• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2型糖尿病患者知识转移与行为改变干预措施的有效性和成本效益——INDICA研究:一项整群随机对照试验

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of knowledge transfer and behavior modification interventions in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients--the INDICA study: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Ramallo-Fariña Yolanda, García-Pérez Lidia, Castilla-Rodríguez Iván, Perestelo-Pérez Lilisbeth, Wägner Ana María, de Pablos-Velasco Pedro, Domínguez Armando Carrillo, Cortés Mauro Boronat, Vallejo-Torres Laura, Ramírez Marcos Estupiñán, Martín Pablo Pedrianes, García-Puente Ignacio, Salinero-Fort Miguel Ángel, Serrano-Aguilar Pedro Guillermo

机构信息

Fundación Canaria de Investigación Sanitaria (FUNCANIS), Tenerife, Spain.

Servicio de Evaluación del Servicio Canario de la Salud (SESCS), Tenerife, Spain.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 9;10:47. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0233-1.

DOI:10.1186/s13012-015-0233-1
PMID:25880498
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4397722/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease whose health outcomes are related to patients and healthcare professionals' decision-making. The Diabetes Intervention study in the Canary Islands (INDICA study) aims to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of educational interventions supported by new technology decision tools for type 2 diabetes patients and primary care professionals in the Canary Islands.

METHODS/DESIGN: The INDICA study is an open, community-based, multicenter, clinical controlled trial with random allocation by clusters to one of three interventions or to usual care. The setting is primary care where physicians and nurses are invited to participate. Patients with diabetes diagnosis, 18-65 years of age, and regular users of mobile phone were randomly selected. Patients with severe comorbidities were excluded. The clusters are primary healthcare practices with enough professionals and available places to provide the intervention. The calculated sample size was 2,300 patients. Patients in group 1 are receiving an educational group program of eight sessions every 3 months led by trained nurses and monitored by means of logs and a web-based platform and tailored semi-automated SMS for continuous support. Primary care professionals in group 2 are receiving a short educational program to update their diabetes knowledge, which includes a decision support tool embedded into the electronic clinical record and a monthly feedback report of patients' results. Group 3 is receiving a combination of the interventions for patients and professionals. The primary endpoint is the change in HbA1c in 2 years. Secondary endpoints are cardiovascular risk factors, macrovascular and microvascular diabetes complications, quality of life, psychological outcomes, diabetes knowledge, and healthcare utilization. Data is being collected from interviews, questionnaires, clinical examinations, and records. Generalized linear mixed models with repeated time measurements will be used to analyze changes in outcomes. The cost-effectiveness analysis, from the healthcare services perspective, involves direct medical costs per quality-adjusted life year gained and two periods, a 'within-trial' period and a lifetime Markov model. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses are planned.

DISCUSSION

This ongoing trial aims to set up the implementation of evidence-based programs in the clinical setting for chronic patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trial.gov NCT01657227.

摘要

背景

2型糖尿病是一种慢性病,其健康结局与患者及医护人员的决策相关。加那利群岛糖尿病干预研究(INDICA研究)旨在评估新技术决策工具支持的教育干预措施对加那利群岛2型糖尿病患者及初级保健专业人员的有效性和成本效益。

方法/设计:INDICA研究是一项开放的、基于社区的多中心临床对照试验,通过整群随机分配至三种干预措施之一或常规护理。研究场所为邀请医生和护士参与的初级保健机构。随机选取年龄在18 - 65岁、确诊糖尿病且经常使用手机的患者。排除患有严重合并症的患者。整群为有足够专业人员和场地提供干预措施的初级医疗保健机构。计算得出的样本量为2300名患者。第1组患者每3个月接受由经过培训的护士主导的为期8节的教育小组课程,并通过日志和基于网络的平台进行监测,同时定制半自动短信以提供持续支持。第2组初级保健专业人员接受一个简短的教育项目以更新其糖尿病知识,该项目包括嵌入电子临床记录的决策支持工具以及患者结果的月度反馈报告。第3组接受针对患者和专业人员的综合干预措施。主要终点是2年内糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的变化。次要终点包括心血管危险因素、糖尿病大血管和微血管并发症、生活质量、心理结局、糖尿病知识以及医疗保健利用情况。数据通过访谈、问卷、临床检查和记录收集。将使用具有重复时间测量的广义线性混合模型来分析结局变化。从医疗保健服务角度进行的成本效益分析涉及每获得一个质量调整生命年的直接医疗成本以及两个阶段,即“试验期间”和终身马尔可夫模型。计划进行确定性和概率性敏感性分析。

讨论

这项正在进行的试验旨在在临床环境中为慢性病患者建立基于证据的项目实施方案。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01657227

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c287/4397722/b027521a6e42/13012_2015_233_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c287/4397722/b027521a6e42/13012_2015_233_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c287/4397722/b027521a6e42/13012_2015_233_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of knowledge transfer and behavior modification interventions in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients--the INDICA study: a cluster randomized controlled trial.2型糖尿病患者知识转移与行为改变干预措施的有效性和成本效益——INDICA研究:一项整群随机对照试验
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 9;10:47. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0233-1.
2
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention to implement a clinical practice guideline for systemic lupus erythematosus: protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial.多组分干预措施实施系统性红斑狼疮临床实践指南的有效性和成本效益:一项群组随机对照试验方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 1;19(1):783. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4589-9.
3
Effectiveness of Internet-Based Multicomponent Interventions for Patients and Health Care Professionals to Improve Clinical Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Evaluated Through the INDICA Study: Multiarm Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.基于互联网的多组分干预措施对 2 型糖尿病患者和医疗保健专业人员的临床结局改善效果的评估:INDICA 研究:多臂群组随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 2;8(11):e18922. doi: 10.2196/18922.
4
Patient-reported outcome measures for knowledge transfer and behaviour modification interventions in type 2 diabetes-the INDICA study: a multiarm cluster randomised controlled trial.患者报告结局测量在 2 型糖尿病知识转移和行为改变干预中的应用:INDICA 研究:一项多臂群组随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 15;11(12):e050804. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050804.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
HypoAware-a brief and partly web-based psycho-educational group intervention for adults with type 1 and insulin-treated type 2 diabetes and problematic hypoglycaemia: design of a cost-effectiveness randomised controlled trial.HypoAware——一种针对1型糖尿病及接受胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病且有低血糖问题的成年人的简短且部分基于网络的心理教育团体干预措施:一项成本效益随机对照试验的设计
BMC Endocr Disord. 2015 Aug 21;15:43. doi: 10.1186/s12902-015-0035-0.
7
Cost-effectiveness of multicomponent interventions in type 2 diabetes mellitus in a cluster randomised controlled trial: the INDICA study.多组分干预在 2 型糖尿病中的成本效益:INDICA 研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 8;12(4):e058049. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058049.
8
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.结构化、强化教育最大限度地提高糖尿病患儿和青少年的参与度、积极性和长期改变:一项具有整体过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验 - CASCADE 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.
9
Cost-effectiveness of automated telephone self-management support with nurse care management among patients with diabetes.糖尿病患者中自动电话自我管理支持与护士护理管理相结合的成本效益
Ann Fam Med. 2008 Nov-Dec;6(6):512-8. doi: 10.1370/afm.889.
10
The ACHRU-CPP versus usual care for older adults with type-2 diabetes and multiple chronic conditions and their family caregivers: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.ACHRU-CPP与2型糖尿病及多种慢性病老年患者及其家庭照护者的常规护理对比:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Feb 6;18(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1795-9.

引用本文的文献

1
A Randomized Controlled Trial Testing the Effects of a Social Needs Navigation Intervention on Health Outcomes and Healthcare Utilization among Medicaid Members with Type 2 Diabetes.一项随机对照试验,旨在测试社会需求导航干预对 2 型糖尿病 Medicaid 参保患者健康结果和医疗保健利用的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jul 18;21(7):936. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21070936.
2
Understanding Gaps in the Hypertension and Diabetes Care Cascade: Systematic Scoping Review.了解高血压和糖尿病护理级联中的差距:系统范围综述。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Feb 16;10:e51802. doi: 10.2196/51802.
3
Factors associated with patient empowerment in Spanish adults with type 2 diabetes: A cross-sectional analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Core competencies for shared decision making training programs: insights from an international, interdisciplinary working group.共同决策培训项目的核心能力:来自一个国际跨学科工作组的见解
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2013 Fall;33(4):267-73. doi: 10.1002/chp.21197.
2
Computerized decision support systems in primary care for type 2 diabetes patients only improve patients' outcomes when combined with feedback on performance and case management: a systematic review.仅在结合了绩效反馈和病例管理的情况下,初级保健中用于 2 型糖尿病患者的计算机化决策支持系统才能改善患者的结局:一项系统评价。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013 Feb;15(2):180-92. doi: 10.1089/dia.2012.0201.
3
与西班牙 2 型糖尿病成年患者赋权相关的因素:一项横断面分析。
Health Expect. 2022 Dec;25(6):2762-2774. doi: 10.1111/hex.13501. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
4
Increased Patient Empowerment Is Associated with Improvement in Anxiety and Depression Symptoms in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Findings from the INDICA Study.患者赋权与 2 型糖尿病焦虑和抑郁症状改善相关:INDICA 研究结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 15;19(8):4818. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084818.
5
Cost-effectiveness of multicomponent interventions in type 2 diabetes mellitus in a cluster randomised controlled trial: the INDICA study.多组分干预在 2 型糖尿病中的成本效益:INDICA 研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 8;12(4):e058049. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058049.
6
Patient-reported outcome measures for knowledge transfer and behaviour modification interventions in type 2 diabetes-the INDICA study: a multiarm cluster randomised controlled trial.患者报告结局测量在 2 型糖尿病知识转移和行为改变干预中的应用:INDICA 研究:一项多臂群组随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 15;11(12):e050804. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050804.
7
Cost-Effectiveness of Technology-Assisted Case Management in Low-Income, Rural Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.技术辅助病例管理在低收入农村2型糖尿病成年人中的成本效益
Health Equity. 2021 Jul 26;5(1):503-511. doi: 10.1089/heq.2020.0134. eCollection 2021.
8
Effectiveness of Internet-Based Multicomponent Interventions for Patients and Health Care Professionals to Improve Clinical Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Evaluated Through the INDICA Study: Multiarm Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.基于互联网的多组分干预措施对 2 型糖尿病患者和医疗保健专业人员的临床结局改善效果的评估:INDICA 研究:多臂群组随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 2;8(11):e18922. doi: 10.2196/18922.
9
Effectiveness of the Chronic Care Model in Type 2 Diabetes Management in a Community Health Service Center in China: A Group Randomized Experimental Study.中国社区卫生服务中心应用慢性病管理模式对 2 型糖尿病管理的效果:一项群组随机对照试验研究。
J Diabetes Res. 2019 Jan 3;2019:6516581. doi: 10.1155/2019/6516581. eCollection 2019.
10
Evaluating the Efficacy of Knowledge-Transfer Interventions on Animal Health Knowledge of Rural Working Equid Owners in Central Ethiopia: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.评估知识转移干预措施对埃塞俄比亚中部农村役用马所有者动物健康知识的效果:一项整群随机对照试验
Front Vet Sci. 2018 Nov 20;5:282. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00282. eCollection 2018.
Mobile health applications to assist patients with diabetes: lessons learned and design implications.
用于协助糖尿病患者的移动健康应用程序:经验教训与设计启示。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012 Sep 1;6(5):1197-206. doi: 10.1177/193229681200600525.
4
Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials.《CONSORT 2010声明:群组随机试验扩展版》
BMJ. 2012 Sep 4;345:e5661. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5661.
5
A 14-item Mediterranean diet assessment tool and obesity indexes among high-risk subjects: the PREDIMED trial.一种 14 项的地中海饮食评估工具和高危人群中的肥胖指数:PREDIMED 试验。
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43134. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043134. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
6
Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice.共同决策:一种临床实践模式。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct;27(10):1361-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6. Epub 2012 May 23.
7
Training health professionals in shared decision-making: an international environmental scan.培训医疗卫生专业人员进行共同决策:国际环境扫描。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Aug;88(2):159-69. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.01.002. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
8
Ensuring treatment fidelity in a multi-site behavioral intervention study: implementing NIH Behavior Change Consortium recommendations in the SMART trial.确保多地点行为干预研究中的治疗一致性:在 SMART 试验中实施 NIH 行为改变联盟的建议。
Psychooncology. 2011 Nov;20(11):1193-201. doi: 10.1002/pon.1845.
9
Implementation of a tool to modify behavior in a chronic disease management program.在慢性病管理项目中实施一种改变行为的工具。
Adv Prev Med. 2011;2011:215842. doi: 10.4061/2011/215842. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
10
Mental health professionals' attitudes to partnership in medicine taking: a validation study of the Leeds Attitude to Concordance Scale II.精神健康专业人员对药物治疗合作的态度:对利兹一致性态度量表 II 的验证研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 Feb;21(2):123-9. doi: 10.1002/pds.2240. Epub 2011 Sep 28.