• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

集中制裁能否促进社会困境中的信任?一个具有不完全信息的两级信任博弈。

Can centralized sanctioning promote trust in social dilemmas? A two-level trust game with incomplete information.

作者信息

Wang Raymond Yu, Ng Cho Nam

机构信息

Faculty of Social Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Department of Geography, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Apr 16;10(4):e0124513. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124513. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0124513
PMID:25879752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4400067/
Abstract

The problem of trust is a paradigmatic social dilemma. Previous literature has paid much academic attention on effects of peer punishment and altruistic third-party punishment on trust and human cooperation in dyadic interactions. However, the effects of centralized sanctioning institutions on decentralized reciprocity in hierarchical interactions remain to be further explored. This paper presents a formal two-level trust game with incomplete information which adds an authority as a strategic purposive actor into the traditional trust game. This model allows scholars to examine the problem of trust in more complex game theoretic configurations. The analysis demonstrates how the centralized institutions might change the dynamics of reciprocity between the trustor and the trustee. Findings suggest that the sequential equilibria of the newly proposed two-level model simultaneously include the risk of placing trust for the trustor and the temptation of short-term defection for the trustee. Moreover, they have shown that even a slight uncertainty about the type of the newly introduced authority might facilitate the establishment of trust and reciprocity in social dilemmas.

摘要

信任问题是一个典型的社会困境。以往文献在二元互动中,对同伴惩罚和利他第三方惩罚对信任及人类合作的影响给予了大量学术关注。然而,中央制裁机构对等级互动中分散互惠的影响仍有待进一步探索。本文提出了一个具有不完全信息的正式两级信任博弈,该博弈在传统信任博弈中增加了一个作为战略目标行为体的权威。这个模型使学者们能够在更复杂的博弈论框架中研究信任问题。分析表明了中央机构可能如何改变信任者与受托者之间的互惠动态。研究结果表明,新提出的两级模型的序列均衡同时包括信任者信任的风险和受托者短期背叛的诱惑。此外,研究表明,即使新引入的权威类型存在轻微不确定性,也可能促进社会困境中信任和互惠的建立。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1ae/4400067/fdb086eb3eab/pone.0124513.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1ae/4400067/c9db6a6b593c/pone.0124513.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1ae/4400067/14c7749b3010/pone.0124513.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1ae/4400067/fdb086eb3eab/pone.0124513.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1ae/4400067/c9db6a6b593c/pone.0124513.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1ae/4400067/14c7749b3010/pone.0124513.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1ae/4400067/fdb086eb3eab/pone.0124513.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Can centralized sanctioning promote trust in social dilemmas? A two-level trust game with incomplete information.集中制裁能否促进社会困境中的信任?一个具有不完全信息的两级信任博弈。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 16;10(4):e0124513. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124513. eCollection 2015.
2
Centralized sanctioning and legitimate authority promote cooperation in humans.集中制裁和合法权威促进了人类的合作。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jul 5;108(27):11023-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1105456108. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
3
When is altruistic punishment useful in social dilemmas?在社会困境中,利他惩罚何时有用?
Biosystems. 2018 Dec;174:60-62. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2018.10.015. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
4
Punitive preferences, monetary incentives and tacit coordination in the punishment of defectors promote cooperation in humans.惩罚背叛者时的惩罚性偏好、金钱激励和默契协调促进了人类的合作。
Sci Rep. 2015 May 19;5:10321. doi: 10.1038/srep10321.
5
Direct reciprocity with costly punishment: generous tit-for-tat prevails.带有代价高昂惩罚的直接互惠:慷慨的以牙还牙策略占上风。
J Theor Biol. 2009 Jan 7;256(1):45-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.09.015. Epub 2008 Oct 2.
6
Promote or hinder? The role of punishment in the emergence of cooperation.促进还是阻碍?惩罚在合作出现过程中的作用。
J Theor Biol. 2015 Dec 7;386:69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.09.009. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
7
Indirect reciprocity in three types of social dilemmas.三种社会困境中的间接互惠
J Theor Biol. 2014 Aug 21;355:117-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.03.035. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
8
Towards a unified theory of reciprocity.走向互惠的统一理论。
Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Feb;35(1):36-7. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11001312.
9
Which is the ideal sanction for cooperation? An experimental study on different types of third-party sanctions.哪种制裁方式最有利于促进合作?一项关于不同类型第三方制裁的实验研究。
Psych J. 2019 Jun;8(2):212-231. doi: 10.1002/pchj.259. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
10
Motivations to reciprocate cooperation and punish defection are calibrated by estimates of how easily others can switch partners.对合作进行回报和惩罚背叛行为的动机,是根据对他人更换合作伙伴的难易程度的估计来校准的。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 19;17(4):e0267153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267153. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Gratitude enhances widespread dynamic cooperation and inter-brain synchronization in females.感恩增强了女性广泛的动态合作和脑间同步。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2025 Mar 29;20(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaf023.

本文引用的文献

1
Joint effects of asymmetric payoff and reciprocity mechanisms on collective cooperation in water sharing interactions: a game theoretic perspective.非对称报酬与互惠机制对水资源共享互动中集体合作的联合影响:博弈论视角。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 28;8(8):e73793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073793. eCollection 2013.
2
Do humans really punish altruistically? A closer look.人类真的会利他惩罚吗?进一步观察。
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Mar 6;280(1758):20122723. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2723. Print 2013 May 7.
3
An economic experiment reveals that humans prefer pool punishment to maintain the commons.
一项经济实验表明,人类更倾向于采用集体惩罚来维护公共资源。
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Sep 22;279(1743):3716-21. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.0937. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
4
Centralized sanctioning and legitimate authority promote cooperation in humans.集中制裁和合法权威促进了人类的合作。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jul 5;108(27):11023-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1105456108. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
5
Social learning promotes institutions for governing the commons.社会学习促进了对公共资源进行管理的制度的形成。
Nature. 2010 Aug 12;466(7308):861-3. doi: 10.1038/nature09203. Epub 2010 Jul 14.
6
Coordinated punishment of defectors sustains cooperation and can proliferate when rare.当稀有资源发生背叛时,协调惩罚背叛者可以维持合作,并使其扩散。
Science. 2010 Apr 30;328(5978):617-20. doi: 10.1126/science.1183665.
7
The long-run benefits of punishment.惩罚的长期益处。
Science. 2008 Dec 5;322(5907):1510. doi: 10.1126/science.1164744.
8
Constraining free riding in public goods games: designated solitary punishers can sustain human cooperation.抑制公共物品博弈中的搭便车行为:指定的单独惩罚者能够维持人类合作。
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jan 22;276(1655):323-9. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1082.
9
Via freedom to coercion: the emergence of costly punishment.从自由到强制:代价高昂的惩罚的出现。
Science. 2007 Jun 29;316(5833):1905-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1141588.
10
The efficient interaction of indirect reciprocity and costly punishment.间接互惠与代价高昂的惩罚之间的有效互动。
Nature. 2006 Dec 7;444(7120):718-23. doi: 10.1038/nature05229.