De Geer Lina, Oscarsson Anna, Engvall Jan
Department of Intensive Care and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Physiology and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2015 Apr 15;13:19. doi: 10.1186/s12947-015-0015-6.
Echocardiography is increasingly used for haemodynamic evaluation and titration of therapy in intensive care, warranting reliable and reproducible measurements. The aim of this study was to evaluate the observer dependence of echocardiographic findings of left ventricular (LV) diastolic and systolic dysfunction in patients with septic shock.
Echocardiograms performed in 47 adult patients admitted with septic shock to a general intensive care unit (ICU) were independently evaluated by one cardiologist and one intensivist for the following signs: decreased diastolic tissue velocity of the base of the LV septum (é), increased early mitral inflow (E) to é ratio (E/é), decreased LV ejection fraction (EF) and decreased LV global longitudinal peak strain (GLPS). Diastolic dysfunction was defined as é <8.0 cm/s and/or E/é ≥15 and systolic dysfunction as EF <50% and/or GLPS > -15%. Ten randomly selected examinations were re-analysed two months later. Pearson's r was used to test the correlation and Bland-Altman plots to assess the agreement between observers. Kappa statistics were used to test the consistency between readers and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for inter- and intraobserver variability.
In 44 patients (94%), image quality was sufficient for echocardiographic measurements. The agreement between observers was moderate (k = 0.60 for é, k = 0.50 for E/é and k = 0.60 for EF) to good (k = 0.71 for GLPS). Pearson's r was 0.76 for é, 0.85 for E/é, 0.78 for EF and 0.84 for GLPS (p < 0.001 for all four). The ICC between observers for é was very good (0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-0.92), good for E/é (0.70; 95% CI 0.45 - 0.84), very good for EF (0.87; 95% CI 0.77 - 0.93), excellent for GLPS (0.91; 95% CI 0.74 - 0.95), and very good for all measures repeated by one of the observers. On Bland-Altman analysis, the mean differences and 95% limits of agreement for é, E/é, EF and GLPS were -0.01 (0.04 - 0.07), 2.0 (-14.2 - 18.1), 0.86 (-16 - 14.3) and 0.04 (-5.04 - 5.12), respectively.
Moderate observer-related differences in assessing LV dysfunction were seen. GLPS is the least user dependent and most reproducible echocardiographic measurement of LV function in septic shock.
超声心动图在重症监护中越来越多地用于血流动力学评估和治疗滴定,这需要可靠且可重复的测量。本研究的目的是评估脓毒性休克患者左心室(LV)舒张和收缩功能障碍的超声心动图检查结果对观察者的依赖性。
一名心脏病专家和一名重症监护医生对47名入住综合重症监护病房(ICU)的脓毒性休克成年患者的超声心动图进行独立评估,观察以下指标:左心室间隔基部舒张期组织速度降低(é)、二尖瓣早期血流速度(E)与é比值增加(E/é)、左心室射血分数(EF)降低和左心室整体纵向峰值应变(GLPS)降低。舒张功能障碍定义为é<8.0 cm/s和/或E/é≥15,收缩功能障碍定义为EF<50%和/或GLPS > -15%。两个月后对随机选择的10次检查进行重新分析。采用Pearson相关系数r检验相关性,采用Bland-Altman图评估观察者之间的一致性。使用Kappa统计量检验读者之间的一致性以及观察者间和观察者内变异性的组内相关系数(ICC)。
44例患者(94%)的图像质量足以进行超声心动图测量。观察者之间的一致性为中等(é的k = 0.60,E/é的k = 0.50,EF的k = 0.60)至良好(GLPS的k = 0.71)。Pearson相关系数r在é为0.76,E/é为0.85,EF为0.78,GLPS为0.84(所有四项p < 0.001)。观察者之间é的ICC非常好(0.85;95%置信区间(CI)0.73 - 0.92),E/é的ICC良好(0.70;95% CI 0.45 - 0. — 84),EF的ICC非常好(0.87;95% CI 0.77 - 0.93),GLPS的ICC优秀(0.91;95% CI 0.74 - 0.95),并且一名观察者重复测量的所有指标的ICC都非常好。在Bland-Altman分析中,é、E/é、EF和GLPS的平均差异和95%一致性界限分别为-0.01(0.04 - 0.07)、2.0(-14.2 - 18.1)、0.86(-16 - 14.3)和0.04(-5.04 - 5.12)。
在评估左心室功能障碍时,观察到与观察者相关的中等差异。GLPS是脓毒性休克中左心室功能最不依赖使用者且最可重复的超声心动图测量指标。