Quispel Chantal, Schneider Tom A J, Hoogendijk Witte J G, Bonsel Gouke J, Lambregtse-van den Berg Mijke P
Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Obstetrics & Prenatal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Feb 28;15:51. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0480-9.
Mental disorders are prevalent during pregnancy, affecting 10% of women worldwide. To improve triage of a broad spectrum of mental disorders, we investigated the decision impact validity of: 1) a short set of currently used psychiatric triage items, 2) this set with the inclusion of some more specific psychiatric items (intermediate set), 3) this new set with the addition of the 10-item Edinburgh Depression Scale (extended set), and 4) the final set with the addition of common psychosocial co-predictors (comprehensive set).
This was a validation study including 330 urban pregnant women. Women completed a questionnaire including 20 psychiatric and 10 psychosocial items. Psychiatric diagnosis (gold standard) was obtained through Structured Clinical Interviews of DSM-IV axis I and II disorders (SCID-I and II). The outcome measure of our analysis was presence (yes/no) of any current mental disorder. The performance of the short, intermediate, extended, and comprehensive triage models was evaluated by multiple logistic regression analysis, by analysis of the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and through associated performance measures, including, for example, sensitivity, specificity and the number of missed cases.
Diagnostic performance of the short triage model (1) was acceptable (Nagelkerke's R(2)=0.276, AUC=0.740, 48 out of 131 cases were missed). The intermediate model (2) performed better (R(2)=0.547, AUC=0.883, 22 cases were missed) including the five items: ever experienced a traumatic event, ever had feelings of a depressed mood, ever had a panic attack, current psychiatric symptoms and current severe depressive or anxious symptoms. Addition of the 10-item Edinburgh Depression Scale or the three psychosocial items unplanned pregnancy, alcohol consumption and sexual/physical abuse (models 3 and 4) further increased R(2) and AUC (>0.900), with 23 cases missed. Missed cases included pregnant women with a current eating disorder, psychotic disorder and the first onset of anxiety disorders.
For a valid detection of the full spectrum of common mental disorders during pregnancy, at least the intermediate set of five psychiatric items should be implemented in routine obstetric care. For a brief yet comprehensive triage, three high impact psychosocial items should be added as independent contributors.
精神障碍在孕期很常见,全球10%的女性受其影响。为改善对广泛精神障碍的分诊,我们调查了以下几种情况的决策影响效度:1)一组目前使用的简短精神科分诊项目;2)包含一些更具体精神科项目的该组项目(中间组);3)在新组项目基础上增加10项爱丁堡抑郁量表的情况(扩展组);4)在最终组项目基础上增加常见心理社会共同预测因素的情况(综合组)。
这是一项纳入330名城市孕妇的验证性研究。孕妇完成了一份包含20项精神科和10项心理社会项目的问卷。通过对DSM-IV轴I和II障碍的结构化临床访谈(SCID-I和II)获得精神科诊断(金标准)。我们分析的结果指标是当前是否存在任何精神障碍。通过多因素逻辑回归分析、ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分析以及相关性能指标(包括敏感性、特异性和漏诊病例数等)评估简短、中间、扩展和综合分诊模型的性能。
简短分诊模型(1)的诊断性能尚可(Nagelkerke's R² = 0.276,AUC = 0.740,131例中有48例漏诊)。中间模型(2)表现更好(R² = 0.547,AUC = 0.883,22例漏诊),该模型包含以下五个项目:曾经历创伤性事件、曾有情绪低落感、曾有惊恐发作、当前精神科症状以及当前严重抑郁或焦虑症状。增加10项爱丁堡抑郁量表或三个心理社会项目(意外怀孕、饮酒以及性/身体虐待,模型3和4)进一步提高了R²和AUC(>0.900),漏诊23例。漏诊病例包括当前患有饮食失调、精神障碍以及首次发作焦虑症的孕妇。
为有效检测孕期常见精神障碍的全貌,常规产科护理中至少应采用包含五个精神科项目的中间组。为进行简短而全面的分诊,应添加三个具有高影响力的心理社会项目作为独立因素。