。研究设计为前瞻性、开放标签、非盲法的对照治疗试验。治疗成功定义为最长基线发作间期延长3倍且至少达到3个月。为避免长期采用可能无效的治疗策略,如果发作间期未显示出明显延长,犬主人可在出现全身性发作的第三天后让犬退出研究。纳入了26只患有耐药性特发性癫痫且有丛集性发作病史的犬(平均年龄5.5岁,平均发作频率4次/月)。犬只接受以下治疗之一:每日两次加用4 mg/kg普瑞巴林(PGB)(14只犬)或增加左乙拉西坦(LEV)附加治疗剂量(12只犬)。PGB组有13只犬的药物水平处于人类治疗范围内。PGB组有2只犬(14.3%;2/14)和LEV组有1只犬(8.3%;1/12)治疗成功,无发作间期长达122至219天,但在纳入研究10个月后又恢复到早期发作频率。两种治疗策略总体成功率较低,这可能反映了日常兽医临床中犬类耐药性特发性癫痫的实际情况。这些结果表明需要对耐药性癫痫犬更好的药物和非药物治疗策略进行研究。