Elhafz Ahmed Ali Abd, Elgebaly Ahmed Said, Bassuoni Ahmed Sobhy, El Dabaa Ahmed Ali
Department of Anesthesia and SICUD, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Anesth Essays Res. 2012 Jul-Dec;6(2):140-6. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.108291.
To evaluate the efficacy of lidocaine patch applied around wound in laparoscopic colorectal surgery in reduction of postoperative pain and illus compared to intravenous lidocaine infusion and placebo.
Postoperative illus and pain after colorectal surgery is a challenging problem associated with increased morbidity and cost. Inflammatory response to surgery plays crucial rule in inducing postoperative illus. Systemic local anesthetics proved to have anti-inflammatory properties that may be beneficial in preventing ileus added to its analgesic actions. The lidocaine patch evaluated in many types of pain with promising results. We try to evaluate the patch in perioperative field as a more simple and safe technique than the intravenous route.
Prospective, randomized, controlled study was conducted, comparing three groups. Group 1 (placebo) received saline infusion, group 2 received i.v. lidocaine infusion after induction of anesthesia, 2 mg/min if body weight >70 kg or 1 mg/min if body weight <70 kg, group 3 received lidocaine patch 5%, three patches each one divided into two equal parts and applied around the three wounds just before induction. Data collected were, pain scores (VAS), morphine consumption, return of bowel function, pro-inflammatory cytokines plasma levels and plasma lidocaine level.
Pain intensity (VAS) scores at rest and during coughing were significantly lower during the first 72 h postoperative in i.v. lidocaine group and patch group compared to the placebo group. Mean morphine consumption were significantly lower in the i.v. lidocaine group and patch group compared to placebo group. Return of the bowel function was significantly earlier in i.v. lidocaine group in comparison to the other groups. Proinflammatory cytokines (IL6, IL8, and C3a) were significantly lower in i.v. lidocaine group compared to the other two groups.
The lidocaine patch was equal to i.v. lidocaine infusion in decreasing pain scores and morphine consumption but not in acceleration of bowel function return.
比较利多卡因贴片应用于腹腔镜结直肠手术伤口周围与静脉输注利多卡因及安慰剂相比,在减轻术后疼痛和肠梗阻方面的疗效。
结直肠手术后的肠梗阻和疼痛是一个具有挑战性的问题,与发病率增加和成本上升相关。手术的炎症反应在诱发术后肠梗阻中起关键作用。全身局部麻醉药已被证明具有抗炎特性,这可能有助于预防肠梗阻,此外还有镇痛作用。利多卡因贴片在多种疼痛类型中进行了评估,结果令人满意。我们试图在围手术期评估该贴片,因为它是一种比静脉途径更简单、更安全的技术。
进行前瞻性、随机、对照研究,比较三组。第1组(安慰剂组)接受生理盐水输注,第2组在麻醉诱导后接受静脉输注利多卡因,体重>70 kg者为2 mg/min,体重<70 kg者为1 mg/min,第3组接受5%利多卡因贴片,每片分成两等份,在诱导前分别贴于三个伤口周围。收集的数据包括疼痛评分(视觉模拟评分法)、吗啡用量、肠功能恢复情况以及促炎细胞因子血浆水平和血浆利多卡因水平。
与安慰剂组相比,静脉输注利多卡因组和贴片组术后前72小时静息和咳嗽时的疼痛强度(视觉模拟评分法)评分显著更低。与安慰剂组相比,静脉输注利多卡因组和贴片组的平均吗啡用量显著更低。与其他组相比,静脉输注利多卡因组的肠功能恢复明显更早。与其他两组相比,静脉输注利多卡因组的促炎细胞因子(IL6、IL8和C3a)显著更低。
利多卡因贴片在降低疼痛评分和吗啡用量方面与静脉输注利多卡因相当,但在加速肠功能恢复方面不如静脉输注利多卡因。