1 School of Communication, University of Nebraska at Omaha , Omaha, Nebraska.
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2015 Apr;18(4):208-13. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0443.
New media technologies make it necessary for scholars to reassess mass communication theories developed among legacy media. One such theory is the spiral of silence theory originally proposed by Noelle-Neumann in the 1970s. Increasing diversity of media content, selectivity, social networking site (SNS) interactivity, and the potential for anonymity have posed various challenges to its theoretical assumptions. While application of the spiral of silence in SNS contexts has been theorized, its empirical testing is scarce. To fill this void, the Pew 2012 Search, Social Networks, and Politics survey is used to test the theory. Results reveal that encountering agreeable political content predicts speaking out, while encountering disagreeable postings stifles opinion expression, supporting the spiral of silence theory in the SNS environment. However, certain uses of SNSs and psychological factors demonstrate a liberating effect on opinion expression.
新媒体技术使得学者们有必要重新评估在传统媒体中发展起来的大众传播理论。沉默的螺旋理论就是这样一种理论,它最初是由诺依曼在 20 世纪 70 年代提出的。媒体内容的日益多样化、选择性、社交网站的互动性以及匿名的可能性,对其理论假设提出了各种挑战。虽然已经有人对沉默的螺旋在社交网站环境中的应用进行了理论上的探讨,但对其进行实证检验的却很少。为了填补这一空白,本文利用皮尤 2012 年的搜索、社交网络和政治调查来检验这一理论。研究结果表明,遇到赞同的政治内容会促进言论的表达,而遇到不同意的帖子则会抑制意见的表达,这支持了在社交网络环境中的沉默的螺旋理论。然而,社交网站的某些用途和心理因素对意见表达起到了解放作用。