Yim Ilona S, Quas Jodi A, Rush Elizabeth B, Granger Douglas A, Skoluda Nadine
Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-7085, United States.
Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-7085, United States.
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2015 Jul;57:61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.03.021. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
Reliable laboratory protocols manipulating the intensity of biobehavioral arousal for children are uncommon, and those available have minimal converging evidence of their efficacy in manipulating arousal across multiple biological systems. This report presents two studies of the efficacy of the modified Trier Social Stress Test (TSST-M). In Study 1, sixty-three 7-15-year olds, and 19 young adults (18-25 yrs) completed the TSST-M. Comparable reactivity across age groups was observed for salivary cortisol, salivary alpha-amylase (sAA), pre-ejection period (PEP) and respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), whereas self-reported stress was higher in adults compared to children. In Study 2, eighty-four 7-8-year olds and eighty-six 12-15-year olds were randomly assigned to a standard or low-stress TSST-M condition. Cortisol and self-reported stress responses were higher in the standard compared to the low-stress condition. In contrast, sAA and PEP were higher in the low-stress condition and RSA responses were comparable between the two TSST-M conditions. In addition, age group differences emerged in Study 2, though never in conjunction with the TSST-M manipulation. To test, refine, and advance theory about the implications of stress for child development, laboratory tasks that manipulate and enable assessment of biobehavioral arousal in children are needed.
针对儿童,能有效控制生物行为唤醒强度的可靠实验室方案并不常见,而且现有的方案在跨多个生物系统控制唤醒方面,几乎没有一致的有效性证据。本报告展示了两项关于改良版特里尔社会应激测试(TSST-M)有效性的研究。在研究1中,63名7至15岁儿童和19名年轻人(18至25岁)完成了TSST-M测试。在唾液皮质醇、唾液α淀粉酶(sAA)、射血前期(PEP)和呼吸性窦性心律不齐(RSA)方面,各年龄组的反应相当,而成年人自我报告的压力水平高于儿童。在研究2中,84名7至8岁儿童和8名12至15岁儿童被随机分配到标准或低压力TSST-M测试条件组。与低压力条件相比,标准条件下的皮质醇和自我报告的压力反应更高。相反,低压力条件下的sAA和PEP更高,两种TSST-M测试条件下的RSA反应相当。此外,研究2中出现了年龄组差异,不过这种差异从未与TSST-M测试操作同时出现。为了检验、完善并推进关于压力对儿童发育影响的理论,需要有能控制并评估儿童生物行为唤醒的实验室任务。