Gölz Lina, Papageorgiou Spyridon N, Jäger Andreas
Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Bonn, 53111, Bonn, Germany.
Department of Oral Technology, School of Dentistry, University of Bonn, 53111, Bonn, Germany.
Contact Dermatitis. 2015 Jul;73(1):1-14. doi: 10.1111/cod.12392. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
Nickel-containing alloys are widely used in orthodontic appliances, even though nickel is by far the most common contact allergen. However, the scientific evidence concerning allergic reactions to nickel in orthodontic patients has not been evaluated systematically. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the prevalence of nickel hypersensitivity is affected by orthodontic treatment. Unrestricted electronic and manual searches were performed until July 2013 for human clinical studies assessing orthodontic treatment and nickel hypersensitivity. Methodological limitations were evaluated with the Downs and Black tool. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated from random-effects meta-analyses, followed by subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Thirty studies were included in the review, and 24 datasets with 10 184 patients in the meta-analyses. Orthodontic treatment had no significant effect on nickel hypersensitivity (n = 11; crude OR 0.99; 95%CI: 0.78-1.25; p = 0.914). However, when confounding from factors such as sex and piercings was taken into account, orthodontic treatment was associated with a lower risk of hypersensitivity (n = 1; adjusted OR 0.60; 95%CI: 0.40-0.80; p < 0.001). This was even more pronounced when orthodontic treatment was performed prior to piercing (n = 7; crude OR 0.35; 95%CI: 0.24-0.50; p < 0.001). Orthodontic treatment seems to have a protective role against nickel hypersensitivity, especially when it precedes piercings.
含镍合金被广泛应用于正畸矫治器,尽管镍是目前最常见的接触性过敏原。然而,关于正畸患者对镍过敏反应的科学证据尚未得到系统评估。本研究的目的是调查正畸治疗是否会影响镍超敏反应的患病率。截至2013年7月,我们进行了不受限制的电子和手工检索,以查找评估正畸治疗和镍超敏反应的人体临床研究。使用唐斯和布莱克工具评估方法学局限性。通过随机效应荟萃分析计算粗比值比(OR)和调整后的比值比及其95%置信区间(CI),随后进行亚组分析和敏感性分析。该综述纳入了30项研究,荟萃分析中有24个数据集,涉及10184例患者。正畸治疗对镍超敏反应没有显著影响(n = 11;粗OR 0.99;95%CI:0.78 - 1.25;p = 0.914)。然而,当考虑到性别和穿孔等因素的混杂影响时,正畸治疗与较低的超敏反应风险相关(n = 1;调整后OR 0.60;95%CI:0.40 - 0.80;p < 0.001)。当在穿孔之前进行正畸治疗时,这种情况更为明显(n = 7;粗OR 0.35;95%CI:0.24 - 0.50;p < 0.001)。正畸治疗似乎对镍超敏反应具有保护作用,尤其是在穿孔之前进行正畸治疗时。