• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与西班牙 2 型糖尿病成年患者赋权相关的因素:一项横断面分析。

Factors associated with patient empowerment in Spanish adults with type 2 diabetes: A cross-sectional analysis.

机构信息

Canary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), Tenerife, Spain.

Department of Clinical Psychology, Psychobiology and Methodology, University of La Laguna (ULL), Tenerife, Spain.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2022 Dec;25(6):2762-2774. doi: 10.1111/hex.13501. Epub 2022 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13501
PMID:36047480
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9700189/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study is to identify factors associated with patient empowerment in people living with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the Canary Islands (Spain).

METHODS

Secondary cross-sectional analysis was carried out of data obtained in the INDICA study: A 24-month cluster randomized-controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of educational interventions supported by new technology decision tools for T2DM patients. Sociodemographic variables, clinical data (years since diagnosis, glycated haemoglobin level, creatine, triglycerides, waist hip index, body mass index and number of comorbidities), diabetes knowledge (DIATEK), affective outcomes (Beck Depression Inventory-II, the State subscale of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and The Diabetes Distress Scale) and diabetes-related quality of life (The Audit of Diabetes-Dependent Quality of life) were assessed as potential correlates of patient empowerment, assessed using the Diabetes Empowerment Scale-Short Form. Multilevel mixed linear regression models on patient empowerment were developed.

RESULTS

The analysis included the baseline data of 2334 patients. Results showed that age (B = -0.14; p < .001), diabetes knowledge (B = 0.61; p < .001) and state-anxiety (B = -0.09; p < .001) are significantly associated with patient empowerment. Sex, education level, living alone, employment status, country of birth, time since diagnosis, number of comorbidities, glycated haemoglobin level, depression and distress were not independently associated with patient empowerment in the multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSION

Younger age, lower state-anxiety and greater diabetes-specific knowledge are important correlates of patient empowerment. In line with the results of the INDICA study, interventions based on patient-centred care might be effective in improving patient empowerment in adults with T2DM. Understanding the factors associated with empowerment may help clinicians and policymakers to identify high-risk groups, prioritize resources and target evidence-based interventions to better support people with T2DM to be actively involved in their own care.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Patients with T2DM were actively involved in the design of the INDICA study. Two patient associations were included as part of the research team and actively participated in designing the interventions and selecting outcome measures.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定与加那利群岛(西班牙) 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者赋权相关的因素。

方法

对 INDICA 研究中的数据进行二次横断面分析:一项为期 24 个月的群组随机对照试验,评估支持新技术决策工具的教育干预对 T2DM 患者的有效性。评估社会人口统计学变量、临床数据(诊断后年限、糖化血红蛋白水平、肌酐、甘油三酯、腰臀比、体重指数和共病数量)、糖尿病知识(DIATEK)、情感结果(贝克抑郁量表第二版、状态特质焦虑量表状态分量表和糖尿病困扰量表)和糖尿病相关生活质量(糖尿病患者依赖生活质量评估),作为患者赋权的潜在相关因素,使用糖尿病赋权量表-简短形式进行评估。建立患者赋权的多水平混合线性回归模型。

结果

分析包括 2334 名患者的基线数据。结果表明,年龄(B=-0.14;p<0.001)、糖尿病知识(B=0.61;p<0.001)和状态焦虑(B=-0.09;p<0.001)与患者赋权显著相关。性别、教育程度、独居、就业状况、出生地、诊断后年限、共病数量、糖化血红蛋白水平、抑郁和困扰在多变量分析中与患者赋权无关。

结论

年龄较小、状态焦虑较低和糖尿病知识较高是患者赋权的重要相关因素。与 INDICA 研究的结果一致,基于以患者为中心的护理的干预措施可能会有效提高 T2DM 成年患者的患者赋权。了解赋权的相关因素可以帮助临床医生和政策制定者识别高风险群体,优先分配资源,并针对基于证据的干预措施,以更好地支持 T2DM 患者积极参与自身护理。

患者或公众贡献

T2DM 患者积极参与了 INDICA 研究的设计。两个患者协会作为研究小组的一部分参与其中,并积极参与设计干预措施和选择结局测量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bb4/9700189/204f325a5d3c/HEX-25--g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bb4/9700189/204f325a5d3c/HEX-25--g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bb4/9700189/204f325a5d3c/HEX-25--g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors associated with patient empowerment in Spanish adults with type 2 diabetes: A cross-sectional analysis.与西班牙 2 型糖尿病成年患者赋权相关的因素:一项横断面分析。
Health Expect. 2022 Dec;25(6):2762-2774. doi: 10.1111/hex.13501. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
2
Increased Patient Empowerment Is Associated with Improvement in Anxiety and Depression Symptoms in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Findings from the INDICA Study.患者赋权与 2 型糖尿病焦虑和抑郁症状改善相关:INDICA 研究结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 15;19(8):4818. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084818.
3
Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.心理干预对改善 1 型和 2 型糖尿病自我管理的效果:系统综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(28):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24280.
4
Patient-reported outcome measures for knowledge transfer and behaviour modification interventions in type 2 diabetes-the INDICA study: a multiarm cluster randomised controlled trial.患者报告结局测量在 2 型糖尿病知识转移和行为改变干预中的应用:INDICA 研究:一项多臂群组随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 15;11(12):e050804. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050804.
5
Do Perceptions of Empowerment Affect Glycemic Control and Self-Care Among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes?对赋权的认知是否会影响2型糖尿病成年人的血糖控制和自我护理?
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Feb 24;7(5):80-90. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n5p80.
6
Empowerment among adult patients with type 2 diabetes: age differentials in relation to person-centred primary care, community resources, social support and other life-contextual circumstances.2 型糖尿病成年患者的赋权:与以患者为中心的初级保健、社区资源、社会支持和其他生活环境情况相关的年龄差异。
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 1;21(1):844. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10855-0.
7
Does patient empowerment predict self-care behavior and glycosylated hemoglobin in chinese patients with type 2 diabetes?患者赋权是否能预测中国 2 型糖尿病患者的自我护理行为和糖化血红蛋白?
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 May;17(5):343-8. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0345. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
8
Effectiveness of empowerment-based intervention on HbA1c and self-efficacy among cases with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.基于授权的干预对 2 型糖尿病患者 HbA1c 和自我效能的影响:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Sep 24;100(38):e27353. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027353.
9
Adult patient access to electronic health records.成年患者获取电子健康记录。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 26;2(2):CD012707. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012707.pub2.
10
The relationship between patient empowerment and related constructs, affective symptoms and quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.2 型糖尿病患者的患者赋权与相关结构、情感症状和生活质量之间的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 17;11:1118324. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1118324. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Person-Centred Diabetes Care: Examining Patient Empowerment and Diabetes-Specific Quality of Life in Slovenian Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.以患者为中心的糖尿病护理:探究斯洛文尼亚成年2型糖尿病患者的自我赋权及糖尿病特异性生活质量
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Apr 26;12(9):899. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12090899.
2
Epidemiological Situation of High-Prevalence Non-Communicable Diseases in Spain: A Systematic Review.西班牙高流行率非传染性疾病的流行病学情况:一项系统综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 15;12(22):7109. doi: 10.3390/jcm12227109.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient-reported outcome measures for knowledge transfer and behaviour modification interventions in type 2 diabetes-the INDICA study: a multiarm cluster randomised controlled trial.患者报告结局测量在 2 型糖尿病知识转移和行为改变干预中的应用:INDICA 研究:一项多臂群组随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 15;11(12):e050804. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050804.
2
Effectiveness of interventions based on patient empowerment in the control of type 2 diabetes in sub-Saharan Africa: A review of randomized controlled trials.基于患者赋权的干预措施在撒哈拉以南非洲地区 2 型糖尿病控制中的效果:一项随机对照试验综述。
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2020 Aug 25;4(1):e00174. doi: 10.1002/edm2.174. eCollection 2021 Jan.
3
Correlates of preferring a passive role in decision-making among patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.
精神分裂症或双相情感障碍患者在决策中更倾向于被动角色的相关因素。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 May;104(5):1125-1131. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.019. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
4
Effectiveness of Internet-Based Multicomponent Interventions for Patients and Health Care Professionals to Improve Clinical Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Evaluated Through the INDICA Study: Multiarm Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.基于互联网的多组分干预措施对 2 型糖尿病患者和医疗保健专业人员的临床结局改善效果的评估:INDICA 研究:多臂群组随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Nov 2;8(11):e18922. doi: 10.2196/18922.
5
Global, regional, and national burden and trend of diabetes in 195 countries and territories: an analysis from 1990 to 2025.全球、地区和国家 195 个国家和地区的糖尿病负担和趋势:1990 年至 2025 年的分析。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 8;10(1):14790. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71908-9.
6
Type D Personality Is Associated with Glycemic Control and Socio-Psychological Factors on Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study.D型人格与2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制及社会心理因素相关:一项横断面研究。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2020 May 1;13:373-381. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S245226. eCollection 2020.
7
Social Support, Self-Efficacy, and Psychological Wellbeing of Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.成年人 2 型糖尿病的社会支持、自我效能与心理健康。
West J Nurs Res. 2021 Apr;43(4):288-297. doi: 10.1177/0193945920921101. Epub 2020 May 16.
8
Empowerment in healthcare: A thematic synthesis and critical discussion of concept analyses of empowerment.赋能医疗保健:赋能概念分析的主题综合与批判性讨论。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Jul;103(7):1263-1271. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.02.017. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
9
Incidence of diabetes mellitus in Spain as results of the nation-wide cohort di@bet.es study.西班牙全国队列研究糖尿病发病率结果。
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 17;10(1):2765. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59643-7.
10
Major amputations in type 2 diabetes between 2001 and 2015 in Spain: regional differences.2001 年至 2015 年期间西班牙 2 型糖尿病患者的主要截肢术:地区差异。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jan 14;20(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-8137-7.