• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

异质性统计量I(2)在小型荟萃分析中可能存在偏差。

The heterogeneity statistic I(2) can be biased in small meta-analyses.

作者信息

von Hippel Paul T

机构信息

Center for Health and Social Policy, LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas, Austin, 2315 Red River, Box Y, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Apr 14;15:35. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0024-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12874-015-0024-z
PMID:25880989
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4410499/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Estimated effects vary across studies, partly because of random sampling error and partly because of heterogeneity. In meta-analysis, the fraction of variance that is due to heterogeneity is estimated by the statistic I(2). We calculate the bias of I(2), focusing on the situation where the number of studies in the meta-analysis is small. Small meta-analyses are common; in the Cochrane Library, the median number of studies per meta-analysis is 7 or fewer.

METHODS

We use Mathematica software to calculate the expectation and bias of I(2).

RESULTS

I(2) has a substantial bias when the number of studies is small. The bias is positive when the true fraction of heterogeneity is small, but the bias is typically negative when the true fraction of heterogeneity is large. For example, with 7 studies and no true heterogeneity, I(2) will overestimate heterogeneity by an average of 12 percentage points, but with 7 studies and 80 percent true heterogeneity, I(2) can underestimate heterogeneity by an average of 28 percentage points. Biases of 12-28 percentage points are not trivial when one considers that, in the Cochrane Library, the median I(2) estimate is 21 percent.

CONCLUSIONS

The point estimate I(2) should be interpreted cautiously when a meta-analysis has few studies. In small meta-analyses, confidence intervals should supplement or replace the biased point estimate I(2).

摘要

背景

不同研究的估计效应有所不同,部分原因是随机抽样误差,部分原因是异质性。在荟萃分析中,由异质性导致的方差比例通过统计量I(2)来估计。我们计算I(2)的偏差,重点关注荟萃分析中研究数量较少的情况。小型荟萃分析很常见;在考科蓝图书馆中,每个荟萃分析的研究数量中位数为7个或更少。

方法

我们使用Mathematica软件来计算I(2)的期望值和偏差。

结果

当研究数量较少时,I(2)存在较大偏差。当真正的异质性比例较小时,偏差为正,但当真正的异质性比例较大时,偏差通常为负。例如,对于7项研究且不存在真正的异质性时,I(2)将平均高估异质性12个百分点,但对于7项研究且真正的异质性为80%时,I(2)可能会平均低估异质性28个百分点。考虑到在考科蓝图书馆中,I(2)的中位数估计值为21%,12 - 28个百分点的偏差并非微不足道。

结论

当荟萃分析的研究数量较少时,应谨慎解释点估计值I(2)。在小型荟萃分析中,置信区间应补充或替代有偏差的点估计值I(2)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfe6/4410499/50fce69b4b7b/12874_2015_24_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfe6/4410499/377d2aaf3a58/12874_2015_24_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfe6/4410499/47e35ef9ff0d/12874_2015_24_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfe6/4410499/992f7c16464b/12874_2015_24_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfe6/4410499/50fce69b4b7b/12874_2015_24_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfe6/4410499/377d2aaf3a58/12874_2015_24_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfe6/4410499/47e35ef9ff0d/12874_2015_24_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfe6/4410499/992f7c16464b/12874_2015_24_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfe6/4410499/50fce69b4b7b/12874_2015_24_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The heterogeneity statistic I(2) can be biased in small meta-analyses.异质性统计量I(2)在小型荟萃分析中可能存在偏差。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Apr 14;15:35. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0024-z.
2
The effect of sample size and bias on the reliability of estimates of error: a comparative study of Dahlberg's formula.样本量和偏倚对误差估计可靠性的影响:Dahlberg 公式的比较研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Apr;34(2):158-63. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr010. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
3
A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses.模拟随机效应荟萃分析中异质性方差估计量的比较。
Res Synth Methods. 2019 Mar;10(1):83-98. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1316. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
4
Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.Meta分析中异质性和偏倚检验的解读。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):951-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00986.x.
5
The impact of stopping rules on heterogeneity of results in overviews of clinical trials.停止规则对临床试验综述结果异质性的影响。
Biometrics. 1992 Mar;48(1):41-53.
6
A new measure of between-studies heterogeneity in meta-analysis.荟萃分析中研究间异质性的一种新度量方法。
Stat Med. 2016 Sep 20;35(21):3661-75. doi: 10.1002/sim.6980. Epub 2016 May 10.
7
Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.实证评估表明,Copas选择模型在80%的荟萃分析中提供了有用的总结。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Jun;62(6):624-631.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.12.002. Epub 2009 Mar 12.
8
A new u-statistic with superior design sensitivity in matched observational studies.一种在匹配观察性研究中具有卓越设计敏感性的新u统计量。
Biometrics. 2011 Sep;67(3):1017-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01535.x. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
9
A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies.研究结果合并中异质性方差估计量的比较。
Stat Med. 2007 Apr 30;26(9):1964-81. doi: 10.1002/sim.2688.
10
Fixed- versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results.荟萃分析中的固定效应模型与随机效应模型:模型特性及结果差异的实证比较
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2009 Feb;62(Pt 1):97-128. doi: 10.1348/000711007X255327. Epub 2007 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and efficacy of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus fasting during Ramadan: a systematic review and meta-analysis.斋月期间禁食的2型糖尿病患者使用胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂的安全性和有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
World J Methodol. 2025 Dec 20;15(4):105478. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i4.105478.
2
Detecting papilloedema as a marker of raised intracranial pressure using artificial intelligence: A systematic review.利用人工智能将视乳头水肿作为颅内压升高的标志物进行检测:一项系统综述。
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Sep 2;4(9):e0000783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000783. eCollection 2025 Sep.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Coffee consumption and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: a dose-response meta-analysis.咖啡摄入量与全因死亡率、心血管疾病死亡率和癌症死亡率的关系:一项剂量反应荟萃分析。
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Oct 15;180(8):763-75. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu194. Epub 2014 Aug 24.
2
Dietary fiber intake and total mortality: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.膳食纤维摄入量与总死亡率:前瞻性队列研究的荟萃分析。
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Sep 15;180(6):565-73. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu174. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
3
Cumulative meta-analysis of job strain and CHD.
Effect of feeding protected sodium butyrate on production performance and intestinal morphology of broilers: A meta-analysis.
饲喂包被丁酸钠对肉鸡生产性能和肠道形态的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Poult Sci. 2025 Aug 14;104(11):105683. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.105683.
4
Associations of Birth Size with Physical and Cognitive Function in Men and Women 60 Years and Older-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.60岁及以上男性和女性出生体重与身体和认知功能的关联——系统评价与荟萃分析
Nutrients. 2025 Aug 8;17(16):2583. doi: 10.3390/nu17162583.
5
Disease burden of seasonal influenza in China from 2010 to 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on multiple indicators.2010年至2019年中国季节性流感的疾病负担:基于多指标的系统评价和荟萃分析
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025 Dec;21(1):2550092. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2550092. Epub 2025 Aug 27.
6
The efficacy and safety of androgen analog oxandrolone in improving clinical outcomes in burn patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.雄激素类似物氧雄龙改善烧伤患者临床结局的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 8;12:1485474. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1485474. eCollection 2025.
7
Prevalence of suicidal behaviours among medical students in South Asia in the 1 quarter of the 21 century: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.21世纪第1季度南亚医学生自杀行为的患病率:一项系统评价和Meta分析方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 26;15(8):e103698. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103698.
8
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocol on Depressive Symptoms Among Medical Students in South Asia Using Patient-reported Validated Assessment Tools: Prevalence and Associated Factors.一项关于使用患者报告的有效评估工具对南亚医学生抑郁症状的系统评价和荟萃分析方案:患病率及相关因素
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 26;20(8):e0331033. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331033. eCollection 2025.
9
Epidemiology and risk factors of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias in South and Southeast Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.南亚和东南亚地区阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症的流行病学与风险因素:一项系统综述和荟萃分析方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 21;15(8):e105955. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105955.
10
Depression among medical students in Bangladesh: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol on prevalence and associated factors.孟加拉国医学生中的抑郁症:关于患病率及相关因素的系统评价和荟萃分析方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 19;15(8):e102916. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102916.
工作压力与冠心病的累积荟萃分析。
Epidemiology. 2014 May;25(3):464-5. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000087.
4
Physical activity and the risk of preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.身体活动与先兆子痫风险:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Epidemiology. 2014 May;25(3):331-43. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000036.
5
The effects of clinical and statistical heterogeneity on the predictive values of results from meta-analyses.临床和统计学异质性对荟萃分析结果预测值的影响。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 Feb;20(2):123-9. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12494.
6
Avoiding zero between-study variance estimates in random-effects meta-analysis.在随机效应荟萃分析中避免组间方差估计值为零。
Stat Med. 2013 Oct 15;32(23):4071-89. doi: 10.1002/sim.5821. Epub 2013 May 13.
7
Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.利用 Cochrane 系统评价数据库中的实证数据预测荟萃分析中的异质性程度。
Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Jun;41(3):818-27. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys041. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
8
Characteristics of meta-analyses and their component studies in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: a cross-sectional, descriptive analysis.Cochrane 系统评价数据库中荟萃分析及其组成研究的特征:一项横断面、描述性分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Nov 24;11:160. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-160.
9
Statins and all-cause mortality in high-risk primary prevention: a meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials involving 65,229 participants.他汀类药物与高危一级预防中的全因死亡率:一项涉及65229名参与者的11项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jun 28;170(12):1024-31. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.182.
10
A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis.随机效应荟萃分析的重新评估。
J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2009 Jan;172(1):137-159. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00552.x.