Engelmann Jan B, Meyer Friederike, Fehr Ernst, Ruff Christian C
Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research (SNS-Lab), Department of Economics, University of Zurich, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland, and Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University, 6525 HP, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Laboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research (SNS-Lab), Department of Economics, University of Zurich, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland, and
J Neurosci. 2015 Feb 18;35(7):3085-99. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2880-14.2015.
Incidental negative emotions unrelated to the current task, such as background anxiety, can strongly influence decisions. This is most evident in psychiatric disorders associated with generalized emotional disturbances. However, the neural mechanisms by which incidental emotions may affect choices remain poorly understood. Here we study the effects of incidental anxiety on human risky decision making, focusing on both behavioral preferences and their underlying neural processes. Although observable choices remained stable across affective contexts with high and low incidental anxiety, we found a clear change in neural valuation signals: during high incidental anxiety, activity in ventromedial prefrontal cortex and ventral striatum showed a marked reduction in (1) neural coding of the expected subjective value (ESV) of risky options, (2) prediction of observed choices, (3) functional coupling with other areas of the valuation system, and (4) baseline activity. At the same time, activity in the anterior insula showed an increase in coding the negative ESV of risky lotteries, and this neural activity predicted whether the risky lotteries would be rejected. This pattern of results suggests that incidental anxiety can shift the focus of neural valuation from possible positive consequences to anticipated negative consequences of choice options. Moreover, our findings show that these changes in neural value coding can occur in the absence of changes in overt behavior. This suggest a possible pathway by which background anxiety may lead to the development of chronic reward desensitization and a maladaptive focus on negative cognitions, as prevalent in affective and anxiety disorders.
与当前任务无关的偶然负面情绪,如背景焦虑,会强烈影响决策。这在与广泛性情绪障碍相关的精神疾病中最为明显。然而,偶然情绪可能影响选择的神经机制仍知之甚少。在这里,我们研究偶然焦虑对人类风险决策的影响,重点关注行为偏好及其潜在的神经过程。尽管在高偶然焦虑和低偶然焦虑的情感背景下,可观察到的选择保持稳定,但我们发现神经估值信号有明显变化:在高偶然焦虑期间,腹内侧前额叶皮层和腹侧纹状体的活动在以下方面显著减少:(1)风险选项的预期主观价值(ESV)的神经编码;(2)对观察到的选择的预测;(3)与估值系统其他区域的功能耦合;(4)基线活动。与此同时,前岛叶的活动在对风险彩票的负ESV进行编码时增加,并且这种神经活动预测了风险彩票是否会被拒绝。这种结果模式表明,偶然焦虑可以将神经估值的焦点从选择选项可能的积极后果转移到预期的消极后果上。此外,我们的研究结果表明,这些神经价值编码的变化可以在明显行为没有变化的情况下发生。这提示了一种可能的途径,通过该途径背景焦虑可能导致慢性奖励脱敏的发展以及对负面认知的适应不良关注,这在情感和焦虑障碍中很普遍。