Nolasco Andreu, Moncho Joaquin, Quesada Jose Antonio, Melchor Inmaculada, Pereyra-Zamora Pamela, Tamayo-Fonseca Nayara, Martínez-Beneito Miguel Angel, Zurriaga Oscar, Ballesta Mónica, Daponte Antonio, Gandarillas Ana, Domínguez-Berjón M Felicitas, Marí-Dell'Olmo Marc, Gotsens Mercè, Izco Natividad, Moreno M Concepción, Sáez Marc, Martos Carmen, Sánchez-Villegas Pablo, Borrell Carme
Unidad de Investigación de Análisis de la Mortalidad y Estadísticas Sanitarias. Departamento de Enfermería Comunitaria, Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública e Historia de la Ciencia. Campus de San Vicente del Raspeig s/n. Apartado 99, Universidad de Alicante, 03080, Alicante, España.
Registro de Mortalidad de la Comunidad Valenciana, Servicio de Estudios Epidemiológicos y Estadísticas Sanitarias, Subdirección General de Epidemiología y Vigilancia de la Salud. Conselleria de Sanitat, Plaza de España 6, 03010, Alicante, España.
Int J Equity Health. 2015 Apr 1;14:33. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0164-0.
Preventable mortality is a good indicator of possible problems to be investigated in the primary prevention chain, making it also a useful tool with which to evaluate health policies particularly public health policies. This study describes inequalities in preventable avoidable mortality in relation to socioeconomic status in small urban areas of thirty three Spanish cities, and analyses their evolution over the course of the periods 1996-2001 and 2002-2007.
We analysed census tracts and all deaths occurring in the population residing in these cities from 1996 to 2007 were taken into account. The causes included in the study were lung cancer, cirrhosis, AIDS/HIV, motor vehicle traffic accidents injuries, suicide and homicide. The census tracts were classified into three groups, according their socioeconomic level. To analyse inequalities in mortality risks between the highest and lowest socioeconomic levels and over different periods, for each city and separating by sex, Poisson regression were used.
Preventable avoidable mortality made a significant contribution to general mortality (around 7.5%, higher among men), having decreased over time in men (12.7 in 1996-2001 and 10.9 in 2002-2007), though not so clearly among women (3.3% in 1996-2001 and 2.9% in 2002-2007). It has been observed in men that the risks of death are higher in areas of greater deprivation, and that these excesses have not modified over time. The result in women is different and differences in mortality risks by socioeconomic level could not be established in many cities.
Preventable mortality decreased between the 1996-2001 and 2002-2007 periods, more markedly in men than in women. There were socioeconomic inequalities in mortality in most cities analysed, associating a higher risk of death with higher levels of deprivation. Inequalities have remained over the two periods analysed. This study makes it possible to identify those areas where excess preventable mortality was associated with more deprived zones. It is in these deprived zones where actions to reduce and monitor health inequalities should be put into place. Primary healthcare may play an important role in this process.
可预防死亡率是初级预防链中有待调查的潜在问题的良好指标,也是评估卫生政策尤其是公共卫生政策的有用工具。本研究描述了西班牙33个城市的小城区中可预防的可避免死亡率与社会经济地位之间的不平等情况,并分析了1996 - 2001年和2002 - 2007年期间其变化情况。
我们分析了普查区,并纳入了1996年至2007年居住在这些城市的人口中的所有死亡病例。研究涵盖的死因包括肺癌、肝硬化、艾滋病/艾滋病毒、机动车交通事故伤害、自杀和他杀。根据社会经济水平,普查区分成三组。为分析最高和最低社会经济水平之间以及不同时期的死亡率风险不平等情况,对每个城市并按性别分别使用泊松回归分析。
可预防的可避免死亡率对总死亡率有显著贡献(约7.5%,男性中更高),男性死亡率随时间下降(1996 - 2001年为12.7%,2002 - 2007年为10.9%),但女性中下降不太明显(1996 - 2001年为3.3%,2002 - 2007年为2.9%)。在男性中观察到,贫困程度较高地区的死亡风险更高,且这些超额风险随时间未发生变化。女性的结果不同,在许多城市无法确定社会经济水平导致的死亡率风险差异。
1996 - 2001年至2002 - 2007年期间可预防死亡率下降,男性比女性更明显。在大多数分析的城市中,死亡率存在社会经济不平等,死亡风险较高与贫困程度较高相关。在分析的两个时期内不平等现象持续存在。本研究使得能够确定那些可预防死亡率过高与更贫困地区相关的区域。正是在这些贫困地区应采取减少和监测健康不平等的行动。初级医疗保健可能在这一过程中发挥重要作用。